Araraukar wrote:OOC: A question: is "firm" used in a way that it equals "business"? Legalese in English is my weak point as a non-native user.
(OOC: Yes, ‘firm’ here is equivalent to ‘business’.)
Advertisement
by Kenmoria » Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:02 am
Araraukar wrote:OOC: A question: is "firm" used in a way that it equals "business"? Legalese in English is my weak point as a non-native user.
by Sierra Lyricalia » Mon Jun 29, 2020 5:31 pm
Araraukar wrote:OOC: A question: is "firm" used in a way that it equals "business"? Legalese in English is my weak point as a non-native user.
EDIT: And if yes, then why no waiver for agreements between nations?
by Araraukar » Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:35 pm
Sierra Lyricalia wrote:OOC: The defined terms make clear that this proposal applies to contracts in which at least one of the parties is a private actor (i.e. not part of a government). It's not explicit, of course, but I don't see how any of this could reasonably be held to apply to a treaty between countries.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement