by Miku the Based » Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:40 am
by Shazbotdom » Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:48 am
by Sedgistan » Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:56 am
by Miku the Based » Tue Apr 20, 2021 5:53 pm
Sedgistan wrote:Don't waste our time with stupid questions, Miku the Based. If you're not going to take the time to read and understand Moderators' posts, then it's about time you stopped posting in Moderation.
by Frisbeeteria » Tue Apr 20, 2021 6:28 pm
Miku the Based wrote:I did not post this in moderation
by Jebslund » Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:19 pm
Miku the Based wrote:Sedgistan wrote:Don't waste our time with stupid questions, Miku the Based. If you're not going to take the time to read and understand Moderators' posts, then it's about time you stopped posting in Moderation.
I did not post this in moderation. It was moved there by someone.
Also, there was link to porn site on there, must be blind.
Frisbeeteria wrote:Jebslund wrote:To expand, would linking to sites with NSFW sections (or other readily accessible NSFW material) be a violation of PG-13 even if the linked pages are free of such content?
You know we don't rule on hypotheticals. We can't make a generalized ruling that applies to all cases. Some time ago, someone posted a link to some "educational topic" on Pornhub. While the link itself did not have any specific offensive content, the rest of the site (including all links) was devoted exclusively to pornography. That was ruled not acceptable.
by Miku the Based » Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:43 pm
© 2005-2021 Frost Dragon Art LLC
by Jebslund » Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:01 pm
Miku the Based wrote:I'm going to get banned for posting links to porn but it's on the linked page, you don't need a account to see it. Hint: it's immediately after© 2005-2021 Frost Dragon Art LLC
Not falling for the ploy and I trust you have eyes.
by Aikoland » Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:40 pm
by Miku the Based » Wed Apr 21, 2021 2:59 am
Aikoland wrote: it does not have any form of pornographic advertisement, much less pornographic advertisements when viewing SFW images.
Seriously trying to treat FurAffinity as equivalent to an actual porn site by the OP is completely disingenuous.
by The New California Republic » Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:11 am
by Miku the Based » Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:52 am
The New California Republic wrote:Miku the Based wrote:Straight up a lie.
Turned off my adblock and refreshed the main page of that particular site multiple times to generate new ads. Not seeing a single ad that contains any explicit pornographic images, nor any actual site content that is pornographic. Either you are visiting a totally different site or your interpretation of what is classed as "pornographic" is skewed.
by Jebslund » Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:55 am
Miku the Based wrote:Aikoland wrote: it does not have any form of pornographic advertisement, much less pornographic advertisements when viewing SFW images.
Straight up a lie.Seriously trying to treat FurAffinity as equivalent to an actual porn site by the OP is completely disingenuous.
Explain. When the link itself contains porn on the webpage I assume it is porn site or host porn content.
(édit: they do in fact advertise nsfw links that is hosted on FurAffinity website on that sfw link, much in the same way any porn site advertise nsfw links hosted on their own website even if original link does not contain any of such offending content. They have ads that link to https://rv.FurAffinity.net/live/... It's hosted by them and is on sfw links, you don't need a account to see them like I said before)
Miku the Based wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Turned off my adblock and refreshed the main page of that particular site multiple times to generate new ads. Not seeing a single ad that contains any explicit pornographic images, nor any actual site content that is pornographic. Either you are visiting a totally different site or your interpretation of what is classed as "pornographic" is skewed.
Damn it, fine I'll fall for your ploy. Here's one of the examples.
[redacted for obvious reasons]
Miku the Based wrote:Mods feel free to delete the link. I'm dealing with disingenuous users here and this is proof. They all advertise as nsfw. I'm tired of the damn gaslighting.
by The New California Republic » Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:57 am
Miku the Based wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Turned off my adblock and refreshed the main page of that particular site multiple times to generate new ads. Not seeing a single ad that contains any explicit pornographic images, nor any actual site content that is pornographic. Either you are visiting a totally different site or your interpretation of what is classed as "pornographic" is skewed.
Damn it, fine I'll fall for your ploy. Here's one of the examples.
https://rv.furaffinity.net/live/www/del ... osacake%2F
Mods feel free to delete the link. I'm dealing with disingenuous users here and this is proof.
by Miku the Based » Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:57 am
by The New California Republic » Wed Apr 21, 2021 4:09 am
by Aikoland » Wed Apr 21, 2021 4:44 am
by Miku the Based » Wed Apr 21, 2021 6:04 am
by The Dodo Republic » Wed Apr 21, 2021 6:07 am
by Aikoland » Wed Apr 21, 2021 6:24 am
by Nepleslia » Wed Apr 21, 2021 6:40 am
Miku the Based wrote:Hamatu wrote:Wouldn't posting a link to a screenshot of what you're seeing work as possible evidence or proof?
I don't want copyright claim by these artists itching for a dmca so I'll be more specific and link to the some offending images in the external link I listed above. Mods are free to redact these links as well.
https://www.furaffinity.net/view/40711789/ remember the time you banned a user for hosting ahegao faces in NS, I don't but someone mentioned that to me when my original account got deleted for a word considered obscene.
https://www.furaffinity.net/view/24233924/ displaying genitalia does not seem pg-13, but I don't know, depends on how the authority figure feels at moment.
https://www.furaffinity.net/view/34246562/ something masturbating. I'm not sure if this is acceptable to host on this site much less link to a website that host it.
I guess I'm crazy and all of this is my imagination or that I'm infected with some malware like my detractors like to think.
The Dodo Republic wrote:Furry porn.. I’m against this already.
by Grenartia » Wed Apr 21, 2021 2:53 pm
Aikoland wrote:People being stupid and not labelling the stuff they post under the correct age rating doesn't make the site a pornographic website, it just means the users are stupid and don't know how to appropriately rate their art.
I can fucking search for 'breasts' on DeviantArt while having my account set to hide mature content and literally get shit I'd definitely say should be classified as mature, but I'm not gonna sit here like a goddamn maroon and claim that DEVIANTART IS A PORN SITE AND I SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO LINK TO PORNHUB VIDEOS IF PEOPLE CAN LINK TO THEIR DEVIANTART because, again, unlike a hentai website, websites like FurAffinity nor DeviantArt are not dedicated to pornography nor do they have actual fucking advertisements for pornographic websites or games on them.
Nepleslia wrote:Miku the Based wrote:I don't want copyright claim by these artists itching for a dmca so I'll be more specific and link to the some offending images in the external link I listed above. Mods are free to redact these links as well.
[redacted] remember the time you banned a user for hosting ahegao faces in NS, I don't but someone mentioned that to me when my original account got deleted for a word considered obscene.
[redacted] displaying genitalia does not seem pg-13, but I don't know, depends on how the authority figure feels at moment.
[redacted] something masturbating. I'm not sure if this is acceptable to host on this site much less link to a website that host it.
I guess I'm crazy and all of this is my imagination or that I'm infected with some malware like my detractors like to think.
As someone who viewed all three of these links on their phone - which I’m going to have to burnalong with my eyesnow that it’s been contaminated - I can confirm that there is no malware/link redirecting/etc. involved.The Dodo Republic wrote:Furry porn.. I’m against this already.
IKR? It’s unironically sad that this discussion even needs to take place - IMO if a site can’t be bothered to filter its content, it shouldn’t be linked to on NS given that there are minors who actively participate on this site - but NS will be NS and mods will be mods, so... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
by United Republic Empire » Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:51 pm
by The New California Republic » Wed Apr 21, 2021 4:02 pm
Grenartia wrote:Also, you can find porn pretty easily on Twitter, does that mean linking to even SFW posts from there should earn anyone an automatic ban?
by Grenartia » Wed Apr 21, 2021 4:37 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Grenartia wrote:Also, you can find porn pretty easily on Twitter, does that mean linking to even SFW posts from there should earn anyone an automatic ban?
Tbh using the train of thought that Miku is using, then even free image hosting sites that people regularly use on the forums, like imgbb and postimages for instance, would be verboten, as I'm sure if I did a trawl of both of them then I could find something on them that'd be pushing or breaking PG-13. The reasoning being used is absurd.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Mr MT
Advertisement