NATION

PASSWORD

Gun Control 2023 - ATF Shenanigans, States Fight Back!

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which state will adopt permitless concealed carry next?

North Carolina
15
65%
Nevada
8
35%
 
Total votes : 23

User avatar
Juansonia
Minister
 
Posts: 2316
Founded: Apr 01, 2022
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Juansonia » Tue May 23, 2023 10:09 am

San Lumen wrote:
The Two Jerseys wrote:What's wrong with the sheriffs telling the state to go pound sand and ignoring the law?
If you’re not going to follow the laws passed by the legislature elected in a free and fair election you have no business being sheriff.
You'd say the same about mayors and permit evaluators, right? Right?

edit: Some laws overrule others. The constitution, as is, overrules every other law as applied to American Jurisdiction. If the legislature is unwilling to follow the law, they have no business legislating.
Last edited by Juansonia on Tue May 23, 2023 10:12 am, edited 2 times in total.
Hatsune Miku > British Imperialism
IC: MT if you ignore some stuff(mostly flavor), stats are not canon. Embassy link.
OOC: Owns and (sometimes) wears a maid outfit, wants to pair it with a FN SCAR-L. He/Him/His
Kernen did nothing wrong.
Space Squid wrote:Each sin should get it's own month.

Right now, Pride gets June, and Greed, Envy, and Gluttony have to share Thanksgiving/Black Friday through Christmas, Sloth gets one day in September, and Lust gets one day in February.

It's not equitable at all
Gandoor wrote:Cliché: A mod making a reply that's full of swearing after someone asks if you're allowed to swear on this site.

It makes me chuckle every time it happens.
Brits mistake Miku for their Anthem

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11122
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Tue May 23, 2023 10:17 am

San Lumen wrote:
The Two Jerseys wrote:What's wrong with the sheriffs telling the state to go pound sand and ignoring the law?


If you’re not going to follow the laws passed by the legislature elected in a free and fair election you have no business being sheriff.

“A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void.” - Marbury v. Madison (1803)

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11122
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Tue May 23, 2023 10:36 am

Lots of sand in vagina moments are probably happening right now within the doj and batfe(arbf)
BREAKING: Fifth Circuit Issues Injunction on ATF Pistol Stabilizing Brace Ban

Minutes ago, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a preliminary injunction (Link to preliminary injunction) against the DOJ’s and ATF’s unconstitutional attack on firearms equipped with a pistol stabilizing brace. The lawsuit, brought by the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and other plaintiffs, paid off with this injunction just days before ATF’s mandatory registration “grace period” that was set to expire on the 31st.

Then again, language in this preliminary injunction might mean it applies only to the named plaintiffs . . . “…Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in this case.” I’m no lawyer, nor do I generally play one on the internet, so I don’t know if that’s standard language or if it does actually restriction the injunction to these particular plaintiffs. Stay tuned, because we’re speaking with folks in the know and we’ll update this story shortly with more information as it becomes available.

User avatar
Gun Manufacturers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10141
Founded: Jan 23, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gun Manufacturers » Tue May 23, 2023 11:11 am

San Lumen wrote:
The Two Jerseys wrote:What's wrong with the sheriffs telling the state to go pound sand and ignoring the law?


If you’re not going to follow the laws passed by the legislature elected in a free and fair election you have no business being sheriff.


This, from the person who, in another thread, wants to violate the planning and zoning laws passed by the legislature elected in a free and fair election.

Not very consistent, are you?
Gun control is like trying to solve drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to own cars.

Any accident you can walk away from is one I can laugh at.

DOJ's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment: http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi ... -p0126.pdf

Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...


Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo


Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.


Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

User avatar
Gun Manufacturers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10141
Founded: Jan 23, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gun Manufacturers » Tue May 23, 2023 11:12 am

Grinning Dragon wrote:Lots of sand in vagina moments are probably happening right now within the doj and batfe(arbf)
BREAKING: Fifth Circuit Issues Injunction on ATF Pistol Stabilizing Brace Ban

Minutes ago, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a preliminary injunction (Link to preliminary injunction) against the DOJ’s and ATF’s unconstitutional attack on firearms equipped with a pistol stabilizing brace. The lawsuit, brought by the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and other plaintiffs, paid off with this injunction just days before ATF’s mandatory registration “grace period” that was set to expire on the 31st.

Then again, language in this preliminary injunction might mean it applies only to the named plaintiffs . . . “…Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in this case.” I’m no lawyer, nor do I generally play one on the internet, so I don’t know if that’s standard language or if it does actually restriction the injunction to these particular plaintiffs. Stay tuned, because we’re speaking with folks in the know and we’ll update this story shortly with more information as it becomes available.


I just heard about that from the Guntubers (Guns and Gadgets).
Gun control is like trying to solve drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to own cars.

Any accident you can walk away from is one I can laugh at.

DOJ's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment: http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi ... -p0126.pdf

Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...


Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo


Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.


Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11122
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Tue May 23, 2023 11:51 am

Gun Manufacturers wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:Lots of sand in vagina moments are probably happening right now within the doj and batfe(arbf)
BREAKING: Fifth Circuit Issues Injunction on ATF Pistol Stabilizing Brace Ban



I just heard about that from the Guntubers (Guns and Gadgets).

There's another one in the US District court for the district of North Dakota Western division.
That one is brought on by the Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition Inc. and joining them are the following states.
West Virginia
North Dakota
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
New Hampshire
Oklahoma
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Utah
Virginia
Last but not least; Wyoming

This one should be the next one to drop a ruling and we've been thinking this court might have been waiting on what the 5th circuit was going to rule and I think in this one this is where these states are going for the whole ball of wax and have the court issue a full injunction.
Last edited by Grinning Dragon on Tue May 23, 2023 11:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Gun Manufacturers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10141
Founded: Jan 23, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gun Manufacturers » Tue May 23, 2023 12:22 pm

Grinning Dragon wrote:
Gun Manufacturers wrote:
I just heard about that from the Guntubers (Guns and Gadgets).

There's another one in the US District court for the district of North Dakota Western division.
That one is brought on by the Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition Inc. and joining them are the following states.
West Virginia
North Dakota
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
New Hampshire
Oklahoma
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Utah
Virginia
Last but not least; Wyoming

This one should be the next one to drop a ruling and we've been thinking this court might have been waiting on what the 5th circuit was going to rule and I think in this one this is where these states are going for the whole ball of wax and have the court issue a full injunction.


That would be awesome. Not that I have a pistol brace, but I still vehemently disagree with the ATF rule. Especially since they gave authorization for it a decade ago, and now with millions in circulation, they're changing their minds.
Gun control is like trying to solve drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to own cars.

Any accident you can walk away from is one I can laugh at.

DOJ's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment: http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi ... -p0126.pdf

Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...


Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo


Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.


Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11122
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Tue May 23, 2023 12:40 pm

Gun Manufacturers wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:There's another one in the US District court for the district of North Dakota Western division.
That one is brought on by the Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition Inc. and joining them are the following states.
West Virginia
North Dakota
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
New Hampshire
Oklahoma
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Utah
Virginia
Last but not least; Wyoming

This one should be the next one to drop a ruling and we've been thinking this court might have been waiting on what the 5th circuit was going to rule and I think in this one this is where these states are going for the whole ball of wax and have the court issue a full injunction.


That would be awesome. Not that I have a pistol brace, but I still vehemently disagree with the ATF rule. Especially since they gave authorization for it a decade ago, and now with millions in circulation, they're changing their minds.


This along with the unlawful frames and receivers bullshit is coming from the guy that hates the lil people having a 2nd Amendment, if it weren't for his babysitters he probably doesn't even know whats going on.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87757
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue May 23, 2023 2:46 pm

Grinning Dragon wrote:
Gun Manufacturers wrote:
That would be awesome. Not that I have a pistol brace, but I still vehemently disagree with the ATF rule. Especially since they gave authorization for it a decade ago, and now with millions in circulation, they're changing their minds.


This along with the unlawful frames and receivers bullshit is coming from the guy that hates the lil people having a 2nd Amendment, if it weren't for his babysitters he probably doesn't even know whats going on.


You want zero gun laws whatsoever. If someone with a criminal record or mental health issues walked into a gun shop they should be allowed to buy a gun no questions asked.

User avatar
Arval Va
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1095
Founded: Mar 10, 2023
Ex-Nation

Postby Arval Va » Tue May 23, 2023 2:50 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:
This along with the unlawful frames and receivers bullshit is coming from the guy that hates the lil people having a 2nd Amendment, if it weren't for his babysitters he probably doesn't even know whats going on.


You want zero gun laws whatsoever. If someone with a criminal record or mental health issues walked into a gun shop they should be allowed to buy a gun no questions asked.

You've said this before. Please, we all know this won't convince them. Save everyone the trouble.
NATIONAL NEWS
Údhámvaer Oamvólól Arvalail: Cuon-Variovoal Ml. vapródhuith i gio marthoio amvafól érvósial | Málaosúodh Mv. cónmavórith úóniu ó máfrothor tiá maereth síl | Tua mardhohoídh voróe Párvodhasiavoról umvaorith tá eohoth goros | Ú iaodhrómóvoloal córvotho Coruices vadhrómith Dhuristihír amvás
National Report Arval: Dr. John Wario dies at the age of 72 | Arbiter Ahúmardh vindicated from wife's claims of adultery | The National Council's head chef attacked by large fishes | Minor volcanic eruption in Corui kills 3 tourists
FACTBOOK
ASEXUAL, ATHEIST, ANNOYANCE | HE/THEY | NSTATS NON-CANON

User avatar
Dylar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7116
Founded: Jan 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Dylar » Tue May 23, 2023 2:50 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:
This along with the unlawful frames and receivers bullshit is coming from the guy that hates the lil people having a 2nd Amendment, if it weren't for his babysitters he probably doesn't even know whats going on.


You want zero gun laws whatsoever. If someone with a criminal record or mental health issues walked into a gun shop they should be allowed to buy a gun no questions asked.

i mean yeah. an ideal society would reinstitute peoples' rights as soon as they are discharged from a mental health clinic or released from prison after demonstrating that they are fit to be reintegrated into society. otherwise, why would they be let out of such places to begin with?
Last edited by Dylar on Tue May 23, 2023 2:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
St. Albert the Great wrote:"Natural science does not consist in ratifying what others have said, but in seeking the causes of phenomena."
Franko Tildon wrote:Fire washes the skin off the bone and the sin off the soul. It cleans away the dirt. And my momma didn't raise herself no dirty boy.

Pro: Life, Catholic, religious freedom, guns
Against: gun control, abortion, militant atheism
Interests: Video Games, Military History, Catholic theology, Sci-Fi, and Table-Top Miniatures games
Favorite music genres: Metal, Drinking songs, Polka, Military Marches, Hardbass, and Movie/Video Game soundtracks

User avatar
Tarsonis
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31317
Founded: Sep 20, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tarsonis » Tue May 23, 2023 2:51 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:
This along with the unlawful frames and receivers bullshit is coming from the guy that hates the lil people having a 2nd Amendment, if it weren't for his babysitters he probably doesn't even know whats going on.


You want zero gun laws whatsoever. If someone with a criminal record or mental health issues walked into a gun shop they should be allowed to buy a gun no questions asked.


You won't trust them with a gun, but you'll trust them to vote?
NS Keyboard Warrior since 2005
Ecclesiastes 1:18 "For in much wisdom is much vexation, and those who increase knowledge increase sorrow"
Thucydides: “The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools.”
1 Corinthians 5:12 "What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside?"
Galatians 6:7 "Do not be deceived; God is not mocked, for you reap whatever you sow."
T. Stevens: "I don't hold with equality in all things, but I believe in equality under the Law."
James I of Aragon "Have you ever considered that our position is Idolatry to the Rabbi?"
Debating Christian Theology with Non-Christians pretty much anybody be like

User avatar
Paddy O Fernature
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13804
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Paddy O Fernature » Tue May 23, 2023 2:58 pm

Tarsonis wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
You want zero gun laws whatsoever. If someone with a criminal record or mental health issues walked into a gun shop they should be allowed to buy a gun no questions asked.


You won't trust them with a gun, but you'll trust them to vote?


"A vote has never hurt anyone before, unlike yer stupid pieces of metal!!!!!!" - Lumen, most likely.

Proud Co-Founder of The Axis Commonwealth - Would you like to know more?
SJW! Why? Some nobody on the internet who has never met me accused me of being one, so it absolutely MUST be true! *Nod Nod*

User avatar
Juansonia
Minister
 
Posts: 2316
Founded: Apr 01, 2022
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Juansonia » Tue May 23, 2023 3:01 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:This along with the unlawful frames and receivers bullshit is coming from the guy that hates the lil people having a 2nd Amendment, if it weren't for his babysitters he probably doesn't even know whats going on.
You want zero gun laws whatsoever. If someone with a criminal record or mental health issues walked into a gun shop they should be allowed to buy a gun no questions asked.
And how is that a bad thing?
Hatsune Miku > British Imperialism
IC: MT if you ignore some stuff(mostly flavor), stats are not canon. Embassy link.
OOC: Owns and (sometimes) wears a maid outfit, wants to pair it with a FN SCAR-L. He/Him/His
Kernen did nothing wrong.
Space Squid wrote:Each sin should get it's own month.

Right now, Pride gets June, and Greed, Envy, and Gluttony have to share Thanksgiving/Black Friday through Christmas, Sloth gets one day in September, and Lust gets one day in February.

It's not equitable at all
Gandoor wrote:Cliché: A mod making a reply that's full of swearing after someone asks if you're allowed to swear on this site.

It makes me chuckle every time it happens.
Brits mistake Miku for their Anthem

User avatar
Paddy O Fernature
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13804
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Paddy O Fernature » Tue May 23, 2023 3:04 pm

Juansonia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:You want zero gun laws whatsoever. If someone with a criminal record or mental health issues walked into a gun shop they should be allowed to buy a gun no questions asked.
And how is that a bad thing?


It scares Lumen.

Proud Co-Founder of The Axis Commonwealth - Would you like to know more?
SJW! Why? Some nobody on the internet who has never met me accused me of being one, so it absolutely MUST be true! *Nod Nod*

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11122
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Tue May 23, 2023 3:04 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:
This along with the unlawful frames and receivers bullshit is coming from the guy that hates the lil people having a 2nd Amendment, if it weren't for his babysitters he probably doesn't even know whats going on.


You want zero gun laws whatsoever. If someone with a criminal record or mental health issues walked into a gun shop they should be allowed to buy a gun no questions asked.

Why should someone who did their time not be allowed the most effective means to protect themselves? Are they not worthy of self defense? If that person is so dangerous why release them then? Do any of the current anti gun bullshit laws prevent any criminal from getting a firearm? The other question that needs to be asked, what if that person went to prison for a non violent crime and why should they be lumped in with those who were violent?
Mental health issues is a broad topic, care to pare it down?
Last edited by Grinning Dragon on Tue May 23, 2023 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
American Legionaries
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12473
Founded: Nov 03, 2021
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby American Legionaries » Tue May 23, 2023 3:05 pm

Arval Va wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
You want zero gun laws whatsoever. If someone with a criminal record or mental health issues walked into a gun shop they should be allowed to buy a gun no questions asked.

You've said this before. Please, we all know this won't convince them. Save everyone the trouble.


I mean, it convinced me that GD is a good person.

User avatar
Paddy O Fernature
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13804
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Paddy O Fernature » Tue May 23, 2023 3:07 pm

Grinning Dragon wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
You want zero gun laws whatsoever. If someone with a criminal record or mental health issues walked into a gun shop they should be allowed to buy a gun no questions asked.

Why should someone who did their time not be allowed the most effective means to protect themselves? Are they not worthy of self defense? If that person is so dangerous why release them then? Do any of the current anti gun bullshit laws prevent any criminal from getting a firearm? The other question that needs to be asked, what if that person went to prison for a non violent crime and why should the be lumped in with those who were violent?
Mental health issues is a broad topic, care to pare it down?


Already know the answer but ill state it anyway...

I'll go one step further and ask the question of why is it that commonly proposed AG laws only target law abiding citizens who have committed zero crimes for punishment and not target criminals like they should?
Last edited by Paddy O Fernature on Tue May 23, 2023 3:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Proud Co-Founder of The Axis Commonwealth - Would you like to know more?
SJW! Why? Some nobody on the internet who has never met me accused me of being one, so it absolutely MUST be true! *Nod Nod*

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11122
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Tue May 23, 2023 3:15 pm

Paddy O Fernature wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:Why should someone who did their time not be allowed the most effective means to protect themselves? Are they not worthy of self defense? If that person is so dangerous why release them then? Do any of the current anti gun bullshit laws prevent any criminal from getting a firearm? The other question that needs to be asked, what if that person went to prison for a non violent crime and why should the be lumped in with those who were violent?
Mental health issues is a broad topic, care to pare it down?


Already know the answer but ill state it anyway...

I'll go one step further and ask the question of why is it that commonly proposed AG laws only target law abiding citizens who have committed zero crimes for punishment and not target criminals like they should?

It's easier to create a whole new class of criminals than to deal with current crop of criminals and generate money for the prison system/state and the overall hatred of individuals daring to exercise an enumerated negative right that should only be reserved for the affluent. As stated before, gun control isn't about safety, it's about control of the populace as if were chattel
Last edited by Grinning Dragon on Tue May 23, 2023 3:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11122
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Wed May 24, 2023 4:23 pm

Here we have blumenthal & murphy being their usual dumb and dumber dipshit selves and have decided to introduce a bill to strip firearm manufacturers of their 1st Amendment rights, so much for "congress shall make no law"
Blumenthal, Murphy introduce bill targeting gun makers' advertising
“The gun industry uses irresponsible marketing tactics – even targeting kids with ads for lethal weapons – to sell as many firearms as possible because their sole focus is maximizing profits. This legislation takes a step toward holding firearm manufacturers and sellers accountable for their dangerous advertising practices,” said Murphy.

Duh, you dumbass, that's the point of advertising. As to targeting kids; well there is a youth firearm market that coincides with youth shooting sports.
So all in all, it's just marketing and what these two are doing is basically unconstitutional.

Then we have the KGB FBI going full retard and basically considering everyone who is for the 2nd Amendment, individual rights, etc a possible "Militia Violent Extremist (MVE)."
Ooo, scary.
Leaked Documents Show FBI’s Definition of a Militia Violent Extremist is YOU!
Fuck the FBI, time to defund it.

Last but not least, the Louisiana house passed their version of a permitless constitutional conceal carry bill with veto proof majority.
Veto-proof majority in Louisiana House approves constitutional carry
I do enjoy the emotional pleas some of these dipshits blather.
Rep. Mandie Landry, D-New Orleans, began her comments by reminding lawmakers Wednesday is the one-year anniversary of the Uvalde shooting and called on her colleagues to address gun violence.

What does that have to do with anything? Who gives a shit. So no laws restoring 2nd Amendment rights shouldn't be brought up because of a tragedy? Dumb fucking cunt.
Last edited by Grinning Dragon on Wed May 24, 2023 4:28 pm, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
American Legionaries
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12473
Founded: Nov 03, 2021
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby American Legionaries » Wed May 24, 2023 4:36 pm

Grinning Dragon wrote:Here we have blumenthal & murphy being their usual dumb and dumber dipshit selves and have decided to introduce a bill to strip firearm manufacturers of their 1st Amendment rights, so much for "congress shall make no law"
Blumenthal, Murphy introduce bill targeting gun makers' advertising
“The gun industry uses irresponsible marketing tactics – even targeting kids with ads for lethal weapons – to sell as many firearms as possible because their sole focus is maximizing profits. This legislation takes a step toward holding firearm manufacturers and sellers accountable for their dangerous advertising practices,” said Murphy.

Duh, you dumbass, that's the point of advertising. As to targeting kids; well there is a youth firearm market that coincides with youth shooting sports.
So all in all, it's just marketing and what these two are doing is basically unconstitutional.

Then we have the KGB FBI going full retard and basically considering everyone who is for the 2nd Amendment, individual rights, etc a possible "Militia Violent Extremist (MVE)."
Ooo, scary.
Leaked Documents Show FBI’s Definition of a Militia Violent Extremist is YOU!
Fuck the FBI, time to defund it.

Last but not least, the Louisiana house passed their version of a permitless constitutional conceal carry bill with veto proof majority.
Veto-proof majority in Louisiana House approves constitutional carry
I do enjoy the emotional pleas some of these dipshits blather.
Rep. Mandie Landry, D-New Orleans, began her comments by reminding lawmakers Wednesday is the one-year anniversary of the Uvalde shooting and called on her colleagues to address gun violence.

What does that have to do with anything? Who gives a shit. So no laws restoring 2nd Amendment rights shouldn't be brought up because of a tragedy? Dumb fucking cunt.


The FBI thing is old, but that doesn't make it any less awful.

User avatar
Tarsonis
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31317
Founded: Sep 20, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tarsonis » Wed May 24, 2023 4:40 pm

Grinning Dragon wrote:Here we have blumenthal & murphy being their usual dumb and dumber dipshit selves and have decided to introduce a bill to strip firearm manufacturers of their 1st Amendment rights, so much for "congress shall make no law"
Blumenthal, Murphy introduce bill targeting gun makers' advertising
“The gun industry uses irresponsible marketing tactics – even targeting kids with ads for lethal weapons – to sell as many firearms as possible because their sole focus is maximizing profits. This legislation takes a step toward holding firearm manufacturers and sellers accountable for their dangerous advertising practices,” said Murphy.

Duh, you dumbass, that's the point of advertising. As to targeting kids; well there is a youth firearm market that coincides with youth shooting sports.
So all in all, it's just marketing and what these two are doing is basically unconstitutional.

Then we have the KGB FBI going full retard and basically considering everyone who is for the 2nd Amendment, individual rights, etc a possible "Militia Violent Extremist (MVE)."
Ooo, scary.
Leaked Documents Show FBI’s Definition of a Militia Violent Extremist is YOU!
Fuck the FBI, time to defund it.

Last but not least, the Louisiana house passed their version of a permitless constitutional conceal carry bill with veto proof majority.
Veto-proof majority in Louisiana House approves constitutional carry
I do enjoy the emotional pleas some of these dipshits blather.
Rep. Mandie Landry, D-New Orleans, began her comments by reminding lawmakers Wednesday is the one-year anniversary of the Uvalde shooting and called on her colleagues to address gun violence.

What does that have to do with anything? Who gives a shit. So no laws restoring 2nd Amendment rights shouldn't be brought up because of a tragedy? Dumb fucking cunt.


Forgive me, but I'm gonna have to side with the FBI on this one.

For one, "Ammoland" isn't exactly an unbiased source, so I can't really trust their characterization of the FBI's notes.

secondly, the FBI isn't saying anyone who has these monikers/decals/etc are dyed in the will fascists, they're noting these are used by members of extremist groups. Just like Proud Boys and Oathkeepers likes to fly the Gadsden Flag. Is everyone who flies the flag a card carrying member? No. But we should still note that is a flag those groups like to use.
NS Keyboard Warrior since 2005
Ecclesiastes 1:18 "For in much wisdom is much vexation, and those who increase knowledge increase sorrow"
Thucydides: “The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools.”
1 Corinthians 5:12 "What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside?"
Galatians 6:7 "Do not be deceived; God is not mocked, for you reap whatever you sow."
T. Stevens: "I don't hold with equality in all things, but I believe in equality under the Law."
James I of Aragon "Have you ever considered that our position is Idolatry to the Rabbi?"
Debating Christian Theology with Non-Christians pretty much anybody be like

User avatar
Dimetrodon Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2987
Founded: Sep 21, 2022
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Dimetrodon Empire » Thu May 25, 2023 6:01 am

Paddy O Fernature wrote:
Tarsonis wrote:
You won't trust them with a gun, but you'll trust them to vote?


"A vote has never hurt anyone before, unlike yer stupid pieces of metal!!!!!!" - Lumen, most likely.

Aren't most guns used in crimes stolen?

Most criminals are not going to use a gun that they personally brought. Even if no gun control laws existed, there would still be a record of the transaction, and a criminal would not want that.
Flag by someone named AdmiralRA on Reddit. (No, I don't have a Reddit account)
Proud Socialist. Bisexual.From the river to the sea
████████████
████████████

George Orwell wrote:Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism, as I understand it.

Citizen & Deputy Speaker of The Rejected Realms; Scout in the Rejected Realms Army

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11122
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Thu May 25, 2023 7:25 am

Dimetrodon Empire wrote:
Paddy O Fernature wrote:
"A vote has never hurt anyone before, unlike yer stupid pieces of metal!!!!!!" - Lumen, most likely.

Aren't most guns used in crimes stolen?

Most criminals are not going to use a gun that they personally brought. Even if no gun control laws existed, there would still be a record of the transaction, and a criminal would not want that.

Theft, followed up with straw purchases.
Then there is the shitty part of where some locales will charge the owner of said firearm, if said stolen firearm was used in a crime. Nothing like being punished for being a victim of a crime.

User avatar
Kernen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9967
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kernen » Thu May 25, 2023 9:58 am

Arval Va wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
You want zero gun laws whatsoever. If someone with a criminal record or mental health issues walked into a gun shop they should be allowed to buy a gun no questions asked.

You've said this before. Please, we all know this won't convince them. Save everyone the trouble.

Of course it won't, we don't believe rights should be lessened without due process or curtailed after debts to society are paid.
From the throne of Khan Juk i'Behemoti, Juk Who-Is-The-Strength-of-the-Behemoth, Supreme Khan of the Ogres of Kernen. May the Khan ever drink the blood of his enemies!

Lawful Evil

Get abortions, do drugs, own guns, but never misstate legal procedure.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Eahland, Einaro, Fort Viorlia, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Infected Mushroom, Jibjibistan, Kostane, Liberal Malaysia, Mr TM, Nutskir, Platypus Bureaucracy, Rivogna, Statesburg, Stratonesia, Umeria

Advertisement

Remove ads