Is this the end of an Era for NationStates???

[Indian Empire]

Is this the end of an era for Nationstates?

Well, first, let's define what "Era" would mean in Nationstates terms. In RL terms, here is the definition of "Era".

A long and distinct period of history with a particular feature or characteristic.

Although this is kind of what I mean, let's define here what we are missing. What I mean by "Era" would be when nations and regions from the past (Past means like somewhere between 2007 to 2010 in our case) either die off or become less influential in Nationstates. Good examples are: Afforess, Milograd, Divair, etc. This would mean that newer nations (Nations from 2011 to 2013) become more influential. Do you think we have begun a new era, are we in a transition kind of mode, or do you think an "Era" even exists in Nationstates?

[Conscentia]

This is in the wrong forum. You should ask for this to be moved.

[Old Tyrannia]

Old nations leave us all the time. It's sad but it happens. I don't think this means that NationStates is at the "end of an era."

[Benevolent Thomas]

I only think one name in your list is even worth remembering. We're still in the middle of an era. The era of petty and lame ass GCR drama

[Indian Empire]

Old nations leave us all the time. It's sad but it happens. I don't think this means that NationStates is at the "end of an era."

I have noticed a distinct increase in old departures in NS lately.

[Ramaeus]

Hardly. Milograd is the only name on your list who is particularly noteworthy. The rest have hardly had any impact whatsoever. Nice try, though.

[Indian Empire]

Hardly. Milograd is the only name on your list who is particularly noteworthy. The rest have hardly had any impact whatsoever. Nice try, though.

List edited in attempt to make the list with more substantial names and more accurate.

[The Leningrad Union]

I only think one name in your list is even worth remembering. We're still in the middle of an era. The era of petty and lame ass GCR drama

I agree, I'm the most influential guy here

[The Leningrad Union]

How is Thafoo influential? I mean, I liked him and all but all he did was post on TET and run an LGBT region of non-GPers....

[Indian Empire]

I only think one name in your list is even worth remembering. We're still in the middle of an era. The era of petty and lame ass GCR drama

I agree, I'm the most influential guy here

B.. B.. But... I thought I heard you were leaving NS! Yet, he posts in the thread created by me.

[The Leningrad Union]

I agree, I'm the most influential guy here

B.. B.. But... I thought I heard you were leaving NS! Yet, he posts in the thread created by me.

Not entirely.

[Ramaeus]

List edited in attempt to make the list with more substantial names and more accurate.

How have Generalites influenced GP? Additionally, most weren't particularity distraught over Afforess' departure. You appear to be judging influence based on your skewed perceptions. That is, by far, the worst way to go about judging impact.

[Indian Empire]

Wow, the peoples are divided on this issue. if the poll were to have 2 options, Yes or No to having eras, the results would be 53% yes, 47% No.

[Indian Empire]

List edited in attempt to make the list with more substantial names and more accurate.

How have Generalites influenced GP? Additionally, most weren't particularity distraught over Afforess' departure. You appear to be judging influence based on your skewed perceptions. That is, by far, the worst way to go about judging impact.

I'm going with old, Influential nations I knew of off the top of my mind, that were gone or lost influence recently.

[Britanania]

The only thing I have noticed is that since the beginning of this summer, the quality of RPs has dropped substantially

[Blekksprutia]

Is this the end of an era for Nationstates?

Well, first, let's define what "Era" would mean in Nationstates terms. In RL terms, here is the definition of "Era".

A long and distinct period of history with a particular feature or characteristic.

Although this is kind of what I mean, let's define here what we are missing. What I mean by "Era" would be when nations and regions from the past (Past means like somewhere between 2007 to 2010 in our case) either die off or become less influential in Nationstates. Good examples are: Afforess, Milograd, Divair, etc. This would mean that newer nations (Nations from 2011 to 2013) become more influential. Do you think we have begun a new era, are we in a transition kind of mode, or do you think an "Era" even exists in Nationstates?

not to mention Thafoo

[Indian Empire]

The only thing I have noticed is that since the beginning of this summer, the quality of RPs has dropped substantially

I started with nations deleted this year, not just over the summer.

[Indian Empire]

Is this the end of an era for Nationstates?

Well, first, let's define what "Era" would mean in Nationstates terms. In RL terms, here is the definition of "Era".

A long and distinct period of history with a particular feature or characteristic.

Although this is kind of what I mean, let's define here what we are missing. What I mean by "Era" would be when nations and regions from the past (Past means like somewhere between 2007 to 2010 in our case) either die off or become less influential in Nationstates. Good examples are: Afforess, Milograd, Divair, etc. This would mean that newer nations (Nations from 2011 to 2013) become more influential. Do you think we have begun a new era, are we in a transition kind of mode, or do you think an "Era" even exists in Nationstates?

not to mention Thafoo

Thafoo was JUST removed from this list, and then someone comes around who wants Thafoo back on the list.

[Applebania]

How have Generalites influenced GP?

He said Nationstates, not GP.

[The Leningrad Union]

Is this the end of an era for Nationstates?

Well, first, let's define what "Era" would mean in Nationstates terms. In RL terms, here is the definition of "Era".

A long and distinct period of history with a particular feature or characteristic.

Although this is kind of what I mean, let's define here what we are missing. What I mean by "Era" would be when nations and regions from the past (Past means like somewhere between 2007 to 2010 in our case) either die off or become less influential in Nationstates. Good examples are: Afforess, Milograd, Divair, etc. This would mean that newer nations (Nations from 2011 to 2013) become more influential. Do you think we have begun a new era, are we in a transition kind of mode, or do you think an "Era" even exists in Nationstates?

not to mention Thafoo

He didn't leave much of an impact or do much on NS though, he was just popular

[Ramaeus]

He said Nationstates, not GP.

And yet, this was posted within Gameplay.

[Indian Empire]

He said Nationstates, not GP.

And yet, this was posted within Gameplay.

I requested a move.

[Applebania]

He said Nationstates, not GP.

And yet, this was posted within Gameplay.

This is in the wrong forum. You should ask for this to be moved.

Judging from this quote, this thread didn't start off in GP. I'm pretty sure Conscentia is a generalite.

[Blekksprutia]

my "heyday" ended right around when TET was put on hold. the people who I knew when I first joined (Thafoo, Slembana, Cheri, De la fleur, Liriena) are either inactive or long gone but their memories remain. on the bright side, I, along with HorusLand/Rikatan, Aeken and Coffee Cakes am the senior generation for my 'new' group of friends (United regions of verona, Zottistan, Uieurnthlaal, Iceland Republic, New Nassrau, Nasal Bondage) mostly in Kotturheim. there's always a life cycle, even on the internet, and I've had and am still having a great time here

[Blekksprutia]

not to mention Thafoo

He didn't leave much of an impact or do much on NS though, he was just popular

He left a huge impact with the TET community.