NATION

PASSWORD

Aravean Coup OOC Thread

A staging-point for declarations of war and other major diplomatic events. [In character]
User avatar
Aravea
Senator
 
Posts: 3776
Founded: Oct 31, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Aravean Coup OOC Thread

Postby Aravea » Sun Mar 29, 2015 2:02 pm

This the discussion/planning thread for the Aravean coup rp. Please keep all ooc related matters within this thread.
Proud Deputy Speaker of the INTERNATIONAL FREEDOM COALITION!
★★★Proud Intelligence Minister of the United Monarchist Alliance★★★
Note: Currently in the process of overhauling the Aravean factbooks/canon.

User avatar
Inyourfaceistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12605
Founded: Aug 20, 2012
Anarchy

Postby Inyourfaceistan » Sun Mar 29, 2015 2:06 pm

Hitting back at the IFC for Carloso's poorly-tasteful propaganda drawing:
Image


It's not French,it's not Spanish,it's Inyurstan
"Inyourfaceistan" refers to my player/user name, "Inyursta" is my IC name. NOT INYURSTAN. IF YOU CALL INYURSTA "INYURSTAN" THEN IT SHOWS THAT YOU CANT READ. Just refer to me as IYF or Stan.

User avatar
Allied Connurist States
Minister
 
Posts: 2882
Founded: Jul 15, 2014
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Allied Connurist States » Sun Mar 29, 2015 2:08 pm

I think it'd be a good idea to set out who's on what side

as in which nations are supporting
a) Military government
b) Deposed Primarch

and then c) neutral nations
Brytene wrote:brb gonna goteach some spanish people the secrets of a tasty lancashire hotpot as part of my secret imperialist ambitions

#ValaranSoSexy | I BELIEVE IN THE EASTER CAMEL | Excellent Stallion-Like Gentleman, Commander of Ugandan Skies, Rabbipriest of Amin Temple Kampala, Commissar of DPRK State Facilities, of Excellent Stallion-Like Affairs ,and of Internet Surveillance.Glory to Idi Amin! Remove the Obote scum!

User avatar
Inyourfaceistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12605
Founded: Aug 20, 2012
Anarchy

Postby Inyourfaceistan » Sun Mar 29, 2015 2:12 pm

Allied Connurist States wrote:I think it'd be a good idea to set out who's on what side

as in which nations are supporting
a) Military government
b) Deposed Primarch

and then c) neutral nations


I thought the deposed "Primarch" was elected on an anti-leftist platform which caused the commies/pinkos/nazis/socialists/reds/faux-anarchists/ect to riot/revolt which then caused the coup.

If that were true then would the deposed government theoretically support the coup for the time being?


It's not French,it's not Spanish,it's Inyurstan
"Inyourfaceistan" refers to my player/user name, "Inyursta" is my IC name. NOT INYURSTAN. IF YOU CALL INYURSTA "INYURSTAN" THEN IT SHOWS THAT YOU CANT READ. Just refer to me as IYF or Stan.

User avatar
Allied Connurist States
Minister
 
Posts: 2882
Founded: Jul 15, 2014
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Allied Connurist States » Sun Mar 29, 2015 2:17 pm

Inyourfaceistan wrote:
Allied Connurist States wrote:I think it'd be a good idea to set out who's on what side

as in which nations are supporting
a) Military government
b) Deposed Primarch

and then c) neutral nations


I thought the deposed "Primarch" was elected on an anti-leftist platform which caused the commies/pinkos/nazis/socialists/reds/faux-anarchists/ect to riot/revolt which then caused the coup.

If that were true then would the deposed government theoretically support the coup for the time being?

I'm sure they would rather be in power than the military

And still, I imagine the Primarch is less anti-left than the military
Brytene wrote:brb gonna goteach some spanish people the secrets of a tasty lancashire hotpot as part of my secret imperialist ambitions

#ValaranSoSexy | I BELIEVE IN THE EASTER CAMEL | Excellent Stallion-Like Gentleman, Commander of Ugandan Skies, Rabbipriest of Amin Temple Kampala, Commissar of DPRK State Facilities, of Excellent Stallion-Like Affairs ,and of Internet Surveillance.Glory to Idi Amin! Remove the Obote scum!

User avatar
Arcerion
Senator
 
Posts: 3937
Founded: Jan 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Arcerion » Sun Mar 29, 2015 2:21 pm

Tagging, expect an IC post soonish.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:I went to a fight once but then a hockey game broke out.

User avatar
New Roma Republic
Minister
 
Posts: 2579
Founded: Mar 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Roma Republic » Sun Mar 29, 2015 3:48 pm

Tag
IC call me NRI, Novus Romanum Imperium, or the New Roman Imperium; OOC call me Roma or New Roma
NRI General Information | NRI Military Overview
Proud Member of the INTERNATIONAL FREEDOM COALITION! | #ValaranSoFab

User avatar
Patrick OConner
Minister
 
Posts: 2278
Founded: Sep 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Patrick OConner » Sun Mar 29, 2015 4:25 pm

so how are things inign up exactly>\? who is on whoses side?
Currenetly i am pro Armstrong but if she does not come through on here promises then that will change very quickly

All thinks related to ORBAT
http://www.nationstates.net/nation=patr ... /id=319605
http://www.nationstates.net/nation=patr ... /id=324859
http://www.nationstates.net/nation=patr ... /id=317662
http://www.nationstates.net/nation=patr ... /id=315956
Last edited by Patrick OConner on Sun Mar 29, 2015 7:10 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Member of Task Force Atlas
IATA Member

I choose the second definition of it. This meaning rule by virtue and not owning land to be allowed to vote or hold political office. Instead one is required to serve time in the military (currently 6 years)



Tech Level: Mix MT/PMT

User avatar
Arcerion
Senator
 
Posts: 3937
Founded: Jan 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Arcerion » Sun Mar 29, 2015 5:01 pm

My current ORBAT. More will be flown in daily.
Last edited by Arcerion on Sun Mar 29, 2015 5:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:I went to a fight once but then a hockey game broke out.

User avatar
Riysa
Senator
 
Posts: 4448
Founded: Jan 07, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Riysa » Sun Mar 29, 2015 6:58 pm

Moving in the Riysian Air Force to Oured, with Aravea's prior permission.

Commander: Liwa' (Major General) Asim Hanano
Forces - Aerial Task Force "Muhyidin":

32nd Fighter Wing
Commander: Asim Hanano
Total personnel: ~1,500

137th Fighter Squadron
Commander: Lieutenant Colonel Jadid al-Daddar
24 x TaH-29T-4
Total personnel: ~410

55th Fighter Squadron
Commander: Colonel Hamzah al-Tarabishi
24 x TaH-29T-4
Total personnel: ~410

124th Fighter Squadron
Commander: Colonel Abbas al-Kharraat
24 x TaH-31AJ
Total personnel: ~410

Attached Elements:

2nd Strategic Anti-Air Missile Battalion (9th Regiment)
Commander: Major Riad Shamsi
NDJ Qanas SAM battalion - 3 firing batteries, 1 DECM battery
Firing battery - 6 TELs, command post, 1 RK-600 search radar, 1 RK-500, RDJ-500, and/or RDJ-500L target acquisition and fire control radar, ELS system.

22nd Bomber Squadron
Commander: Colonel Yasin Izzat
24 Da-30 bombers

1st Flight, 3rd Early Warning Squadron
Commander: Major Ihsan Abdul-Aziz
4 Da-28 AEW&C craft

3rd Flight, 29th Tanker Squadron

4th Electronic Support Squadron
Last edited by Riysa on Mon Mar 30, 2015 1:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Inyourfaceistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12605
Founded: Aug 20, 2012
Anarchy

Postby Inyourfaceistan » Sun Mar 29, 2015 7:17 pm

Wait what?
I thought the elected government was anti-leftist?
Not one of the *insert bad things communists, socialists, nazis, and other Radicals Against Private Enterprise-ists do here*
WTF is going on?
Last edited by Inyourfaceistan on Sun Mar 29, 2015 7:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.


It's not French,it's not Spanish,it's Inyurstan
"Inyourfaceistan" refers to my player/user name, "Inyursta" is my IC name. NOT INYURSTAN. IF YOU CALL INYURSTA "INYURSTAN" THEN IT SHOWS THAT YOU CANT READ. Just refer to me as IYF or Stan.

User avatar
Aravea
Senator
 
Posts: 3776
Founded: Oct 31, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Aravea » Sun Mar 29, 2015 7:27 pm

Just to head this off there has been a retcon to the government in exile. It is now composed of a more liberal party with leftist leanings and sympathies with several leftist organizations.
Proud Deputy Speaker of the INTERNATIONAL FREEDOM COALITION!
★★★Proud Intelligence Minister of the United Monarchist Alliance★★★
Note: Currently in the process of overhauling the Aravean factbooks/canon.

User avatar
Inyourfaceistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12605
Founded: Aug 20, 2012
Anarchy

Postby Inyourfaceistan » Sun Mar 29, 2015 7:31 pm

Aravea wrote:Just to head this off there has been a retcon to the government in exile. It is now composed of a more liberal party with leftist leanings and sympathies with several leftist organizations.


Okay...
Looks like I will have to take the "fraudulent elections" angle...

And I assume you mean Faux-liberal?


It's not French,it's not Spanish,it's Inyurstan
"Inyourfaceistan" refers to my player/user name, "Inyursta" is my IC name. NOT INYURSTAN. IF YOU CALL INYURSTA "INYURSTAN" THEN IT SHOWS THAT YOU CANT READ. Just refer to me as IYF or Stan.

User avatar
Libraria and Ausitoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7099
Founded: May 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Libraria and Ausitoria » Mon Mar 30, 2015 1:01 am

Since this is a busy time of year for some of us (end of tax year in the UK coming up), may I request that we keep things going slowly, particularly in the opening stages, which require large scale diplomacy?

There are also a few points which should be cleared up in advance:
New Aeyariss wrote:@Aigentair

Don Cuscatlone wrote:Also you guys would have nothing about me and few SACTO members going after commerce trade of any IFC nation involved in the crisis (Just asking)?

Pretty much I plan to hire pirates and begin unrestricted submarine warfare against every IFC nation supporting Aravean government in Exile. Just checking if you are okay with this.


I am not ok with this. If you extend the war to cover all oceans, we will have a general war very rapidly, and those SACTO members will suddenly find very large Ausitorian fleets off their coasts. I thought the idea was to limit the war to Aravea?
The Aestorian Commonwealth - Pax Prosperitas - Gloria in Maere - (Factbook)

Disclaimer: Notwithstanding any mention of their nations, Ausitoria and its canon does not exist nor impact the canon of many IFC & SACTO & closed-region nations; and it is harassment to presume it does. However in accordance with my open-door policy the converse does not apply: they still impact Ausitoria's canon.
○ Commonwealth Capital (Bank) ○ ○ Commonwealth Connect (Bank Treaty) ○ ○ SeaScape (Shipping & Energy) ○
(██████████████████████████████║║◙█[Θ]█]◙◙◙◙◙[█]

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:00 am

Libraria and Ausitoria wrote:
New Aeyariss wrote:@Aigentair



I am not ok with this. If you extend the war to cover all oceans, we will have a general war very rapidly, and those SACTO members will suddenly find very large Ausitorian fleets off their coasts. I thought the idea was to limit the war to Aravea?



Seconded. If trade is affected (and yes going after my allies will affect my trade too, along with a load of other nations) then Valaran fleets will begin deployments.

We'd probably start by hunting down all the pirates and systematically annihilating every one. But the subs might be fair game too.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
New Aeyariss
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: May 12, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby New Aeyariss » Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:06 am

@Valaran, @LAA:

I do not know if you are aware but in case of another "War of Wrath" it is IFC which is in far worse situation, and this is because many SACTO nations (tough not all, it is less than a half, but me, Americania, TECT for example) do not have capped populations these days, and this are huge populations (like 8-12 billion). This is exactly why I had not went for another war of wrath. Don't worry - I do not intend to bring more than IFC members can handle into this thread ;).

I will see about commercial raiding, I believe that we can work something out here.
Rping in MT (2023) and PT/FanT (1564)


Inyourfaceistan wrote:You didn't know that Cusc is actually a 4-armed cyborg genius commander and skillful warrior created in secret by a cabal of rich capitalist financiers built to lead and army of drones and other renegades against and overbearing socialist regime?
Psalms 144:1 wrote:Blessed be the LORD my strength, which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight.
Also known as El Cuscatlan, Jesus will offer you eternal life if you believe in him!


User avatar
Libraria and Ausitoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7099
Founded: May 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Libraria and Ausitoria » Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:12 am

New Aeyariss wrote:@Valaran, @LAA:

I do not know if you are aware but in case of another "War of Wrath" it is IFC which is in far worse situation, and this is because many SACTO nations (tough not all, it is less than a half, but me, Americania, TECT for example) do not have capped populations these days, and this are huge populations (like 8-12 billion).

I will see about commercial raiding, I believe that we can work something out here.

I don't. I am easily in the position to RP with an uncapped population, and, in addition, Ausitorian trade is so important to the nation that an attack could lead to Ausitoria using its reciprocity doctrine, leading to an extremely large scale war, probably including (conventional) ICBMs.

Now obviously all sides would wish to avoid such large-scale escalation to total war, and that means we must agree to limit war to Aravea, no exceptions; assuming we don't want to escalate to the point where everybody would be radioactive dust when the RP is finished.
Last edited by Libraria and Ausitoria on Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:27 am, edited 3 times in total.
The Aestorian Commonwealth - Pax Prosperitas - Gloria in Maere - (Factbook)

Disclaimer: Notwithstanding any mention of their nations, Ausitoria and its canon does not exist nor impact the canon of many IFC & SACTO & closed-region nations; and it is harassment to presume it does. However in accordance with my open-door policy the converse does not apply: they still impact Ausitoria's canon.
○ Commonwealth Capital (Bank) ○ ○ Commonwealth Connect (Bank Treaty) ○ ○ SeaScape (Shipping & Energy) ○
(██████████████████████████████║║◙█[Θ]█]◙◙◙◙◙[█]

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:20 am

New Aeyariss wrote:@Valaran, @LAA:

I do not know if you are aware but in case of another "War of Wrath" it is IFC which is in far worse situation, and this is because many SACTO nations (tough not all, it is less than a half, but me, Americania, TECT for example) do not have capped populations these days, and this are huge populations (like 8-12 billion). This is exactly why I had not went for another war of wrath.



This whole first part isn't especially relevant.


I will see about commercial raiding, I believe that we can work something out here.


Open to suggestions.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
New Aeyariss
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: May 12, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby New Aeyariss » Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:25 am

@Val, it is.

Affirmative, I have no problems with it. Thanks for cooperation, I won' t target anything outside Aravean theatre.
Rping in MT (2023) and PT/FanT (1564)


Inyourfaceistan wrote:You didn't know that Cusc is actually a 4-armed cyborg genius commander and skillful warrior created in secret by a cabal of rich capitalist financiers built to lead and army of drones and other renegades against and overbearing socialist regime?
Psalms 144:1 wrote:Blessed be the LORD my strength, which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight.
Also known as El Cuscatlan, Jesus will offer you eternal life if you believe in him!


User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:26 am

New Aeyariss wrote:@Val, it is.


Nah. You just wanted to say the IFC is weak. ;)

New Aeyariss wrote:
Affirmative, I have no problems with it. Thanks for cooperation, I won' t target anything outside Aravean theatre.


No problems then :)
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
New Aeyariss
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: May 12, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby New Aeyariss » Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:33 am

@Val if I wanted to tell that IFC is weak I would have told it directly. Population of RPer does not automatically translate on military effectivness.

I was not saying IFC is weak. I wanted to say that I do not believe that "War of Wrath" is possible OOC wise.
Rping in MT (2023) and PT/FanT (1564)


Inyourfaceistan wrote:You didn't know that Cusc is actually a 4-armed cyborg genius commander and skillful warrior created in secret by a cabal of rich capitalist financiers built to lead and army of drones and other renegades against and overbearing socialist regime?
Psalms 144:1 wrote:Blessed be the LORD my strength, which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight.
Also known as El Cuscatlan, Jesus will offer you eternal life if you believe in him!


User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:34 am

New Aeyariss wrote:@Val if I wanted to tell that IFC is weak I would have told it directly. Population of RPer does not automatically translate on military effectivness.

I was not saying IFC is weak. I wanted to say that I do not believe that "War of Wrath" is possible OOC wise.


New Aeyariss wrote:
I do not know if you are aware but in case of another "War of Wrath" it is IFC which is in far worse situation


Is that not saying we are weak?

You say the same on our thread too (is that not direct?). And that^ doesn't sound OOC related.
Last edited by Valaran on Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Aeyariss
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5088
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Aeyariss » Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:36 am

sending some peackemaker forces soon, expect orbat to be posted in the near future

User avatar
Libraria and Ausitoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7099
Founded: May 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Libraria and Ausitoria » Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:38 am

If I may, I would like to refer us to this little Ausitorian policy document on deterrence, to ensure we're all on the same page. It outlines precisely why a war on the scale of a War of Wrath is possible ICly, but why it would almost certainly escalate directly to nuclear warfare.

And that is why it's OOCly not possible.

It applies to any significant warfare, so I do hope all members of SACTO will read it before they commit major parts of their forces: it is very important that they avoid accidentally (or deliberately) escalating.
The Aestorian Commonwealth - Pax Prosperitas - Gloria in Maere - (Factbook)

Disclaimer: Notwithstanding any mention of their nations, Ausitoria and its canon does not exist nor impact the canon of many IFC & SACTO & closed-region nations; and it is harassment to presume it does. However in accordance with my open-door policy the converse does not apply: they still impact Ausitoria's canon.
○ Commonwealth Capital (Bank) ○ ○ Commonwealth Connect (Bank Treaty) ○ ○ SeaScape (Shipping & Energy) ○
(██████████████████████████████║║◙█[Θ]█]◙◙◙◙◙[█]

User avatar
Common Territories
Senator
 
Posts: 4745
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Common Territories » Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:47 am

New Aeyariss wrote:@Valaran, @LAA:

I do not know if you are aware but in case of another "War of Wrath" it is IFC which is in far worse situation, and this is because many SACTO nations (tough not all, it is less than a half, but me, Americania, TECT for example) do not have capped populations these days, and this are huge populations (like 8-12 billion). This is exactly why I had not went for another war of wrath. Don't worry - I do not intend to bring more than IFC members can handle into this thread ;).

I will see about commercial raiding, I believe that we can work something out here.


My population is capped for your info. My country is just larger then most around since it encompass a continent and colonies. That doesn't mean I don't cap things - both my population and military counts are capped. I do hold back generally from using my capable strengths, that's about all.

Edit: I am in all honesty not afraid of your nuclear threats or your perceived large war threat. If you think no SACTO member can't do the same, or if that I myself couldn't, you are dead wrong. I'll believe you are capable of holding a war when you actually show what you are capable of. Because quite frankly, your warnings frighten me none.
Last edited by Common Territories on Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:59 am, edited 1 time in total.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to International Incidents

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arakhkhar, Cossack Peoples, Gravistar, Republic Under Specters Grasp

Advertisement

Remove ads