Not how it works
Advertisement
by Fauxia » Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:04 pm
Not how it works
by Australian rePublic » Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:23 pm
by Fauxia » Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:26 pm
Speaking of that, I’m a go bump the issue I’m co-authoring with you.Australian Republic wrote:Anyone wanna co-author an issue about bike sharing?
by Jutsa » Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:27 pm
by Singapore no2 » Tue Nov 28, 2017 6:41 pm
Jutsa wrote:I seem to remember already seeing a draft about something like that, but I have no idea what happened to it. The topic doesn't really grasp me, I'm afraid.
This is a Modern-Tech nation. We only put a satellite and a man into space so far.
We are a Middle power, so if we die, so will some of the global economy.
We have the 8th largest sovereign wealth fund in the world. (RL world)
Pro: Regulations, Military, Law and Order
Anti: Freedom of speech, Discrimination, CHEWING GUM
Just so you know, I don't think like that. That stuff is roleplaying Singapore (itself, the real life nation)
Fauxia wrote:Editors aren’t real people.
by Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Nov 29, 2017 5:25 am
by The Marsupial Illuminati » Wed Nov 29, 2017 7:18 am
by Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Nov 29, 2017 8:19 am
by Jutsa » Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:21 am
by Trotterdam » Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:05 am
by Jutsa » Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:44 am
by Trotterdam » Wed Nov 29, 2017 4:54 pm
by Socio Polor » Wed Nov 29, 2017 5:45 pm
USS Monitor wrote:Socio Polor wrote:Snip
A key phrase in that post was "without a proven track record." If someone doesn't have a track record of being easy to work with, that doesn't necessarily mean they are a pain in the ass. It can also mean they haven't done enough to build up a track record of any kind.
FWIW, I shouldn't be writing chains either because I don't have enough issues experience and my attention span is too short.
And right this minute I shouldn't be writing much of anything because it's 3AM, I had a long day, and I'm starting to get snoozy.
by Jutsa » Wed Nov 29, 2017 6:15 pm
by Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Nov 29, 2017 6:29 pm
Jutsa wrote:Say, I have a question. Should I add "implements/removes X policy" to my draft options, should I not, or does it matter?
by Jutsa » Wed Nov 29, 2017 8:15 pm
by Pogaria » Thu Nov 30, 2017 6:30 pm
Jutsa wrote:Would an issue for world assembly nations that have not voted on anything for a rather long time be a) an interesting idea and b) possible?
(It also would be interesting to see what a dictatorship would have to say about the subject)
by Jutsa » Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:20 pm
by Bears Armed » Fri Dec 01, 2017 11:12 am
Trotterdam wrote:It's shameful how little Social "Darwinists" and other eugenicists actually understand about Darwinian evolution.
by Shwe Tu Colony » Sat Dec 02, 2017 12:35 am
by Amjedia » Sat Dec 02, 2017 3:13 am
by USS Monitor » Sat Dec 02, 2017 3:22 am
Amjedia wrote:Hello!
I'm thinking of writing an issue for vegetarian nations that is not about reversing it as suggested by Nation of Quebec. What do you think?
by Jutsa » Sat Dec 02, 2017 8:49 am
by Trotterdam » Sat Dec 02, 2017 11:04 am
by Jutsa » Sat Dec 02, 2017 11:16 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement