Araraukar wrote:This would also ensure that securities are traded fairly.
Exactly how do you get that out of what the resolution says?
I would imagine they mean currencies and not securities. If so they would be correct.
Advertisement
by United Federated States of Omega » Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:00 am
Araraukar wrote:This would also ensure that securities are traded fairly.
Exactly how do you get that out of what the resolution says?
by Bears Armed » Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:21 am
by Secundus Imperium Romanum » Sun Apr 30, 2017 8:36 am
by United Federated States of Omega » Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:32 pm
Bears Armed wrote:OOC
"WA legislation" is a better term to use than "international law"... After all, a [non-WA] treaty between any number of nations -- even just two nations -- that have agreed mutually to count it among their laws would also count as "international law".
by Araraukar » Mon May 01, 2017 5:31 pm
United Federated States of Omega wrote:OOC: Fixed! Thanks for the pointer.
So anything else before I submit?
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by United Federated States of Omega » Mon May 01, 2017 8:03 pm
by Imperium Anglorum » Mon May 01, 2017 9:06 pm
United Federated States of Omega wrote:Campaign?
by United Federated States of Omega » Thu May 04, 2017 6:53 pm
by Willania Imperium » Thu May 04, 2017 9:42 pm
by Yohannes » Fri May 05, 2017 12:31 am
by United Federated States of Omega » Fri May 05, 2017 1:21 pm
Yohannes wrote:
'Establishes the International Securities and Exchange Commission (ISEC) to develop, maintain, and publish a model code of securities regulations, which may act as a guide for member state governments;'
'Empowers the ISEC to regulate the exchanges on which currencies are traded to prevent artificial manipulation of the exchange rate and to ensure that these exchanges operate without bias toward the citizens of any one nation.'
To be more specific, Your Excellency, I would like to ask: what would this possible 'model code of securities regulations' be like? And would it simply act as a guide, and just that, a guide, and nothing more than that? Or would it perhaps one day be enforced as not just a guide, but rules, upon member states of the World Assembly?
What would be considered as acceptable or unacceptable by the above commission? It would thoroughly terrify the many Yohannesian investors out there to know that their chosen financial instruments would one day be considered as illegitimate or corrupt by the laws of the World Assembly.
Furthermore, given that under the submitted proposal, the ISEC would be empowered to regulate currency exchanges, what would happen to nations which are currently already involved heavily in the furthering of international commerce and trade, such as Yohannes, which through no fault of its own, has an artificially inflated or deflated currency due to the extent to which its currency has been spread to, or be used as instruments of trade, in multiple nations around the regions of the international communities? Would there be a set of time where such nation as Yohannes would be given the time limit to adjust to this new possible resolution?
Thank you for your time.
by Yohannes » Fri May 05, 2017 11:49 pm
by United Federated States of Omega » Sat May 06, 2017 1:59 pm
by Wallenburg » Tue May 09, 2017 12:12 am
United Federated States of Omega wrote:Establishes the International Securities and Exchange Commission (ISEC) to develop, maintain, and publish a model code of securities regulations, which may act as a guide for member state governments;
Empowers the ISEC to regulate the exchanges on which currencies are traded to prevent artificial manipulation of the exchange rate and to ensure that these exchanges operate without bias toward the citizens of any one nation.
by Sierra Lyricalia » Tue May 09, 2017 5:59 am
Wallenburg wrote:"Most of this proposal does not do anything, but these clauses concern me:"United Federated States of Omega wrote:Establishes the International Securities and Exchange Commission (ISEC) to develop, maintain, and publish a model code of securities regulations, which may act as a guide for member state governments;
Empowers the ISEC to regulate the exchanges on which currencies are traded to prevent artificial manipulation of the exchange rate and to ensure that these exchanges operate without bias toward the citizens of any one nation.
"By my interpretation, this creates a committee that can create whatever laws it sees fit, without oversight from member states or the World Assembly in general. The committee also receives powers to enforce its laws on member states, a power that not even the World Assembly has. Does this not amount to granting the International Securities and Exchange Commission police powers and, if not, how else does the committee regulate exchanges?"
by Wallenburg » Tue May 09, 2017 9:18 am
Sierra Lyricalia wrote:"Ambassador [OOC: is this still Ogenbond, or has Helen come in to discuss this one?], I don't see any police powers here. Regulatory authority over markets doesn't equate to having swat teams at your fingertips. Sometimes it should, but honestly I don't see where auditing records, requiring process certifications, making trade rules, and assessing fines automatically bestows the kind of unrestricted puissance implied by the term 'police powers.'
Nothing I see here seems to permit authority over anything outside the scope of currency exchanges, and even in that scope, only to ensure fair dealings. I'm not sure I see the problem, honestly."
by Covenstone » Tue May 09, 2017 9:32 am
Wallenburg wrote:Sierra Lyricalia wrote:"Ambassador [OOC: is this still Ogenbond, or has Helen come in to discuss this one?], I don't see any police powers here. Regulatory authority over markets doesn't equate to having swat teams at your fingertips. Sometimes it should, but honestly I don't see where auditing records, requiring process certifications, making trade rules, and assessing fines automatically bestows the kind of unrestricted puissance implied by the term 'police powers.'
"Ah, I see. So this committee's regulations are ones that member states do not necessarily have to comply with, even if only out of fear that the committee would exercise police powers to enforce its independently created laws. I must tell you, Ambassador, I am genuinely relieved."Nothing I see here seems to permit authority over anything outside the scope of currency exchanges, and even in that scope, only to ensure fair dealings. I'm not sure I see the problem, honestly."
"The problem, Ambassador Zakalwe, is that this committee has the power 'to develop, maintain, and publish a model code of securities regulations'. Member states have no influence over what regulations this committee introduces. The resolution grants it free reign to design whatever laws it sees fit."
OOC: This is still Ogenbond, for the moment.
by Nativista » Tue May 09, 2017 1:09 pm
Covenstone wrote:Wallenburg wrote:"Ah, I see. So this committee's regulations are ones that member states do not necessarily have to comply with, even if only out of fear that the committee would exercise police powers to enforce its independently created laws. I must tell you, Ambassador, I am genuinely relieved."
"The problem, Ambassador Zakalwe, is that this committee has the power 'to develop, maintain, and publish a model code of securities regulations'. Member states have no influence over what regulations this committee introduces. The resolution grants it free reign to design whatever laws it sees fit."
OOC: This is still Ogenbond, for the moment.
The exact clause says "Establishes the International Securities and Exchange Commission (ISEC) to develop, maintain, and publish a model code of securities regulations, which may act as a guide for member state governments;"
So yes, they have the power to develop the laws, but the second part says "may act as a guide for member state governments." Which, to me, implies that member state governments do not necessarily have to follow the regulations they create.
by Aclion » Tue May 09, 2017 1:27 pm
Nativista wrote:Zachary Briars, Nativista's Director of Economic Affairs, taps his fingers on the table. "I reckon dat's how YOU see it, but dis would also give the WA the power to stretch the meaning of the term, "guide for member state governments". They could go along makin' new laws all willy-nilly, sayin' that it's all for the good of the WA member nations."
by Covenstone » Tue May 09, 2017 1:34 pm
Aclion wrote:Nativista wrote:Zachary Briars, Nativista's Director of Economic Affairs, taps his fingers on the table. "I reckon dat's how YOU see it, but dis would also give the WA the power to stretch the meaning of the term, "guide for member state governments". They could go along makin' new laws all willy-nilly, sayin' that it's all for the good of the WA member nations."
"And we will be obligated to treat those new laws as a guide, and if the WA tried to treat them as a mandate(they can't by the way, they're perfect) we can tell them to pound sand."
by Yohannes » Tue May 09, 2017 3:33 pm
by United Federated States of Omega » Tue May 09, 2017 3:40 pm
Yohannes wrote:That was the reason, Your Excellencies, that I have personally asked the Excellency Mr Alexander Xavier of the Omegan government, regarding the commission and authority, to which the most excellent representative Xavier replied with the most illustrious of assurance that there shall be no enforcement of will upon the good investors of the international community. I am of the opinion that, if the Omegan government would keep the promise of non-enforcement, that the realisation of this resolution might actually do good; only, and only of course, if the Omegan government would keep its promise of not interfering on day to day investing activities.
by Yohannes » Tue May 09, 2017 3:48 pm
by Maddering Ink Islands » Tue May 09, 2017 4:25 pm
Wallenburg wrote:"The problem, Ambassador Zakalwe, is that this committee has the power 'to develop, maintain, and publish a model code of securities regulations'. Member states have no influence over what regulations this committee introduces. The resolution grants it free reign to design whatever laws it sees fit."
OOC: This is still Ogenbond, for the moment.
by Neo Byzantium » Tue May 09, 2017 4:50 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement