Australian rePublic wrote:If anyone's interested, I would like to create a few chain issues. In order to undertake such a collosal task, I would need many co-authors helping me. I have a couple of ideas.
1. @@NAME@@ losing its access to its coastline, and dealing with the consequences of being landlocked? This chain will temporirly make issues about coastlines unavaliable, and the chain will end with @@NAME@@ regaining her coastline
2. A currency union. Other countries have a currency called the @@CURRENCY@@. All these countries get together and print a @@NEW@@ currency for everyone. Everytime the currency union is abandoned, @@NAME@@ will reissue the @@CURRENCY@@ and cut off other users
What do you think?
No offence Aussie, but while you're a great author filled with great ideas, your low level of consistency and limited ability to self-edit (both in grammar and in flow of prose) makes it very unlikely any Editor would want to publish or work on a chain led by yourself. Even me and NoQ needed a lot of team input to get our chains into a form that could be published, and we're both much more entrenched in issue creation than you are.
If you want to get the pseudo-chain experience, why not try writing some issues that occur as consequences to specific issue options? Pick an existing issue option that sounds like it could lead to a sequential narrative, and show us the skills you have at chain-building. Once you've done that well and consistently half a dozen times, we can reconsider whether you're able to create a chain.