But I thought republicans loved privatisation ?????????
Advertisement
by Thanatttynia » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:37 pm
by NewVinlandia » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:37 pm
Keshiland wrote:Thsi decision is purely ethical in my opinion and I hope the courts decide abortion is a state issue and not a federal issue
by Katganistan » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:38 pm
by Neutraligon » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:38 pm
by New haven america » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:39 pm
by Keshiland » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:39 pm
by Genivaria » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:40 pm
Keshiland wrote:Genivaria wrote:That seems to be the case for most pro-lifers I talk to.
At least im a real pro life. I support immigration, gun control, financial aid for parents and their kids. I support free college free health care and want the general welfare of children to be good. Would adopt if I had the means.
by Keshiland » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:40 pm
by NeuPolska » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:40 pm
The Islands of Versilia wrote:Besides, this world needs less humans, not more. Abortions should be encouraged with adoption also heavily encouraged.
Kar-Esseria wrote:Who is that and are they female because if not then they can go make love to their hand.
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Go home Polska wins NS.
United Mongol Hordes wrote:Polska isn't exactly the nicest guy in the world
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Hurd you miss the point more than Polska misses Poland.
Rhodesialund wrote:when you have Charlie ten feet away or something operating operationally.
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Gayla is living in 1985 but these guys are already in 1916
by New haven america » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:41 pm
by Sovaal » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:41 pm
by Keshiland » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:43 pm
New haven america wrote:Keshiland wrote:
1.well the 1st one is because you have to give some to win in the long run the other 2.because the mothers LIFE is more important. You can't ask someone to kill them selves for others.
1. Glad you admit your hypocrisy
2. Then they should be allowed to have an abortion anytime they need
by Neutraligon » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:44 pm
by Sovaal » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:45 pm
by Keshiland » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:45 pm
Neutraligon wrote:So anyone else think this runs afoul of the undue burden portion of the Supreme Court ruling?
by Keshiland » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:46 pm
by Genivaria » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:47 pm
Neutraligon wrote:So anyone else think this runs afoul of the undue burden portion of the Supreme Court ruling?
Keshiland wrote:Neutraligon wrote:So anyone else think this runs afoul of the undue burden portion of the Supreme Court ruling?
no because if they are not at the highest standards people could get hurt or die. They need to be at hospital standards to provide hospital care. If you can admit people like a hosbital you should have to be at the level of a hosbital.
by New haven america » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:47 pm
by Neutraligon » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:48 pm
Keshiland wrote:Neutraligon wrote:So anyone else think this runs afoul of the undue burden portion of the Supreme Court ruling?
no because if they are not at the highest standards people could get hurt or die. They need to be at hospital standards to provide hospital care. If you can admit people like a hosbital you should have to be at the level of a hosbital.
by Sovaal » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:48 pm
by Keshiland » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:48 pm
Genivaria wrote:Neutraligon wrote:So anyone else think this runs afoul of the undue burden portion of the Supreme Court ruling?
Yep.Keshiland wrote:
no because if they are not at the highest standards people could get hurt or die. They need to be at hospital standards to provide hospital care. If you can admit people like a hosbital you should have to be at the level of a hosbital.
No they don't cut the shit.
by Genivaria » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:48 pm
by New haven america » Fri Sep 08, 2017 3:48 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ariddia, Benuty, Deblar, Dumb Ideologies, El Lazaro, Elwher, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ethel mermania, Fartsniffage, Forsher, HISPIDA, Ifreann, Kerwa, Mardesurria, Pale Dawn
Advertisement