NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics IV: Disraeli Gears

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

So who do we want leading the Labour Party?

Jeremy Corbyn
142
48%
Owen Smith
66
22%
Lord Helix
89
30%
 
Total votes : 297

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68119
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sat Jul 23, 2016 3:45 pm

greed and death wrote:
Elepis wrote:
You arse, you almost got me then :p

there might have been riots


You laugh, but apparently all people could care about right after the vote was how it was going to affect Game of Thrones.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Sat Jul 23, 2016 3:45 pm

greed and death wrote:
Geilinor wrote:My point being that Labour tends to identify itself as social democratic rather than socialist.

New or Old Labour ?

With Old Labour, the right tended to refer to themselves as social democrats and the left as socialists.

With New Labour, neither, apart from the occasional claim by politicians to be 'ethical socialists' in Fabian Society pamphlets (which no one other than cabinet Ministers cared about, so no need to worry about the right-wing media).
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sat Jul 23, 2016 3:47 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Neoliberalism happened.

My point being that Labour tends to identify itself as social democratic rather than socialist.

It's all under the same tent.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sat Jul 23, 2016 3:48 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Neoliberalism happened.

The electorate happened*.

I didn't say Blairism, what set you off?
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Sat Jul 23, 2016 3:51 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:The electorate happened*.

I didn't say Blairism, what set you off?

Well, we can go further and talk about how Thatcher used social policy to socially engineer an economic system that increased the rate of car and home ownership among the populace, thus bringing us a more economically liberal electorate. Social democracy therefore had to adapt, just as various ideologies had to adapt over the years. It didn't just disappear.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sat Jul 23, 2016 4:03 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:I didn't say Blairism, what set you off?

Well, we can go further and talk about how Thatcher used social policy to socially engineer an economic system that increased the rate of car and home ownership among the populace, thus bringing us a more economically liberal electorate. Social democracy therefore had to adapt, just as various ideologies had to adapt over the years. It didn't just disappear.

Cars, maybe, but homes? I don't think so, not significantly.
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov. ... using.html
It may have accelerated under her, and almost certainly did, but even when it peaked in 2001 it didn't even reach 70%

And look where it left us. It also fell between 2001 and 2011, across all of England and Wales, and in London it was 50/50.
Where the country was in 1971.

I don't know what "social renting" is, but that peaked under Thatcher, in 1981, at 31%

Yes, I am reading the key points and not reading the actual study, but it's midnight, what do you want from me.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Sat Jul 23, 2016 4:27 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Neoliberalism happened.

The electorate happened*.


"it isn't that I set out on economic policies; it's that I set out really to change the approach, and changing the economics is the means of changing that approach. If you change the approach you really are after the heart and soul of the nation. Economics are the method; the object is to change the heart and soul." -Guess Who
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Jul 23, 2016 4:28 pm

Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Sat Jul 23, 2016 4:30 pm

Souseiseki wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:The electorate happened*.


"it isn't that I set out on economic policies; it's that I set out really to change the approach, and changing the economics is the means of changing that approach. If you change the approach you really are after the heart and soul of the nation. Economics are the method; the object is to change the heart and soul." -Guess Who

Margaret Thatcher gives herself too much credit, along with her supporters. The country was going that way, a Labour government under Jim Callaghan would have been marching in the same direction, a SDP/Liberal government under Roy Jenkins would have gone in the same direction too. But as Thatcher had luck on her side, we ended up with the radical ideological zealot taking us in that direction.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sat Jul 23, 2016 4:33 pm

Geilinor wrote:A Corbyn aide has been accused of breaking into an MP's office.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/23/jeremy-corbyn-aide-accused-illegal-entry-mps-office

"Spokesmen for Corbyn and McDonnell claimed that the row was a “small matter” stemming from a miscommunication, and that access had been sought on the assumption that Malhotra had vacated the office on resigning her post."

It seems to be "breaking in" bearing on the sheer technicality of what consists proper entry to an office, and the team alleges that it occurred after she vacated her shadow cabinet post.

Hardly lockpicks by torchlight.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Jul 23, 2016 4:39 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Geilinor wrote:A Corbyn aide has been accused of breaking into an MP's office.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/23/jeremy-corbyn-aide-accused-illegal-entry-mps-office

"Spokesmen for Corbyn and McDonnell claimed that the row was a “small matter” stemming from a miscommunication, and that access had been sought on the assumption that Malhotra had vacated the office on resigning her post."

It seems to be "breaking in" bearing on the sheer technicality of what consists proper entry to an office, and the team alleges that it occurred after she vacated her shadow cabinet post.

Hardly lockpicks by torchlight.

According to them, but Malhotra has a different story.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sat Jul 23, 2016 4:49 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:"Spokesmen for Corbyn and McDonnell claimed that the row was a “small matter” stemming from a miscommunication, and that access had been sought on the assumption that Malhotra had vacated the office on resigning her post."

It seems to be "breaking in" bearing on the sheer technicality of what consists proper entry to an office, and the team alleges that it occurred after she vacated her shadow cabinet post.

Hardly lockpicks by torchlight.

According to them, but Malhotra has a different story.

I'm trying to draw a line under what's being insinuated.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Chestaan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6977
Founded: Sep 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chestaan » Sat Jul 23, 2016 4:58 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Neoliberalism happened.

My point being that Labour tends to identify itself as social democratic rather than socialist.


As far as I know, it was founded explicitly as a socialist party. On the other point, Imperializt Russia is correct in saying that the social democracy policies of Old Labour were largely buried with neo-liberalism. The same happened across a lot of Europe, where Labour/Socialist parties took a sharp shift to the right. But it does seem that recently the older, left policies of these parties are becoming more in demand, as evidenced by the rise of Syriza, Podemos, Sinn Fein and AAA/PBP as well as Corbyn in Britain. Whether such a trend will last is hard to tell, I'm hopeful but not overly optimistic.
Council Communist
TG me if you want to chat, especially about economics, you can never have enough discussions on economics.Especially game theory :)
Economic Left/Right: -9.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.62

Getting the Guillotine

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:07 pm

Confirmed, Corbyn is running a den of thieves.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163962
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:13 pm

Hydesland wrote:Confirmed, Corbyn is running a den of thieves.

*guild
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:14 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Neoliberalism happened.

My point being that Labour tends to identify itself as social democratic rather than socialist.

The Labour Party's constitution explicitly states "the Labour Party is a democratic socialist party" (Clause IV), although the constitution goes on to say "to these ends we work for: A. A DYNAMIC ECONOMY, [...] with a thriving private sector [...]" as part of that same clause. So the Labour Party does self-describe as socialist, but is not sincerely socialist.
Last edited by Conscentia on Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:18 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:26 pm

Vassenor wrote:
greed and death wrote:there might have been riots


You laugh, but apparently all people could care about right after the vote was how it was going to affect Game of Thrones.

A new twist jump to reality.

Queen Elizabeth declares herself queen of the salt throne. Merkhal of house Lannister sends her best fighter to burn the English hither lands to provoke war.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:28 pm

Conscentia wrote:
Geilinor wrote:My point being that Labour tends to identify itself as social democratic rather than socialist.

The Labour Party's constitution explicitly states "the Labour Party is a democratic socialist party" (Clause IV), although the constitution goes on to say "to these ends we work for: A. A DYNAMIC ECONOMY, [...] with a thriving private sector [...]" as part of that same clause. So the Labour Party does self-describe as socialist, but is not sincerely socialist.

originally it said.
To secure for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry and the most equitable distribution thereof that may be possible upon the basis of the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange, and the best obtainable system of popular administration and control of each industry or service.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163962
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:41 pm

greed and death wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
You laugh, but apparently all people could care about right after the vote was how it was going to affect Game of Thrones.

A new twist jump to reality.

Queen Elizabeth declares herself queen of the salt throne. Merkhal of house Lannister sends her best fighter to burn the English hither lands to provoke war.

Elizabeth of House Windsor, the second of her name, by the grace of the old gods and the new of the Andals, the Rhoynar and the First Men Queen, Lord of the United Kingdom, Defender of the Faith, and Protector of the Realm.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:31 pm

thatcher did nothing to increase the amount of cars in ownership, the growth trend has been steady since the early 60s.

the steepest fall in the number of households with no cars was, wow, what a surprise, the 1950s and 1960s

the one notable thing in car ownership that increased in thatchers time was the number of households which had three cars. a tiny increase. and people who'd have voted tory anyway

http://www.racfoundation.org/assets/rac ... report.pdf
Last edited by Questers on Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:37 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Ithqington
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1203
Founded: Jun 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Ithqington » Sun Jul 24, 2016 3:17 am

Vassenor wrote:
Ithqington wrote:I know I am UKIP Supporter, but I think Jeremy Corbyn still better off be leader of labour party than anything else :eyebrow:


So how do you feel about the fact you seem to support people like this?

Sorry but Are you kidding me?

User avatar
Frank Zipper
Senator
 
Posts: 4207
Founded: Nov 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frank Zipper » Sun Jul 24, 2016 3:25 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:I don't know what "social renting" is, but that peaked under Thatcher, in 1981, at 31%


Renting a house or flat from the local council/authority or another social landlord like a housing association. In contrast to renting housing from a private sector landlord.
Put this in your signature if you are easily led.

User avatar
Frank Zipper
Senator
 
Posts: 4207
Founded: Nov 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frank Zipper » Sun Jul 24, 2016 3:26 am

Where are the English hither lands? I'm guessing Yorkshire.
Put this in your signature if you are easily led.

User avatar
Irona
Minister
 
Posts: 2399
Founded: Dec 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Irona » Sun Jul 24, 2016 3:56 am

Geilinor wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:"Spokesmen for Corbyn and McDonnell claimed that the row was a “small matter” stemming from a miscommunication, and that access had been sought on the assumption that Malhotra had vacated the office on resigning her post."

It seems to be "breaking in" bearing on the sheer technicality of what consists proper entry to an office, and the team alleges that it occurred after she vacated her shadow cabinet post.

Hardly lockpicks by torchlight.

According to them, but Malhotra has a different story.

Honestly it just looks like their grasping at straws now. When a new group of anti-Corbyn MP's are accusing him or his staff of doing something horrible every couple of days anything that might have had value just looks staged. All this does is harm Malhotra's credibility.

User avatar
Lamadia III
Diplomat
 
Posts: 877
Founded: Jun 05, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamadia III » Sun Jul 24, 2016 4:03 am

I just don't understand the entire thing with the Labour Party!
We are a modern, leading country in the world; we enjoy massive liberal freedoms, some of the best human rights in the world; we have business big & small everywhere and encourage innovative commerce whilst also sharing in some social projects, like the NHS & state schooling. I simply don't understand the appeal of the far-left, certainly not nationally, and not in the Labour Party. Labour should be a centre-political group, as Blair & co made it, with substantial differences to the Tories but nothing dangerously radical. The appeal of radical left-wing militancy is a real danger across Europe & even in the United States, but I would have hoped that here in Britain we would have gone past having a left-wing union-nut [see what I did there?] like Jeremy Corbyn or the Shadow Chancellor as the leader of the main opposition party!
PRO: Social conservatism | economic libertarianism |individual freedom | free market capitalism | UK Conservative Party | moderate Republicanism (US) | Parliamentary democracy | Thatcherism | Reganism | NHS | deregulation | low taxes | 9% corporate tax | interventionism | Israel |




ANTI: Socialism | Communism | Fascism | Tyranny | UK Labour Party | market controls | high taxation | envy politics | Trade unions | Jeremy Corbyn | a purely welfare state | inflation | extremism|


DANGEROUS SOCIALISM- Envy politics | Prevelant among liberal, labour & feminist movements; ie. prejudice against the wealthy

CONSERVATIVE.PARTYUK
Economic Left/Right:1|88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0|87
My UK Cabinet

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Camtropia, Elejamie, Hurdergaryp, Kostane, Lagene, Neanderthaland, New Temecula, Plan Neonie, Shearoa, Sovetskikh Sotsialicheskikh Respublik, Sylh Alanor, The Huskar Social Union, Three Galaxies, Whizaka Qampte

Advertisement

Remove ads