Order - Fatherland - Family | Farkasfalka Regional Thread!

[Tinhampton]

There are very clearly four candidates for Earl. Three Earls must be elected. It follows that at least one of Oliverlandiana and Cossack Khanate will be elected as an Earl.

There are six candidates [...]

So why - in the interests of transparency, at least - were we not told who the other two were?

[Nouveau Quebecois]

There are six candidates [...]

So why - in the interests of transparency, at least - were we not told who the other two were?

You can full a full list of candidates on our regional page.

[Nouveau Quebecois]

The Tribunus Review

---

Breaking News - Farkas Sentiments on the Elections

---

Attention, Attention, Farkasfalkan Community.

---

A Message From

Farkas Vungar

---

"The position of Earl in Farkasfalka has ever since its creation been the commoner's wing, so to speak, of our region's administration. The use of elections at a minimal level has allowed for the members of Farkasfalka to elect representatives to deal with the relevant, however, less pressing issues of Farkasfalkan society. Of course, for the pressing and urgent issues the region faces, myself and my Primors who I hand pick are ready to handle. Overall, Farkasfalka through this method of governance has seen a stable, positive trend in development in areas from nation-count to activity as a region in NationStates.

As for the newly elected earls, I send my congratulations! Yebloin, who I believe we have all known for some time, has given us continuously wonderful readings from the many books of the Bible and more, allowing us to reflect upon the Lord's word and His intentions for us, His humble servants, more often. Terra Gloria Sanctus and Oliverlandiana have both joined recently, as within a matter of only a few months. It is within this short time, however, that they have contributed plenty of activity on the RMB and regional discord. These two new nations have a reputation to build and thus far it is well under way. I am excited to see how they continue!

It is my belief that from their service as government members we will all benefit -- the new servers and the served. I am optimistic of the future and how its events will be handled by this new administration."

- Király Farkas Vilmos I

Stay tuned to the Farkasfalka Regional Thread for further updates.

---

Lehet a Farkasfalka Diadal!

[Xoriet]

Speaking of Farkasfalka and NQ in particular, do any of you care to explain this tidbit from the Moderation subforum?

viewtopic.php?p=37310615#p37310615

[Tinhampton]

1 day 11 hours ago: The National Syndicated Fiefdom of Kustonia deleted a regional poll.
1 day 12 hours ago: The Holy Empire of Terra Gloria Sanctus created a new regional poll: "Who gets visa priority for the ethnostate?".

Yes, Farkasfalka, you just voted this guy in I assume... the first Earl election poll (which TGS appears to have won) was deleted before its conclusion

[Nouveau Quebecois]

Speaking of Farkasfalka and NQ in particular, do any of you care to explain this tidbit from the Moderation subforum?

viewtopic.php?p=37310615#p37310615

(Image)

That's a statement I made on my own behalf. If you'd like to debate my morality then you may do so in my telegrams.

[Nouveau Quebecois]

1 day 11 hours ago: The National Syndicated Fiefdom of Kustonia deleted a regional poll.
1 day 12 hours ago: The Holy Empire of Terra Gloria Sanctus created a new regional poll: "Who gets visa priority for the ethnostate?".

Yes, Farkasfalka, you just voted this guy in I assume... the first Earl election poll (which TGS appears to have won) was deleted before its conclusion

Yes, riding a 'victor's high', our newest Earl made a most unprofessional joke. He has been reprimanded accordingly.

[Xoriet]

Speaking of Farkasfalka and NQ in particular, do any of you care to explain this tidbit from the Moderation subforum?

viewtopic.php?p=37310615#p37310615

(Image)

That's a statement I made on my own behalf. If you'd like to debate my morality then you may do so in my telegrams.

Rule One of Regional Government: You lose the ability to express an individual opinion without your region taking the heat for your statements for the entirety of your term. Especially when implying that doxxing is okay as long as it doesn’t happen onsite. You know, given what we learned about Farkasfalka and CCD’s private chat and what you people suggested.

[Nouveau Quebecois]

Rule One of Regional Government: You lose the ability to express an individual opinion without your region taking the heat for your statements for the entirety of your term. Especially when implying that doxxing is okay as long as it doesn’t happen onsite. You know, given what we learned about Farkasfalka and CCD’s private chat and what you people suggested.

That sounds more like your rule, because Farkasfalka doesn't have any documents stating it's residents or officials are required to give up their personal freedom of expression, bear reasons of ToS and spam.

Furthermore, I did not imply that 'doxxing was okay' and that can clearly be determined by the context of the conversation, but if you refuse to take this to my telegrams instead of our regional thread, I guess you are free to interpret whatever you want, your own way.

Lastly, and this is on behalf of our region, you can forgo evidence all you want but the fact of the matter is that there is nothing incriminating Farkasfalka, or any member of our government to doxxing of both the onsite or offsite variety, and I think you already know this.

[Jar Wattinree]

Rule One of Regional Government: You lose the ability to express an individual opinion without your region taking the heat for your statements for the entirety of your term. Especially when implying that doxxing is okay as long as it doesn’t happen onsite. You know, given what we learned about Farkasfalka and CCD’s private chat and what you people suggested.

That sounds more like your rule, because Farkasfalka doesn't have any documents stating it's residents or officials are required to give up their personal freedom of expression, bear reasons of ToS and spam.

This is a fact of foreign affairs universal in this game of politics and words. That you choose to disregard this will be to your detriment, not that Farkasfalka has a good name or reputation to begin with.

[WayNeacTia]

That's a statement I made on my own behalf. If you'd like to debate my morality then you may do so in my telegrams.

Rule One of Regional Government: You lose the ability to express an individual opinion without your region taking the heat for your statements for the entirety of your term. Especially when implying that doxxing is okay as long as it doesn’t happen onsite. You know, given what we learned about Farkasfalka and CCD’s private chat and what you people suggested.

According to NQ the mods are all corrupt as well, so I would take it with a grain of salt.

[Nouveau Quebecois]

This is a fact of foreign affairs universal in this game of politics and words. That you choose to disregard this will be to your detriment, not that Farkasfalka has a good name or reputation to begin with.

We'll take the personal freedoms route, just like we've taken the 'don't lynch people because of their politics' route, however unpopular that may be.

[Nouveau Quebecois]

Rule One of Regional Government: You lose the ability to express an individual opinion without your region taking the heat for your statements for the entirety of your term. Especially when implying that doxxing is okay as long as it doesn’t happen onsite. You know, given what we learned about Farkasfalka and CCD’s private chat and what you people suggested.

According to NQ the mods are all corrupt as well, [...]

[Yokiria]

we've taken the 'don't lynch people because of their politics' route, however unpopular that may be.

Don't what people?

[Nouveau Quebecois]

we've taken the 'don't lynch people because of their politics' route, however unpopular that may be.

Don't what people?

'Don't lynch people'.

[Drop Your Pants]

We'll take the personal freedoms route, just like we've taken the 'don't lynch people because of their politics' route, however unpopular that may be.

Coming from a region with a butchered swastika flag, freedom is humorous to hear.

[Yokiria]

Don't what people?

'Don't lynch people'.

And you qualified that position by saying "however unpopular that may be"?

I understand it may be the unpopular stance in Farkasfalka, for obvious reasons, but 'Don't lynch people' is quite the popular stance in general.

[Nouveau Quebecois]

'Don't lynch people'.

And you qualified that position by saying "however unpopular that may be"?

I understand it may be the unpopular stance in Farkasfalka, for obvious reasons, but 'Don't lynch people' is quite the popular stance in general.

So what are you not understanding about 'we don't like to lynch people for their politics'?

[Vungar]

That's a statement I made on my own behalf. If you'd like to debate my morality then you may do so in my telegrams.

Rule One of Regional Government: You lose the ability to express an individual opinion without your region taking the heat for your statements for the entirety of your term. Especially when implying that doxxing is okay as long as it doesn’t happen onsite. You know, given what we learned about Farkasfalka and CCD’s private chat and what you people suggested.

A nation’s values and what they bring to the table (in other words how productive they will be for the region) is what earns them a spot in Farkasfalka’s government. Political opinions and world views are a secondary factor and only relevant naturally with public opinion which is in turn only majorly relevant during election cycles. This is even less important when understanding that 2/3 of the government is appointed by myself.

We'll take the personal freedoms route, just like we've taken the 'don't lynch people because of their politics' route, however unpopular that may be.

Coming from a region with a butchered swastika flag, freedom is humorous to hear.

Coming from a nation whose interpretation of our flag is highly incorrect, your opinion is humorous to hear.

[Honeydewistania]

Why are we arguing with fascists? Just ignore them until Vungar inevitably ceases to exist then we can start noticing this hellhole again

[Jar Wattinree]

Why are we arguing with fascists? Just ignore them until Vungar inevitably ceases to exist then we can start noticing this hellhole again

It adds to the property value of this post.

[Xoriet]

Why are we arguing with fascists? Just ignore them until Vungar inevitably ceases to exist then we can start noticing this hellhole again

Mostly because I'm curious when they decided it was cool for government members to implicitly condone doxxing as long as it happens offsite. And I hope I'm mistaken, but apparently that is now being described as a political opinion. I wasn't aware that community safety had anything to do with politics.

[Nouveau Quebecois]

Why are we arguing with fascists? Just ignore them until Vungar inevitably ceases to exist then we can start noticing this hellhole again

Mostly because I'm curious when they decided it was cool for government members to implicitly condone doxxing as long as it happens offsite. And I hope I'm mistaken, but apparently that is now being described as a political opinion. I wasn't aware that community safety had anything to do with politics.

What happens offsite has nothing to do with community safety.

[Great Algerstonia]

Mostly because I'm curious when they decided it was cool for government members to implicitly condone doxxing as long as it happens offsite. And I hope I'm mistaken, but apparently that is now being described as a political opinion. I wasn't aware that community safety had anything to do with politics.

What happens offsite has nothing to do with community safety.

I’m sorry, what?

[Jar Wattinree]

Mostly because I'm curious when they decided it was cool for government members to implicitly condone doxxing as long as it happens offsite. And I hope I'm mistaken, but apparently that is now being described as a political opinion. I wasn't aware that community safety had anything to do with politics.

What happens offsite has nothing to do with community safety.

So, you're saying the Farkasfalka on NS and the Farkasfalka on Discord are two distinct, separate entities that just happen to share members, names, policies, flags, laws, and they're not the same thing?

What an exceedingly poor government you have constructed. Fascism aside, that alone is enough to keep you in the blacklist forever.