the black market opens

[Sharada]

you walk into a empty office and 5 men drssed in uniforms with masks greet you:interested in weapons?

ak-47 250us dollar 7 clips 2 hand granades extra
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RG-42

rpg-7 350 us dollar one launcher 4 rockets and backpack

sa-7 600 us dollar a piece

the pk machine gun with 6 boxes 5000 us dollar (ap rounds)

and if you have any special requests don't hesitate to ask....

[Cbngggfv]

your topic needs help

[Des-Bal]

Guns? Not much of a black market when all available merchandise is available legally in the same general area. If your goal is to deal in illegal goods may I suggest things that are illegal? Of course Des-Bal would never condone the export of slaves, drugs, nuclear materials, biological weapons, or any other lucrative illicit trade. If it comes to the federations attention that you are offering such services we will wag our proverbial finger and contact you immediatley with a list of what shall henceforth be referred to as a List of Grievances.

[Satirius]

Considering every NSer RPing as Chaotic Evil has them, you've tried to make a market from thin air, brother.

[Sharada]

Considering every NSer RPing as Chaotic Evil has them, you've tried to make a market from thin air, brother.

my weapons are cheaper and whe dont ask diffucult questions towards regimes but you are right our deals will be exspanded.

[Sharada]

t-55 main battle tank 50.000 us dollar (400 in suply)

with armour upgrade 60.000 us dollar (200 in suply)

and chem warheads for 100.000 us dollar(1000 in suply)

[Nazi Centauri]

ACHTUNG! DIE RUSSEN WEAPONS! We dont buy russian weapons as it is cheap stuff.

[Sharada]

ACHTUNG! DIE RUSSEN WEAPONS! We dont buy russian weapons as it is cheap stuff.

then why are all neo nazis armed with ak-47,s?

[Nazi Centauri]

ACHTUNG! DIE RUSSEN WEAPONS! We dont buy russian weapons as it is cheap stuff.

then why are all neo nazis armed with ak-47,s?

I'm not.I arm myself with a HK G-36 or MG42, or a MP40 which the Mafia should have use because it looks cool

[Sharada]

ACHTUNG! DIE RUSSEN WEAPONS! We dont buy russian weapons as it is cheap stuff.

then why are all neo nazis armed with ak-47,s?

I'm not.I arm myself with a HK G-36 or MG42, or a MP40 which the Mafia should have use because it looks cool

arent neo nazis iligal?

[Nazi Centauri]

ACHTUNG! DIE RUSSEN WEAPONS! We dont buy russian weapons as it is cheap stuff.

then why are all neo nazis armed with ak-47,s?

I'm not.I arm myself with a HK G-36 or MG42, or a MP40 which the Mafia should have use because it looks cool

arent neo nazis iligal?

In Germany,Austria and some european countries.

[Sharada]

you american then? bytheway this is what i think about nazis!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRQ5kL2B ... re=related

[Nazi Centauri]

you american then?

Australier not Amerikaner

[Sharada]

nazis loose all wars.

[Satirius]

nazis loose all wars.

So do ill-equipped insurgents with improper training and substandard weaponry. The Afghans would have lost before we gave them Stingers. No matter how well they used their Enfields, it would not cut it against a mechanized enemy.

[Sharada]

how abou the madhi militia than they destroyed the brittish in basra!

[Vetok]

how about the Madhi Militia then? They destroyed the British in Basra!

You mean the ones that walked out after doing a deal and the Iraqi's said they would take over? Yeah, destroyed my arse.

[Sharada]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_U ... s_in_Basra
this! the millitia was armed with the weapons in my shops......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6YMAyKrYqQ
so........

[Vetok]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_U.K._bases_in_Basra
this! the millitia was armed with the weapons in my shops......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6YMAyKrYqQ
so........

Ok, 25 Brits dead versus 100 Mahdi dead. Yes, the British were absolutely slaughtered.

And what difference do these links make? You're selling stuff that other nations either produce for themselves or already sell. At least try to find something new.

[Sharada]

they RETREATED! that counts as a loss and the brits had tanks planes and helicopter gunships and they stil could not win its not about numers but about determination.
like the battle of stalingrad kursk or vietnam or when sherman tanks fought tiger tanks.

[East Fancainia]

ACHTUNG! DIE RUSSEN WEAPONS! We dont buy russian weapons as it is cheap stuff.

then why are all neo nazis armed with ak-47,s?

I'm not.I arm myself with a HK G-36 or MG42, or a MP40 which the Mafia should have use because it looks cool

Wohoo! Hitler's Buzzsaw!

[Meso Smatonia]

TRANSMITTER: The Federal Republic of Meso Smatonia; Weaponry Development Division (AA1-124)
RECEIVER: The Oppressed Peoples of Sharada; Unknown (SOL15-A)

---

Primitive weaponry, even for your time period. Ineffective, inaccurate, cheap. Your people must invest in new technologies to advance towards the greater good: a true, advanced civilization.

[Vetok]

They RETREATED! That counts as a loss and the Brits had tanks, planes and helicopter gunships and they still could not win. Its not about numbers but about determination, like the battle of Stalingrad, Kursk or Vietnam or when Sherman tanks fought Tiger tanks.

If that's how you define a loss then you need to examine military history. Von Moltke, upon being acclaimed as being a being a great captain in the lines of Napoleon, Frederick and Turenne, in the middle of the Franco-Prussian War stated, 'No, for I have never conducted a retreat.' A successful retreat under attack is one of the hardest battlefield manoeuvres to do.

Stalingrad happened because the Germans failed to retreat in time, and Hitler let himself become distracted by the symbolism of it. He didn't agree with the plan for Kursk, but he helped delay it, which meant that the Russians had far too long to build up their positions. Vietnam was due to public pressure and a innovative strategy of attrition by the North Vietnamese.

As for your last example, that was a desperate situation. The Sherman tank was a cavalry tank, designed to exploit breakthroughs in the enemy lines, while M10 Wolverines dealt with the Axis armour. It was never a voluntary choice of the Allies to engage one of the best tanks in the world then, with what was essentially a second-rater.

[Satirius]

they RETREATED! that counts as a loss and the brits had tanks planes and helicopter gunships and they stil could not win its not about numers but about determination.
like the battle of stalingrad kursk or vietnam or when sherman tanks fought tiger tanks.

Yes, and the Shermans outnumbered the Tigers, and their guns were capable of killing them! Stalingrad was a battle between comparably-equipped armies, and in this case the untrained army (German Army, unprepared for the Russian winter), got its ass whipped. In Vietnam, only 58,000 American troops died, and I say only because 2 million Vietnamese died, most of them NVA/Viet Cong. Every time the North Vietnamese tried acting like a conventional force, they got beat down. In Kursk, the T-34 had both the logistics (easy to maintain, short supply line), the engineering (sloped armor, bitches), and the numerical drop on the Germans. Every example actually hinders your argument.

[Nazi Centauri]

ACHTUNG! DIE RUSSEN WEAPONS! We dont buy russian weapons as it is cheap stuff.

then why are all neo nazis armed with ak-47,s?

I'm not.I arm myself with a HK G-36 or MG42, or a MP40 which the Mafia should have use because it looks cool

Wohoo! Hitler's Buzzsaw!

The Buzzsaw