NATION

PASSWORD

Left-Wing Discussion Thread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What kind of Leftist are you?

Centrist/Moderate/Third wayer (Centrists usually reside within Leftist parties, so I thought I'd include them).
279
13%
Social Liberal
259
12%
Social Democrat
338
16%
Green Progressive
188
9%
Democratic Socialist
433
20%
Marxist Communist
246
12%
Anarchist Communist
202
10%
Other (please state)
176
8%
 
Total votes : 2121

User avatar
Gatito
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 357
Founded: Jun 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Gatito » Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:20 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Gatito wrote:Hey, as long as you're anti-state and anti-capitalism, you're fine in my books.

No fucking comrade of mine.

Primivism is not only fucking terrible, it's ableist - to a murderous degree - and even sexist. It very well might be the single most extreme form of reactionary ideology.

When did I ever say that I was a primitivist, comrade?
Lazarus (Link) citizen
International Northwestern Union (Link) citizen (as Otitag), former 2 time delegate
Central Pacific Empire (Link) citizen (as Octuagesimo Octavo), former assemblyman prior to merger

Egoist, post-left, anarcho-naturist, luddite, apolitical lifestylist
I'm a girl, dammit

User avatar
Mistillania
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 18
Founded: Dec 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mistillania » Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:28 pm

Kubra wrote:
Yorkers wrote:
Convince me, as an investor, to put my money into a collective.
it makes money

:ugeek: You can not give money to a collective, because a true collective has no need or use for it.

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17210
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:30 pm

Mistillania wrote:
Kubra wrote: it makes money

:ugeek: You can not give money to a collective, because a true collective has no need or use for it.
if someone's investing in something, it's sort of assumed that currency is changing hands.
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Mistillania
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 18
Founded: Dec 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mistillania » Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:41 pm

Kubra wrote:
Mistillania wrote: :ugeek: You can not give money to a collective, because a true collective has no need or use for it.
if someone's investing in something, it's sort of assumed that currency is changing hands.

The theoretical collective i am proposing is a closed economic system, making a capitalistic investment in such a system would be pointless. It would the equivalent of giving a computer to a recently contacted tribe in the Amazon. They may find some strange use for it, but not in some way the barer of the gift would have expected.
Last edited by Mistillania on Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Korouse
Minister
 
Posts: 3441
Founded: Mar 10, 2014
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Korouse » Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:59 pm

Yorkers wrote:
Conscentia wrote:they're more resilient than private businesses


Convince me, as an investor, to put my money into a collective.

That heavily depends on the success of the collective and your overall stance towards it as an individual. If it's doing particularly well and making money, doing something good and gaining popularity thus putting the idea out there that this sort of thing was a sustainable business model - why wouldn't you invest in it?

Assuming this is a worker's coop or something. Not a village.
"Everything is illusory except power,' the revolutionary people reply." - Vladimir Lenin

User avatar
Yorkers
Minister
 
Posts: 2488
Founded: Oct 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Yorkers » Tue Jul 26, 2016 9:02 pm

Hello all. I'm going a comparison of NSG's right and left wings. If you could all take the survey I made in this thread, I would really appreciate it:

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=385013
"Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people, a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs."
-John Jay, 1787

Dancing in the moonlight.
I wish that every kiss was never-ending.


An alternate history epic.

sa-wish!

Yorkers is a wealthy WASP playground inspired by L.L. Bean and Vineyard Vines catalogs and 19th Century Anglo-American nativism.

User avatar
United Marxist Nations
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33804
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United Marxist Nations » Tue Jul 26, 2016 9:17 pm

Posting this quote I did from the survey thread onto both Left and Right Wing DT's to see if anyone can tell me what ideology I most fit into, and whether I am left or right wing.

United Marxist Nations wrote:Which one should I take? I am a an authoritarian socialist who thinks government should be a mix of Church and a workers' party, with the Church deciding moral stances of the state. I also generally think that nations should be generally free to manage their matters separately, but I consider capitalists and bourgeois to be a force in society that actively works against morality and social decency.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.

Eastern Orthodox Catechumen. Religious communitarian with Sorelian, Marxist, and Traditionalist influences. Sympathies toward Sunni Islam. All flags/avatars are chosen for aesthetic or humor purposes only
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

User avatar
Crockerland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5456
Founded: Oct 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Crockerland » Tue Jul 26, 2016 9:20 pm

United Marxist Nations wrote:Posting this quote I did from the survey thread onto both Left and Right Wing DT's to see if anyone can tell me what ideology I most fit into, and whether I am left or right wing.

United Marxist Nations wrote:Which one should I take? I am a an authoritarian socialist who thinks government should be a mix of Church and a workers' party, with the Church deciding moral stances of the state. I also generally think that nations should be generally free to manage their matters separately, but I consider capitalists and bourgeois to be a force in society that actively works against morality and social decency.

go to http://politicaltest.net/en and take the test.
Free Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Tibet.
Gay not Queer / Why Abortion is Genocide / End Gay Erasure
PROUD SUPPORTER OF:
National Liberalism, Nuclear & Geothermal Power, GMOs, Vaccines, Biodiesel, LGBTIA equality, Universal Healthcare, Universal Basic Income, Constitutional Carry, Emotional Support Twinks, Right to Life


User avatar
United Marxist Nations
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33804
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United Marxist Nations » Tue Jul 26, 2016 9:34 pm

Crockerland wrote:
United Marxist Nations wrote:Posting this quote I did from the survey thread onto both Left and Right Wing DT's to see if anyone can tell me what ideology I most fit into, and whether I am left or right wing.


go to http://politicaltest.net/en and take the test.

Image
It really didn't tell me anything I didn't already know.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.

Eastern Orthodox Catechumen. Religious communitarian with Sorelian, Marxist, and Traditionalist influences. Sympathies toward Sunni Islam. All flags/avatars are chosen for aesthetic or humor purposes only
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

User avatar
The New Sea Territory
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16992
Founded: Dec 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Sea Territory » Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:03 pm

Yorkers wrote:
Conscentia wrote:they're more resilient than private businesses


Convince me, as an investor, to put my money into a collective.


Fuck investment, our collective will loot what it needs from the looters of the world: the bourgeoisie!
| Ⓐ | Anarchist Communist | Heideggerian Marxist | Vegetarian | Bisexual | Stirnerite | Slavic/Germanic Pagan | ᛟ |
Solntsa Roshcha --- Postmodern Poyltheist
"Christianity had brutally planted the poisoned blade in the healthy, quivering flesh of all humanity; it had goaded a cold wave
of darkness with mystically brutal fury to dim the serene and festive exultation of the dionysian spirit of our pagan ancestors."
-Renzo Novatore, Verso il Nulla Creatore

User avatar
Shonto
Secretary
 
Posts: 27
Founded: Jun 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Shonto » Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:51 pm

The New Sea Territory wrote:
Yorkers wrote:
Convince me, as an investor, to put my money into a collective.


Fuck investment, our collective will loot what it needs from the looters of the world: the bourgeoisie!

No war but the class war my dude :D

User avatar
Yugo-Austria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 565
Founded: Jun 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yugo-Austria » Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:00 pm

Gatito wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:No fucking comrade of mine.

Primivism is not only fucking terrible, it's ableist - to a murderous degree - and even sexist. It very well might be the single most extreme form of reactionary ideology.

When did I ever say that I was a primitivist, comrade?

The difference between primitivism and anarchism is that primitivism is because they're too stupid, while anarchism is a choice- so, he's not primitivist, he's anarchist.
Edit:
P.S.: Primitivism is probably the least sexist form of (non?)government there is, because back in yonder days when everyone was too stupid to form a good government, men and women did the same things - hunting, picking berries, etc. (Referring to pre-humans, of course.)
Last edited by Yugo-Austria on Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
pleaes God don't judge me for my previous posts i know it was cringe

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:06 pm

Conscentia wrote:
The Grene Knyght wrote:Sooooo anyway. How about that leftism.... Pretty sweet, right?

That sweetness would be the fruits of your labour which the capitalists withheld from you. ;)

Is 100% of surplus value going to the remuneration of labour really a desirable end? How will this cover capital depreciation, the expansion of production, or rainy-day funds? Surely profit still exists in socialism (it has to in any economic system that is sustainable), just that this process is socialised instead of kept private.
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:22 pm

Arkolon wrote:
Conscentia wrote:That sweetness would be the fruits of your labour which the capitalists withheld from you. ;)

Is 100% of surplus value going to the remuneration of labour really a desirable end? How will this cover capital depreciation, the expansion of production, or rainy-day funds? Surely profit still exists in socialism (it has to in any economic system that is sustainable), just that this process is socialised instead of kept private.

... Well, you sure took that remark very seriously.

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:33 pm

Conscentia wrote:
Arkolon wrote:Is 100% of surplus value going to the remuneration of labour really a desirable end? How will this cover capital depreciation, the expansion of production, or rainy-day funds? Surely profit still exists in socialism (it has to in any economic system that is sustainable), just that this process is socialised instead of kept private.

... Well, you sure took that remark very seriously.

It's a question I've asked many times, I have to re-raise it every time it can come up. Everyone's happy to say "full fruit of my labour" but no one's explained what this means for savings and investment.
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
Greater Beggnig
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1466
Founded: Jan 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Beggnig » Wed Jul 27, 2016 12:36 am

Northern Davincia wrote:
The Grene Knyght wrote:Who would've thought that Northern Davincia was the capitialists all along.
Jinkies!

Does this mean that Jeremy Corbyn can be the talking dog?


Corbyn and Bernie, eh?
"I'm not a dictator. It's just that I have a grumpy face."
-Augusto Pinochet

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17210
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kubra » Wed Jul 27, 2016 1:44 am

Arkolon wrote:
Conscentia wrote:That sweetness would be the fruits of your labour which the capitalists withheld from you. ;)

Is 100% of surplus value going to the remuneration of labour really a desirable end? How will this cover capital depreciation, the expansion of production, or rainy-day funds? Surely profit still exists in socialism (it has to in any economic system that is sustainable), just that this process is socialised instead of kept private.
100% remuneration has never been in anyone's theoretical roster, neither Marx or Proudhon. Where it seems to be the case, it's meant socially, not individually.
It's just sloganeering, or perhaps "bants" is more appropriate
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:00 am

The New Sea Territory wrote:
Yorkers wrote:
Convince me, as an investor, to put my money into a collective.


Fuck investment, our collective will loot what it needs from the looters of the world: the bourgeoisie!

Good luck with that.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
Bakery Hill
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11973
Founded: Jul 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Bakery Hill » Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:03 am

Northern Davincia wrote:
The New Sea Territory wrote:
Fuck investment, our collective will loot what it needs from the looters of the world: the bourgeoisie!

Good luck with that.

Cheers comrade.
Founder of the Committee for Proletarian Morality - Winner of Best Communist Award 2018 - Godfather of NSG Syndicalism

User avatar
The newfound islands
Envoy
 
Posts: 286
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The newfound islands » Wed Jul 27, 2016 9:27 am

The Grene Knyght wrote:
The newfound islands wrote:I know and the liberals also think that the government should dictate what we do oh but that's somehow freedom oh yes sir let's have the government tell me what to eat,who to marry,who to vote for and everything else oh yes that's freedom alright. :roll:
The newfound islands wrote:the state is not the government what the hell are you even talking about.Image

Please stop omg is this a parody account? I can't take any more :rofl:

no this is not a parody account and you leftist are all for big government and you know what big government does it restricts people's freedoms and i'm way more for state's rights than the government. :p
I belive that we can not have another Clinton in the white house TRUMP2016 and i'm a proud Christian, I love ISRAEL, i'm a proud gay rights supporter, I love AMERICA, i'm pro life, i'm pro gun rights and if I offend anyone by putting these things out in the open I don't care.

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Wed Jul 27, 2016 9:34 am

The newfound islands wrote:
The Grene Knyght wrote:Please stop omg is this a parody account? I can't take any more :rofl:

no this is not a parody account and you leftist are all for big government and you know what big government does it restricts people's freedoms and i'm way more for state's rights than the government. :p

States can still expand into a big government. I live in New York so it isn't that hard to imagine what a liberal hellhole looks like.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
Bogdanov Vishniac
Minister
 
Posts: 2065
Founded: May 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Bogdanov Vishniac » Wed Jul 27, 2016 9:34 am

The newfound islands wrote:no this is not a parody account and you leftist are all for big government


Really? Wow that's news to us anarchists.

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Wed Jul 27, 2016 9:41 am

Kubra wrote:
Arkolon wrote:Is 100% of surplus value going to the remuneration of labour really a desirable end? How will this cover capital depreciation, the expansion of production, or rainy-day funds? Surely profit still exists in socialism (it has to in any economic system that is sustainable), just that this process is socialised instead of kept private.
100% remuneration has never been in anyone's theoretical roster, neither Marx or Proudhon. Where it seems to be the case, it's meant socially, not individually.
It's just sloganeering, or perhaps "bants" is more appropriate

Why is it used as an argument though? Surely the "theft" of the capitalist is the same action as the "theft" of the collective, just shone through a different lens - and so, either theft in both cases (which is consequentially unsustainable if avoided), or alternatively not theft at all.
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
The newfound islands
Envoy
 
Posts: 286
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The newfound islands » Wed Jul 27, 2016 9:57 am

Bogdanov Vishniac wrote:
The newfound islands wrote:no this is not a parody account and you leftist are all for big government


Really? Wow that's news to us anarchists.

umm anarchy is a right-wing view.
I belive that we can not have another Clinton in the white house TRUMP2016 and i'm a proud Christian, I love ISRAEL, i'm a proud gay rights supporter, I love AMERICA, i'm pro life, i'm pro gun rights and if I offend anyone by putting these things out in the open I don't care.

User avatar
The newfound islands
Envoy
 
Posts: 286
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The newfound islands » Wed Jul 27, 2016 9:58 am

Northern Davincia wrote:
The newfound islands wrote:no this is not a parody account and you leftist are all for big government and you know what big government does it restricts people's freedoms and i'm way more for state's rights than the government. :p

States can still expand into a big government. I live in New York so it isn't that hard to imagine what a liberal hellhole looks like.

yeah thanks to your mayor bill de blilasio.
I belive that we can not have another Clinton in the white house TRUMP2016 and i'm a proud Christian, I love ISRAEL, i'm a proud gay rights supporter, I love AMERICA, i'm pro life, i'm pro gun rights and if I offend anyone by putting these things out in the open I don't care.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Immoren, La Cocina del Bodhi, Shrillland, The Xenopolis Confederation

Advertisement

Remove ads