Bananaistan wrote:That leads to the point about RP. Because there's no automatic compliance and there's no direct link between resolutions and issues, we don't really care what someone's policies are. But the GA community does care about prominent GAers saying they don't comply with resolutions. This is Godmoding. And is a legitimate criticism when so many arguments in this proposal rely on CD's contribution to the GA.
If there's no automatic compliance then why is compliance relevant at all? Because RP? Because he participates in the GA's activities? Is that all that matters then? Because In case you haven't noticed, there's a lot more to the resolution at vote than just his activities in the GA.
Also, godmodding!? Don'tcha think you're taking this RP aspect of it just a bit too far with that one? You make it sound like he's wrecking the GA for everyone, cheating the rest of it out of some sort of experience that now is worthless because one person said "No."