NATION

PASSWORD

[Draft 1] - Animal Husbandry Feed Chain

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Simone Republic
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1867
Founded: Jul 09, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

[Draft 1] - Animal Husbandry Feed Chain

Postby Simone Republic » Fri Mar 15, 2024 8:00 am

Motivation

This is mostly contain stuff regarding governance of feed going into food, that did not make GA713, Reducing Food Contaminants and Residues.

It draws some inspiration from the FAO-WHO Code of Practice on Good Animal Feeding, although I use terms closer to existing WA terminology. The part on rendering is from the ban on Meat and Bone Meals (MBM) which is separate.

https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimen ... l-feed/en/

Draft 1

The World Assembly (WA),

Noting the frequent trading of food between WA states;

Affirming the passage of related GARs such as 333, 679 and 713;

Desiring clear standards on feed for animal husbandry (“feed”) to ensure the safety of sapient individuals (“individuals”) consuming products derived from animal husbandry as food;

The WA hereby enacts as follows:

  1. Definitions.
    1. "Animal husbandry" means the raising of non-sapient animals (“animals”) for the purpose of slaughtering for food for individuals.
    2. "Authority" means an entity designated by a WA state to formulate, enforce and interpret the rules and standards imposed by this resolution.
    3. "FDRA" means the WA Food and Drug Regulatory Agency.
    4. "Rules" means all standards and regulations to be promulgated under clauses (2) to (5).
  2. Veterinary drugs.
    1. Each authority is to determine rules for the use of veterinary drugs, particularly feed containing veterinary drugs, as well as standards for determining borderline cases between additives and veterinary drugs.
    2. Each authority is required to adopt the principle that the use of veterinary drugs shall be only on a strictly necessary basis, taking into account the conditions of animal husbandry in that state.
  3. Rendering.
    1. Rendering refers to the process of converting animal tissue into feed.
    2. Rendering is governed regardless of source, such as recycled animal tissue (such as from restaurants) and discarded materials from feed processing.
    3. The use of rendered products from one species for feed for the same species is prohibited.
    4. Any use of rendered products that, in the determination of the authority or FDRA, poses a significant threat to the health of any individuals that consume food produced from feed, shall also be prohibited.
  4. Feed chain.
    1. Feed chain refers to the entire process of feeding, from production, processing, storage, transport, distribution, to the actual feeding of the said animals.
    2. Each authority is to ensure that all participants in the feed chain are responsible for their portion of the feed chain.
  5. Best practices. Each authority is to publish guidelines for best practices for the following, as determined by each authority based on the technology and other conditions of that WA state, subject to extant WA resolutions:
    1. Sanitary and maintenance conditions across all premises, equipment, and means of transport used throughout the feed chain;
    2. Segregation of any materials used in the feed chain from other materials not intended for use as feed to avoid cross-contamination;
    3. Training of any sapient individuals involved in the feed chain;
    4. On-farm manufacturing, production and use of feed, both for on-site use and for shipments to other farms;
    5. Documentation and audit trails for all stages of the feed chain;
    6. Any other matters regarding the feed chain at the discretion of the said authority or FDRA.
  6. Compliance.
    1. Rules and standards stated in this resolution shall be tailored by each authority for different species of animals in that state.
    2. Each authority is to publish standards in the sampling, testing, analysis, and inspections of feed (and facilities throughout the feed chain) to ensure compliance, and to conduct (or appoint any agents as it deems appropriate) to conduct such tasks.
    3. If a WA state (say “state A”) produces and distributes its own feed, or imports and distributes its feed from another state, state A’s authority is responsible for ensuring compliance with the rules of state A.
    4. Each authority is to review and update from time-to-time its rules based on the latest scientific research.
    5. All rules from an authority shall be publicly available free-of-charge through convenient means.
  7. FDRA role.
    1. FDRA is to formulate and update periodically model rules for each WA state under clauses (2) to (6) for consideration by each authority.
    2. If a WA state is conclusively able to demonstrate to FDRA that it cannot comply with this resolution due to a lack of resources or technological capability, it may voluntarily elect to outsource such work to FDRA. If FDRA is acting as the authority, FDRA's model rules shall apply to that state.


Char count: 4,348
Last edited by Simone Republic on Thu Mar 28, 2024 3:21 am, edited 7 times in total.
All posts OOC. (He/him). I don't speak for TNP. IC the "white bear" (it) is for jokes only.

User avatar
The Ice States
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 2900
Founded: Jun 23, 2022
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby The Ice States » Fri Mar 15, 2024 1:58 pm

Ooc: Would Section 5 contradict provisions such as GA #679, s 5b?
Last edited by The Ice States on Fri Mar 15, 2024 1:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Factbooks · 46x World Assembly Author · Festering Snakepit Wiki · WACampaign · GA Stat Effects Data

Posts in the WA forums are Ooc and unofficial, absent indication otherwise.
Please check out my roleplay thread The Battle of Glass Tears!
WA 101 Guides to GA authorship, campaigning, and more.

User avatar
Simone Republic
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1867
Founded: Jul 09, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Simone Republic » Fri Mar 15, 2024 7:07 pm

The Ice States wrote:Ooc: Would Section 5 contradict provisions such as GA #679, s 5b?


Clause 4(b) imposed a blanket "subject to extant resolutions" bit but I can move the wording down to make it clearer and shorten it.

If you're just talking about clause (5), there's lot of things it can potentially contradict, like sanitation and transportation laws, so it's just "an authority is required to recommend to everyone in the food chain best practices", which I assume any reasonable government regulating agriculture would do anyway, through a leaflet or a web site or whatever.
All posts OOC. (He/him). I don't speak for TNP. IC the "white bear" (it) is for jokes only.

User avatar
Simone Republic
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1867
Founded: Jul 09, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Bump

Postby Simone Republic » Thu Mar 28, 2024 3:21 am

Although this is still on Draft 1 at this stage.
All posts OOC. (He/him). I don't speak for TNP. IC the "white bear" (it) is for jokes only.


Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads