by Mathuvan Union » Thu Jun 25, 2020 2:07 pm
by United England n Wales » Thu Jun 25, 2020 2:16 pm
Mathuvan Union wrote:https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=487664&p=37326698#p37326698
by Sedgistan » Thu Jun 25, 2020 2:20 pm
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Thu Jun 25, 2020 2:27 pm
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Mathuvan Union » Thu Jun 25, 2020 4:12 pm
Sedgistan wrote:It's really not. Read the rules: viewtopic.php?f=16&t=260044
by WayNeacTia » Thu Jun 25, 2020 4:26 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Katganistan » Thu Jun 25, 2020 4:29 pm
Mathuvan Union wrote:Sedgistan wrote:It's really not. Read the rules: viewtopic.php?f=16&t=260044
I would like a second moderators opinion on this, I got a slap on the wrist for saying ‘they should get their heads checked out’ but when someone says we (Old Zealand) can’t read they get ways with it
by WayNeacTia » Thu Jun 25, 2020 4:34 pm
Grenartia wrote:Saiwania wrote:A Nazi mod is valid in my opinion, provided their posting history is 100% clean.
Of course the forum's resident nazi would say that.Only its impossible to abide by the established rules here whilst still adhering to neo-Nazism as an ideology generally speaking.
That's a fundamentally good thing.The only other barriers are perhaps Max himself and [violet] and any existing Moderators and precedents as it applies to their ranks in terms of people they accept.
Hence, the only way I see it happening is if neo-Nazi sentiments were never expressed here to begin with. They certainly can't be neo-Nazi in alignment openly, even if given power if they want to keep it.
Tell me. If you were a mod, would you deem it actionable if a poster said "Gas the Jews, race war now!"?
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Mathuvan Union » Fri Jun 26, 2020 5:49 am
Katganistan wrote:Mathuvan Union wrote:I would like a second moderators opinion on this, I got a slap on the wrist for saying ‘they should get their heads checked out’ but when someone says we (Old Zealand) can’t read they get ways with it
Second opinion: it's not flaming.
"Why do you not understand" vs "is there something wrong with you mentally."
One is not flaming or baiting, the other one is.
Users browsing this forum: Bovad