Advertisement
by Connopolis » Mon Jan 02, 2012 10:40 am
From the office of,
Mrs. Pamela Howell
GA Ambassador of the Connopolian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
by Connopolis » Mon Jan 02, 2012 10:41 am
Bears Armed wrote:Might it be too dark to work with the 'Dark' theme?
From the office of,
Mrs. Pamela Howell
GA Ambassador of the Connopolian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:12 am
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:14 am
by Ranbo » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:15 am
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:What precisely is wrong with the condemnation badge? I always thought it looked cool. Much better than the Commendation one, at any rate. I'd actually have to actively campaign to repeal my own badge if it was changed, particularly to the somewhat crappy design proposed here.
by Frisbeeteria » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:34 am
Ranbo wrote:It's called idea evolution.
Would the badge change affect all previously condemned nations or just future condemned ones?
by Katganistan » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:38 am
by Flibbleites » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:39 am
by Ranbo » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:40 am
Frisbeeteria wrote:Would the badge change affect all previously condemned nations or just future condemned ones?
If [violet] chose to adopt this change, the most likely effect would be to simply replace the old image file with the new. All calls to that image would hit the same file, old and new alike.
by Jordsindia » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:43 am
by Ranbo » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:44 am
Jordsindia wrote:Make it ugly, so people don't want to be condemned.
by -The West Coast- » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:47 am
Eist wrote:Oooh. It's nice, but do you have a larger version on hand?
by Jordsindia » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:47 am
by -The West Coast- » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:48 am
by San Leggera » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:50 am
by -The West Coast- » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:53 am
San Leggera wrote:I really don't think a redesign is necessary, a recreation of it in a less pixelated format maybe, but it's fine as is.
by Greater Tezdrian » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:54 am
by BrightonBurg » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:57 am
by San Leggera » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:59 am
Isn't that part of its purpose?-The West Coast- wrote:currently the badge is ugly.
Recreating this image in a less pixelated format would take care of these issuesit's too bright, i can hardly make the symbol out.
Personal preference.this re-design is perfect, it's dark, mean and is definitely a badge that would make people think twice before doing condemn-able actions.
by -The West Coast- » Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:08 pm
San Leggera wrote:Isn't that part of its purpose?-The West Coast- wrote:currently the badge is ugly.Recreating this image in a less pixelated format would take care of these issuesit's too bright, i can hardly make the symbol out.Personal preference.this re-design is perfect, it's dark, mean and is definitely a badge that would make people think twice before doing condemn-able actions.
by Augustus Este » Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:29 pm
by -The West Coast- » Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:32 pm
Augustus Este wrote:I'm not quiet sure what that red blob is in the background, but other than that it looks better than the current one, which to be honest looks really blurry and hastily made
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Herzikland
Advertisement