Texas: Put Creationism In Every Textbook!!!

[The Scientific States]

In my opinion, every textbook should cover both Creationism and Evolution at the same time, referring to them both as theories. Our current textbooks make Evolution seem like scientifically-sound 100% scientific fact when even the best science professor will admit to you that at best, Evolution is simply a poorly supported theory. Public school students all over are constantly brainwashed and fed evolution so when they grow up, they think that evolution must be true. Do away with scientific bias in Education.

Creationism was a myth/folktale in the bible to explain why mankind was created. Evolution is essentially a scientifically sound fact considering the shit-ton of evidence supporting it.

[Agritum]

In my opinion, every textbook should cover both Creationism and Evolution at the same time, referring to them both as theories. Our current textbooks make Evolution seem like scientifically-sound 100% scientific fact when even the best science professor will admit to you that at best, Evolution is simply a poorly supported theory. Public school students all over are constantly brainwashed and fed evolution so when they grow up, they think that evolution must be true. Do away with scientific bias in Education.

By the same reasoning, we should also teach Alchemy along Chemistry, and Numerology along Maths.

[Blasveck]

In my opinion, every textbook should cover both Creationism and Evolution at the same time, referring to them both as theories. Our current textbooks make Evolution seem like scientifically-sound 100% scientific fact when even the best science professor will admit to you that at best, Evolution is simply a poorly supported theory. Public school students all over are constantly brainwashed and fed evolution so when they grow up, they think that evolution must be true. Do away with scientific bias in Education.

Creationism is undeniably false.

Evolution is near-undeniably true.

[Ompok]

If Texas was on the other side of the world it would be called Douchebagistan

[Christian Union]

In my opinion, every textbook should cover both Creationism and Evolution at the same time, referring to them both as theories. Our current textbooks make Evolution seem like scientifically-sound 100% scientific fact when even the best science professor will admit to you that at best, Evolution is simply a poorly supported theory. Public school students all over are constantly brainwashed and fed evolution so when they grow up, they think that evolution must be true. Do away with scientific bias in Education.

Yes

[Wisconsin9]

In my opinion, every textbook should cover both Creationism and Evolution at the same time, referring to them both as theories. Our current textbooks make Evolution seem like scientifically-sound 100% scientific fact when even the best science professor will admit to you that at best, Evolution is simply a poorly supported theory. Public school students all over are constantly brainwashed and fed evolution so when they grow up, they think that evolution must be true. Do away with scientific bias in Education.

Only if we include Buddhist, Hindu, Norse, Zoroastrian, and various Native American creation stories as well.

[Ainin]

intelligent design has some scientific merit

Intelligent design has as much scientific merit as saying the air is made of chocolate sauce.

[Neo-Mlytoria]

The USA needs to invade that backwards wasteland.

[The Scientific States]

In my opinion, every textbook should cover both Creationism and Evolution at the same time, referring to them both as theories. Our current textbooks make Evolution seem like scientifically-sound 100% scientific fact when even the best science professor will admit to you that at best, Evolution is simply a poorly supported theory. Public school students all over are constantly brainwashed and fed evolution so when they grow up, they think that evolution must be true. Do away with scientific bias in Education.

Yes

No.

[Ainin]

The USA needs to invade that backwards wasteland.

You're a bit late.

[Benuty]

In my opinion, every textbook should cover both Creationism and Evolution at the same time, referring to them both as theories. Our current textbooks make Evolution seem like scientifically-sound 100% scientific fact when even the best science professor will admit to you that at best, Evolution is simply a poorly supported theory. Public school students all over are constantly brainwashed and fed evolution so when they grow up, they think that evolution must be true. Do away with scientific bias in Education.

Creationism was a myth/folktale in the bible to explain why mankind was created. Evolution is essentially a scientifically sound fact considering the shit-ton of evidence supporting it.

No the creationist movement arose out of the ashes of radical politics and reactionaries warped by an authoritarian sense of nationalism during the cold war.

[Divair]

The USA needs to invade that backwards wasteland.

You're a bit late.

Re-invade them.

[The Corparation]

In my opinion, every textbook should cover both Creationism and Evolution at the same time, referring to them both as theories. Our current textbooks make Evolution seem like scientifically-sound 100% scientific fact when even the best science professor will admit to you that at best, Evolution is simply a poorly supported theory. Public school students all over are constantly brainwashed and fed evolution so when they grow up, they think that evolution must be true. Do away with scientific bias in Education.

Only if we include Buddhist, Hindu, Norse, Zoroastrian, and various Native American creation stories as well.

You left out Pastafarian you Anti-Noodled Bigot!

[Ainin]

In my opinion, every textbook should cover both Creationism and Evolution at the same time, referring to them both as theories. Our current textbooks make Evolution seem like scientifically-sound 100% scientific fact when even the best science professor will admit to you that at best, Evolution is simply a poorly supported theory. Public school students all over are constantly brainwashed and fed evolution so when they grow up, they think that evolution must be true. Do away with scientific bias in Education.

The "it's just a theory" argument is getting old, creationists...

[Nationalist State of Knox]

In my opinion, every textbook should cover both Creationism and Evolution at the same time, referring to them both as theories.

Only one is a theory and scientific.

Our current textbooks make Evolution seem like scientifically-sound 100% scientific fact

Which it is.

when even the best science professor will admit to you that at best, Evolution is simply a poorly supported theory.

You must know some shit science professors who don't know what "theory" means.

Public school students all over are constantly brainwashed and fed evolution so when they grow up,

What have you got against facts?

they think that evolution must be true.

Which it is...

Do away with scientific bias in Education.

I think we'd be better off ignoring anti-intellectualist fringe groups who don't know what they're talking about, but that's just me.

[Edlichbury]

In my opinion, every textbook should cover both Creationism and Evolution at the same time, referring to them both as theories. Our current textbooks make Evolution seem like scientifically-sound 100% scientific fact when even the best science professor will admit to you that at best, Evolution is simply a poorly supported theory. Public school students all over are constantly brainwashed and fed evolution so when they grow up, they think that evolution must be true. Do away with scientific bias in Education.

By the same reasoning, we should also teach Alchemy along Chemistry, and Numerology along Maths.

The idea that common lead cannot be turned into gold must be done away with!

[Brickistan]

In my opinion, every textbook should cover both Creationism and Evolution at the same time, referring to them both as theories. Our current textbooks make Evolution seem like scientifically-sound 100% scientific fact when even the best science professor will admit to you that at best, Evolution is simply a poorly supported theory. Public school students all over are constantly brainwashed and fed evolution so when they grow up, they think that evolution must be true. Do away with scientific bias in Education.

Poorly supported? You do realize that evolution has been directly observed, right? And that evolution is quite well understood, right? And that we have a LOT of evidence to back it up, right?

But of course... Let's teach astrology, alchemy, etc. as well. We wouldn't want to brainwash the poor kids, right?

[Agritum]

By the same reasoning, we should also teach Alchemy along Chemistry, and Numerology along Maths.

The idea that common lead cannot be turned into gold must be done away with!

Oh, it can, but it's quite dispendious due to Equivalent Exchange. It also raises inflation!

[Christian Union]

Yes

No.

Yes. I love to break it to you that there are many people who hold alternative views as to the origins of humanity. Saying "No, this is supreme scientific fact" when mr. Holland indeed mentioned that there are those in the scientific community who say otherwise, just makes you sound like a right-wing creationist whose every talking point is based on their personal interpretation of select scriptures. You may argue "my stance is based on science!" But again, there are many in the public, including scientists, who argue that evolutionary theory is not very scientific. "Undeniable" evidence and all.

[The Tundra]

creastionism is a myth, 1.intelligent design has some scientific merit, and 2.Evolution has the best of all the creation theories we have right now.

1. False.
2. It isn't a creation theory.

1. yes, it does, in the form of genetic engineering by aliens. some, some, some, some, some
2. it is a origin of humans theory, aka creation theory

[Divair]

Yes. I love to break it to you that there are many people who hold alternative views as to the origins of humanity. Saying "No, this is supreme scientific fact" when mr. Holland indeed mentioned that there are those in the scientific community who say otherwise, just makes you sound like a right-wing creationist whose every talking point is based on their personal interpretation of select scriptures. You may argue "my stance is based on science!" But again, there are many in the public, including scientists, who argue that evolutionary theory is not very scientific. "Undeniable" evidence and all.

Opinions are irrelevant.

[The City of Fairview]

Well this is bullcrap.

[Benuty]

1. False.
2. It isn't a creation theory.

1. yes, it does, in the form of genetic engineering by aliens. some, some, some, some, some
2. it is a origin of humans theory, aka creation theory

No.

[The Serbian Empire]

It's just Texas being Texas. I don't like it, but there is little more than letting the state break off that would fix this issue.

[Divair]

1. yes, it does, in the form of genetic engineering by aliens. some, some, some, some, some

There's no evidence to indicate any such nonsense.

2. it is a origin of humans theory, aka creation theory

Wrong.

A. Evolution is evolution, not creation.
B. Abiogenesis explains our origins. And it's still not a creation theory because we weren't created.