So why - in the interests of transparency, at least - were we not told who the other two were?
Advertisement
by Tinhampton » Tue Jun 16, 2020 12:57 am
by Nouveau Quebecois » Tue Jun 16, 2020 2:24 pm
by Nouveau Quebecois » Fri Jun 26, 2020 7:27 am
The Tribunus Review
Breaking News - Farkas Sentiments on the ElectionsAttention, Attention, Farkasfalkan Community.
"The position of Earl in Farkasfalka has ever since its creation been the commoner's wing, so to speak, of our region's administration. The use of elections at a minimal level has allowed for the members of Farkasfalka to elect representatives to deal with the relevant, however, less pressing issues of Farkasfalkan society. Of course, for the pressing and urgent issues the region faces, myself and my Primors who I hand pick are ready to handle. Overall, Farkasfalka through this method of governance has seen a stable, positive trend in development in areas from nation-count to activity as a region in NationStates.
As for the newly elected earls, I send my congratulations! Yebloin, who I believe we have all known for some time, has given us continuously wonderful readings from the many books of the Bible and more, allowing us to reflect upon the Lord's word and His intentions for us, His humble servants, more often. Terra Gloria Sanctus and Oliverlandiana have both joined recently, as within a matter of only a few months. It is within this short time, however, that they have contributed plenty of activity on the RMB and regional discord. These two new nations have a reputation to build and thus far it is well under way. I am excited to see how they continue!
It is my belief that from their service as government members we will all benefit -- the new servers and the served. I am optimistic of the future and how its events will be handled by this new administration."
- Király Farkas Vilmos I
Stay tuned to the Farkasfalka Regional Thread for further updates.Lehet a Farkasfalka Diadal!
by Xoriet » Fri Jun 26, 2020 8:38 am
by Tinhampton » Fri Jun 26, 2020 9:15 am
by Nouveau Quebecois » Fri Jun 26, 2020 10:49 am
Xoriet wrote:Speaking of Farkasfalka and NQ in particular, do any of you care to explain this tidbit from the Moderation subforum?
viewtopic.php?p=37310615#p37310615
(Image)
by Nouveau Quebecois » Fri Jun 26, 2020 10:51 am
Tinhampton wrote:1 day 11 hours ago: The National Syndicated Fiefdom of Kustonia deleted a regional poll.
1 day 12 hours ago: The Holy Empire of Terra Gloria Sanctus created a new regional poll: "Who gets visa priority for the ethnostate?".
Yes, Farkasfalka, you just voted this guy in I assume... the first Earl election poll (which TGS appears to have won) was deleted before its conclusion
by Xoriet » Fri Jun 26, 2020 11:18 am
Nouveau Quebecois wrote:Xoriet wrote:Speaking of Farkasfalka and NQ in particular, do any of you care to explain this tidbit from the Moderation subforum?
viewtopic.php?p=37310615#p37310615
(Image)
That's a statement I made on my own behalf. If you'd like to debate my morality then you may do so in my telegrams.
by Nouveau Quebecois » Fri Jun 26, 2020 12:45 pm
Xoriet wrote:Rule One of Regional Government: You lose the ability to express an individual opinion without your region taking the heat for your statements for the entirety of your term. Especially when implying that doxxing is okay as long as it doesn’t happen onsite. You know, given what we learned about Farkasfalka and CCD’s private chat and what you people suggested.
by Jar Wattinree » Fri Jun 26, 2020 2:05 pm
Nouveau Quebecois wrote:Xoriet wrote:Rule One of Regional Government: You lose the ability to express an individual opinion without your region taking the heat for your statements for the entirety of your term. Especially when implying that doxxing is okay as long as it doesn’t happen onsite. You know, given what we learned about Farkasfalka and CCD’s private chat and what you people suggested.
That sounds more like your rule, because Farkasfalka doesn't have any documents stating it's residents or officials are required to give up their personal freedom of expression, bear reasons of ToS and spam.
by WayNeacTia » Fri Jun 26, 2020 2:19 pm
Xoriet wrote:Nouveau Quebecois wrote:That's a statement I made on my own behalf. If you'd like to debate my morality then you may do so in my telegrams.
Rule One of Regional Government: You lose the ability to express an individual opinion without your region taking the heat for your statements for the entirety of your term. Especially when implying that doxxing is okay as long as it doesn’t happen onsite. You know, given what we learned about Farkasfalka and CCD’s private chat and what you people suggested.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Nouveau Quebecois » Sat Jun 27, 2020 1:40 pm
Jar Wattinree wrote:This is a fact of foreign affairs universal in this game of politics and words. That you choose to disregard this will be to your detriment, not that Farkasfalka has a good name or reputation to begin with.
by Nouveau Quebecois » Sat Jun 27, 2020 1:42 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Xoriet wrote:Rule One of Regional Government: You lose the ability to express an individual opinion without your region taking the heat for your statements for the entirety of your term. Especially when implying that doxxing is okay as long as it doesn’t happen onsite. You know, given what we learned about Farkasfalka and CCD’s private chat and what you people suggested.
According to NQ the mods are all corrupt as well, [...]
by Yokiria » Sat Jun 27, 2020 1:52 pm
Nouveau Quebecois wrote:we've taken the 'don't lynch people because of their politics' route, however unpopular that may be.
by Nouveau Quebecois » Sat Jun 27, 2020 1:58 pm
by Drop Your Pants » Sat Jun 27, 2020 2:01 pm
Nouveau Quebecois wrote:We'll take the personal freedoms route, just like we've taken the 'don't lynch people because of their politics' route, however unpopular that may be.
by Yokiria » Sat Jun 27, 2020 2:43 pm
by Nouveau Quebecois » Sat Jun 27, 2020 4:33 pm
by Vungar » Sat Jun 27, 2020 11:18 pm
Xoriet wrote:Nouveau Quebecois wrote:That's a statement I made on my own behalf. If you'd like to debate my morality then you may do so in my telegrams.
Rule One of Regional Government: You lose the ability to express an individual opinion without your region taking the heat for your statements for the entirety of your term. Especially when implying that doxxing is okay as long as it doesn’t happen onsite. You know, given what we learned about Farkasfalka and CCD’s private chat and what you people suggested.
Founder and Király Farkas of Farkasfalka and the Farkas Lovagok
_________ | _________ | _________ | _________ | _________
by Honeydewistania » Sat Jun 27, 2020 11:22 pm
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Jar Wattinree » Sun Jun 28, 2020 3:55 am
Honeydewistania wrote:Why are we arguing with fascists? Just ignore them until Vungar inevitably ceases to exist then we can start noticing this hellhole again
by Xoriet » Sun Jun 28, 2020 4:49 am
Honeydewistania wrote:Why are we arguing with fascists? Just ignore them until Vungar inevitably ceases to exist then we can start noticing this hellhole again
by Nouveau Quebecois » Sun Jun 28, 2020 2:55 pm
Xoriet wrote:Honeydewistania wrote:Why are we arguing with fascists? Just ignore them until Vungar inevitably ceases to exist then we can start noticing this hellhole again
Mostly because I'm curious when they decided it was cool for government members to implicitly condone doxxing as long as it happens offsite. And I hope I'm mistaken, but apparently that is now being described as a political opinion. I wasn't aware that community safety had anything to do with politics.
by Great Algerstonia » Sun Jun 28, 2020 3:15 pm
Nouveau Quebecois wrote:Xoriet wrote:Mostly because I'm curious when they decided it was cool for government members to implicitly condone doxxing as long as it happens offsite. And I hope I'm mistaken, but apparently that is now being described as a political opinion. I wasn't aware that community safety had anything to do with politics.
What happens offsite has nothing to do with community safety.
Resilient Acceleration wrote:After a period of letting this discussion run its course without my involvement due to sheer laziness and a new related NS project, I have returned with an answer and that answer is Israel.
by Jar Wattinree » Sun Jun 28, 2020 3:21 pm
Nouveau Quebecois wrote:Xoriet wrote:Mostly because I'm curious when they decided it was cool for government members to implicitly condone doxxing as long as it happens offsite. And I hope I'm mistaken, but apparently that is now being described as a political opinion. I wasn't aware that community safety had anything to do with politics.
What happens offsite has nothing to do with community safety.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement