RiderSyl wrote:Thuzbekistan wrote:I dont mean to be a d*ck here, but none of this is relevant. You're calling someone out for spending a small amount of money on a game.
He sarcastically went "Lol how can you afford internet". Well, I gave him a detailed answer on why. And helpfully proving that this is about more than just these small little purchases, Jocospor went and spent over 170 dollars on this game a few days after that post. It wouldn't be so bad if he didn't ooze condescending entitlement, but he does. All the time.Thuzbekistan wrote:I'm sorry you've been through that and still siffer, but it's not relevant to the conversation and it was really unfair for you to go for this line of attack.
I've yet to see any of you explain how it's irrelevant, while I've been repeatedly explaining how it was on-topic over and over. As for it being unfair for me to bring it up? I don't care. Especially now with the implication I'm making it up. I'm even more inclined to be unfair towards Jocospor, Shrew, and the Confederation in the future.Thuzbekistan wrote:This whole thread, you've been overly hostile, condescending, and done nothing to maintain a civil argument. Cancer or no, disabled or no, theres no reason for this.
Apparently my exchange with Peigan just didn't fucking happen, huh? Go back and check it out. I am civil within reason. When it's these CCD peeps though, I will not hold back, because they deserve it.
1) it was not relevant due to the fact that he was responding to you calling him out on it. He simply stated that 1.35 is a small amount of money. That's like, 1000 stamps. I've seen more people spend money on GA resolutions.
2) it is extremely unfair and that you dont care is eh. Having to have supported and helped with cancer survivors who are still disabled to this day in my own family, I hate that you are using it as a way to try and take a debate opponent off guard and make him seem like a grade A arse. He may be that, but using cancer and disabilities to do so is just frustrating.
3. Your condescension is the only one I have experience with in this thread because the moment I popped on here, you were condescending, hostile, and dismissive to my reasoning for being against offensive liberations.
Again, I am truthfully sorry for what you suffer, but using it the way you have is what's over the line, not jobors confusion at being angry over 1.35. His response to you was well manored but firm and you treated him like he slapped you in the face.