It's just a small snip of the activity feed to prove a point. I didn't think I'd really have to explain it to you.
Advertisement
by Funkadelia » Fri Aug 04, 2017 11:40 pm
by Aclion » Sat Aug 05, 2017 12:58 am
by Cormactopia Prime » Sat Aug 05, 2017 5:21 am
by Funkadelia » Sat Aug 05, 2017 7:56 am
by Unibot III » Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:12 am
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Killer Kitty » Sat Aug 05, 2017 9:19 am
Unibot III wrote:Your endorsement margin is dropping - and now you're claiming foreign military opposition and copy and pasting out of context Activity feeds. <Wow, aren't we in trouble...?>
11 hours ago: Tarrinian relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: The Parisian Islands relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: The Cookie Man relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: Corsinthia relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: United Green States relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: THE 111 relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: Eleanoorr relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: Sakuya Izayoi relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: Soten relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: Tarrinian relocated from Wintreath to Versailles Isle.
11 hours ago: Tesla-land relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: Sangoliaso relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: QC1 relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: New Naoi relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: Kazineone I relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: Closedoff relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: Barrelene relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
11 hours ago: A Sparkly relocated from Versailles Isle to Lazarus.
by Roavin » Sat Aug 05, 2017 9:36 am
Killer Kitty wrote:And that The South Pacific is in direct violation of the Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation between The South Pacific and Lazarus, to boot.
by RiderSyl » Sat Aug 05, 2017 9:44 am
Killer Kitty wrote:<snip>
Killer Kitty wrote:If I had to guess, I'd say they're trying an attrition run, which might work if Lazarus was some UCR Podunk with 3 nations and not, you know, a GCR.
Killer Kitty wrote:And that The South Pacific is in direct violation of the Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation between The South Pacific and Lazarus, to boot.
by Killer Kitty » Sat Aug 05, 2017 9:50 am
Article I. Mutual Recognition of Government Legitimacy.
Section 1. The parties to this treaty recognize the government of each region, based upon its constitutions and laws, as legitimate, and will not extend that recognition to any government that comes to power through means not proscribed by law, which shall be determined by the legitimate government in question.
Article II. Affirmation of Non-Aggression.
Section 1. The parties to this treaty reaffirm their pact of non-aggression.
Section 2. Both parties will refrain from engaging in any decisive and purposeful action that will undermine the regional security of either party.
Section 3. Both parties agree to assist each other in responding to an internal coup d'etat, unless relieved of duty by mutual agreement.
Article IX. Suspension of Terms and Termination of the Treaty.
Section 1. Either party may suspend the terms of the treaty, if the other party has materially breached its terms, until such a time that both parties peacefully settle the dispute and adopt a memorandum of understanding that the treaty is again in force.
Section 2. Either party may terminate the treaty with five days notice, posted publicly in the forum of deposit in both regions, after which the terms of treaty are no longer binding on either party.
by Unibot III » Sat Aug 05, 2017 9:54 am
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Killer Kitty » Sat Aug 05, 2017 9:58 am
Unibot III wrote:You don't have the legitimate authority to revoke the treaty, Evil Wolf. That's kinda the point. You don't have the authority to do anything. You're not the legitimate government of Lazarus. The treaty compels its allies, the South Pacific, to take material action to assist the legitimate government in responding to the internal coup.
by RiderSyl » Sat Aug 05, 2017 9:58 am
Killer Kitty wrote:TSP can't claim to be "enforcing" the treaty if it's been revoked, now can they?
by The NAtion OF Froggy » Sat Aug 05, 2017 10:03 am
Ridersyl wrote:Killer Kitty wrote:TSP can't claim to be "enforcing" the treaty if it's been revoked, now can they?
They can. To TSP, you and yours are the coup side.
You're running up to a region that believes Funk, Lamb, you were the internal coup, that believes the Celestial Union is the legitimate government, and believes that Funk's new Monarchy is a sham, and shouting "Hey, you violated the treaty! It's over!"
What do you think you're accomplishing, EW? Because I can tell you what you actually are. Nothing.
by Killer Kitty » Sat Aug 05, 2017 10:04 am
Ridersyl wrote:Killer Kitty wrote:TSP can't claim to be "enforcing" the treaty if it's been revoked, now can they?
They can. To TSP, you and yours are the coup side.
You're running up to a region that believes Funk, Lamb, you were the internal coup, that believes the Celestial Union is the legitimate government, and believes that Funk's new Monarchy is a sham, and shouting "Hey, you violated the treaty! It's over!"
What do you think you're accomplishing, EW? Because I can tell you what you actually are. Nothing.
by RiderSyl » Sat Aug 05, 2017 10:08 am
Killer Kitty wrote:They don't get to just ignore the Treaty because it doesn't suit them. That's not how Treaties work.
Killer Kitty wrote:...I don't see the legal basis for that claim in the Treaty. Care to point out the clauses for me?
Section 3. Both parties agree to assist each other in responding to an internal coup d'etat, unless relieved of duty by mutual agreement.
by Ikania » Sat Aug 05, 2017 10:41 am
Killer Kitty wrote:Unibot III wrote:You don't have the legitimate authority to revoke the treaty, Evil Wolf. That's kinda the point. You don't have the authority to do anything. You're not the legitimate government of Lazarus. The treaty compels its allies, the South Pacific, to take material action to assist the legitimate government in responding to the internal coup.
So now TSP is denying that the elected government of Lazarus is legitimate and instead recognizes the authority of a non-elected government based in a region that isn't even Lazarus and says the treaty is really with them and not the Government of Lazarus?
...I don't see the legal basis for that claim in the Treaty. Care to point out the clauses for me?
by Glen-Rhodes » Sat Aug 05, 2017 1:03 pm
Killer Kitty wrote:Unibot III wrote:You don't have the legitimate authority to revoke the treaty, Evil Wolf. That's kinda the point. You don't have the authority to do anything. You're not the legitimate government of Lazarus. The treaty compels its allies, the South Pacific, to take material action to assist the legitimate government in responding to the internal coup.
So now TSP is denying that the elected government of Lazarus is legitimate and instead recognizes the authority of a non-elected government based in a region that isn't even Lazarus and says the treaty is really with them and not the Government of Lazarus?
...I don't see the legal basis for that claim in the Treaty. Care to point out the clauses for me?
by Killer Kitty » Sat Aug 05, 2017 2:20 pm
by Glen-Rhodes » Sat Aug 05, 2017 2:39 pm
Killer Kitty wrote:Calling the Government of Lazarus "LWU" doesn't suddenly valid your point, and I'm confused as to why you think this is a legitimate line of logic.
Unless you have evidence of your assertions, which you and I both know you don't, you have no legal grounds to stand on other than pure rhetoric.
by Altheriol » Sat Aug 05, 2017 3:12 pm
Solorni wrote:Given the logs, what people like GR say is irrelevant. I will wait to see what TGW has to say on behalf of TSP.
by Altmoras » Sat Aug 05, 2017 3:14 pm
by Cormactopia Prime » Sat Aug 05, 2017 4:14 pm
Ridersyl wrote:<snip>
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement