[PASSED] Repeal "Condemn the Pacific"

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Sat Jul 23, 2016 12:03 pm

Myrth wrote:How long before certain parties attempt to stack the voting against the repeal?

Well some of us are trying to stack "For" the repeal, but the biggest influence will be TNP and how their internal vote goes.

Edit: And Raven just voted "For' while I wrote this post.

New Horensian Kingdom wrote:I will never vote to give The Pacific even a nanometer. I will oppose The Pacific until the end. Therefore, I vote with a resounding NO.

Ah, that's nice. *pats head*

by **Canton Empire** » Sat Jul 23, 2016 12:40 pm

New Horensian Kingdom wrote:I will never vote to give The Pacific even a nanometer. I will oppose The Pacific until the end. Therefore, I vote with a resounding NO.

The resounding NO has not been the story of the thread

by **Trinnien** » Sat Jul 23, 2016 3:34 pm

Europeia also voted For the repeal early in the process, and with TNP, TWP, Osiris, and Balder all voting in favor, the stacking momentum is likely to see it go in The Pacific's favor. Nothing is impossible, and the tables could still turn but I think that is unlikely.

by **Canton Empire** » Sat Jul 23, 2016 3:42 pm

Trinnien wrote:Europeia also voted For the repeal early in the process, and with TNP, TWP, Osiris, and Balder all voting in favor, the stacking momentum is likely to see it go in The Pacific's favor. Nothing is impossible, and the tables could still turn but I think that is unlikely.

We are still waiting for Pacific's vote too, so that is 557 votes for the repeal

by **We Are Not the NSA** » Sat Jul 23, 2016 4:02 pm

I have voted For.

by **Pierconium** » Sat Jul 23, 2016 4:18 pm

Almonaster Nuevo wrote:Also, most RL democracies have preconditions for various offices, such as age, residency, place of birth, etc. You don't usually hear that being argued as "undemocratic".

Aside from the fact that RL doesn't exactly translate, to be Delegate of a feeder you have the same stipulations. You must be resident in the region, have WA membership, etc.

The argument you are making is more akin to being told that you must be a member of the Democratic Party in order to even run for office.

by **Johann12** » Sat Jul 23, 2016 6:28 pm

I voted for the repeal .

by **Tailanda** » Sun Jul 24, 2016 3:54 am

In the name of Tailanda People's government, We do vote For for this resolution.

by **Pierconium** » Sun Jul 24, 2016 8:17 am

Thank you to those regions voting in favor.

Not sure what I will do without this chip on my shoulder.

by **Wineclaw** » Sun Jul 24, 2016 8:41 am

As a former Lazerian nation, we, the Collective, overwhelming votes FOR this resolution.

by **Crazy girl** » Sun Jul 24, 2016 1:31 pm

I couldn't care less if the Pacific keeps or loses their condemnation, but...that typo really bugs me.

by **Normlpeople** » Sun Jul 24, 2016 3:44 pm

Not that it matters at this point, but Pierconium has convinced me things have actually changed within the Pacific. If thats the case, the condemnation served its purpose and isn't needed any longer. Vote FOR, even with typo.

by **Pierconium** » Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:58 am

Crazy girl wrote:I couldn't care less if the Pacific keeps or loses their condemnation, but...that typo really bugs me.

You know you care about me.

by **Imperial Republic of Shadow** » Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:30 am

I will state for this one what I have said for all of them. If pacific has really changes and improved, vote a commendation for serving as example to others. NEVER repeal.

Do not strike history from the books, leave the condemnation there and vote a commendation so that anyone looking at active record sees someone went wrong and we spoke out and they fixed their issues and we recognized their improvement.

by **Canton Empire** » Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:10 am

Imperial Republic of Shadow wrote:I will state for this one what I have said for all of them. If pacific has really changes and improved, vote a commendation for serving as example to others. NEVER repeal.

Do not strike history from the books, leave the condemnation there and vote a commendation so that anyone looking at active record sees someone went wrong and we spoke out and they fixed their issues and we recognized their improvement.

A Commendation and a Condemnation at the same time is like repealing the condemnation right now.

by **Crazy girl** » Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:17 pm

Pierconium wrote:
Crazy girl wrote:I couldn't care less if the Pacific keeps or loses their condemnation, but...that typo really bugs me.

You know you care about me.

Aww, of course I do, Ivan. I'll write you a really nice condemnation....after I've had enough coffee. :lol:

by **The newfound islands** » Tue Jul 26, 2016 1:09 pm

THE PACIFIC RULES BABY. :clap:

by **Micronesia and the Marshall Islands** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 5:25 am

I, On behalf of the United Kingdom of Micronesia and The Marshall Islands, We vote to Repeal "Condemn the Pacific"

member · by **Eluvatar** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 10:39 am

Repeal "Condemn the Pacific" was passed 13,195 votes to 2,344.

[PASSED] Repeal "Condemn the Pacific"

Who is online