NATION

PASSWORD

Should churches, etc have tax exempt status?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Should religious organizations have tax exempt status?

Yes, leave them tax exempt
55
38%
Yes, and subsidize them!
5
3%
No, tax them like any other private entity
39
27%
No, but they should for charitable activities, like any other nonprofit organization
47
32%
 
Total votes : 146

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Should churches, etc have tax exempt status?

Postby Atlanticatia » Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:51 pm

In many countries, churches are exempt from paying tax. In the US, they're exempt from federal tax, sales taxes, local and state taxes, property taxes, and donations to churches are tax-deductible. In some cases, they might be exempt from sales taxes, etc.

The First Amendment reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Proponents of tax exemption for churches make the argument that it keeps the state from the church - i.e. if the church pays no tax, they won't try to influence the government. Churches provide many services to the public and should be tax exempt. Many people would suffer if churches had less resources available to them. Generally, it's seen as a constitutional right.

Opponents of tax exemption for churches make the argument that it violates the separation of church and state, and the government is losing out on serious tax revenues. According to one estimate, churches own over $300-$500bn of property, and New York City alone is losing out on $627m in tax revenues. While nonprofits have to file a tax return, but might not have to pay tax, churches don't even have to file a tax return. Huge amounts of taxes are not being collected, with $82.5 billion as a very conservative estimate.

In my opinion, churches should not be tax exempt. If they perform charitable activities, and would qualify as a non-profit organization, they should receive the same tax advantages as a nonprofit, but they should not receive any special status because of their religious status. The state should not give any preference to religion - which it is doing by exempting churches from taxation.

Also, the definition of a 'church' or 'religious organization' is becoming increasingly muddled. Who decides what is considered eligible for tax exemption? Should, for example, the Church of Scientology be exempt? Should we exempt the Flying Spaghetti Monster Church? Also, I think that the idea of church tax exemption is much different from the reality.
Many people think of a small, neighborhood church that does a lot of good for the community when they think of tax-exempt churches. However, there are many 'megachurches' - which are arguably doing many things 'for profit', and don't really deserve any special status. Here's one stat - "US Senator Chuck Grassley, MA (R-IA) launched an investigation into these groups in Nov. 2007 after receiving complaints of church revenue being used to buy pastors private jets, Rolls Royce cars, multimillion-dollar homes, trips to Hawaii and Fiji, and in one case, a $23,000, marble-topped chest of drawers installed in the 150,000 square foot headquarters of Joyce Meyer Ministries in Fenton, Missouri." Also, many pastors/ministers receive tax-exempt status on their homes - which might be very lavish and expensive. Should they be exempt from tax? Another quote: "Church leaders Creflo and Taffi Dollar of World Changers Church International had three tax-free parsonages: a million-dollar mansion in Atlanta, GA, a two-million-dollar mansion in Fayetteville, GA, [63] and a $2.5 million Manhattan apartment. [64] Kenneth and Gloria Copeland, leaders of Kenneth Copeland Ministries in Fort Worth, TX, live in a church-owned, tax-free $6.2 million lakefront parsonage."
We are missing out on tens of billions of dollars - maybe even hundreds - by not taxing churches. Churches should be taxed just like any other private entity, and if they are a nonprofit, they should receive nonprofit/charitable status. I think that it's archaic and odd to exempt churches from tax in what should be a secular society/state, not a theocracy.


So, what does NSG think? Should churches/religious organizations receive special tax-exempt status?
Last edited by Atlanticatia on Mon Aug 25, 2014 12:10 am, edited 2 times in total.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Gingeska
Diplomat
 
Posts: 620
Founded: May 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Gingeska » Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:59 pm

Everything should have tax exempt status with the exception of sales-tax.

No income tax, no property tax, no "special" taxes on certain goods.

Just a percentage of all sales.

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:00 pm

Churches should be classified as non-profits.

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:01 pm

Depends. If they're making a surplus profit, then that's business and hence taxable.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54796
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:02 pm

Pandeeria wrote:Depends. If they're making a surplus profit, then that's business and hence taxable.


Pretty much.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Bombadil
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18714
Founded: Oct 13, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bombadil » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:09 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:Proponents of tax exemption for churches make the argument that it keeps the state from the church - i.e. if the church pays no tax, they won't try to influence the government.


Is that really the logic? Surely the other way round, that in paying taxes Churches would be at the mercy of government in making laws that impact on the establishment of a church.. not that there aren't rules anyway but still..
Eldest, that's what I am...Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn...he knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless — before the Dark Lord came from Outside..

十年

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:12 pm

Gingeska wrote:Everything should have tax exempt status with the exception of sales-tax.

No income tax, no property tax, no "special" taxes on certain goods.

Just a percentage of all sales.


No.

That would make sales tax unbelievably high. Unless you're one of those people that call for extreme low taxation. In which case, still no.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:15 pm

Churches have tax exempt status because beyond being a church they are also supposed to be non-profit, non-taxable organizations.

If the church is making a profit they should lose their privileged status.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:17 pm

Bombadil wrote:
Atlanticatia wrote:Proponents of tax exemption for churches make the argument that it keeps the state from the church - i.e. if the church pays no tax, they won't try to influence the government.


Is that really the logic? Surely the other way round, that in paying taxes Churches would be at the mercy of government in making laws that impact on the establishment of a church.. not that there aren't rules anyway but still..


People say that if churches don't pay tax, they have no authority to play a role in politics, or something.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Bombadil
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18714
Founded: Oct 13, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bombadil » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:17 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:
Bombadil wrote:
Is that really the logic? Surely the other way round, that in paying taxes Churches would be at the mercy of government in making laws that impact on the establishment of a church.. not that there aren't rules anyway but still..


People say that if churches don't pay tax, they have no authority to play a role in politics, or something.


Ha ha, that's worked real well.
Eldest, that's what I am...Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn...he knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless — before the Dark Lord came from Outside..

十年

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:18 pm

Bombadil wrote:
Atlanticatia wrote:
People say that if churches don't pay tax, they have no authority to play a role in politics, or something.


Ha ha, that's worked real well.


*looks at American Congress and the Religious Right*
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Gingeska
Diplomat
 
Posts: 620
Founded: May 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Gingeska » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:18 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
Gingeska wrote:Everything should have tax exempt status with the exception of sales-tax.

No income tax, no property tax, no "special" taxes on certain goods.

Just a percentage of all sales.


No.

That would make sales tax unbelievably high. Unless you're one of those people that call for extreme low taxation. In which case, still no.


I do support low taxation.

and "yes"

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:24 pm

Gingeska wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:
No.

That would make sales tax unbelievably high. Unless you're one of those people that call for extreme low taxation. In which case, still no.


I do support low taxation.

and "yes"


That would directly hit the worst off and would have a negative impact on demand, if the sales tax was that large.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
SaintB
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21792
Founded: Apr 18, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby SaintB » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:26 pm

It really depends on the church. If the church has holdings in real estate and/or other business ventures (such as the Mormans) than it should have to pay taxes on its income. If it relies on charitable donations the way that the local Methodist Church than it should be exempt as a non-profit.
Hi my name is SaintB and I am prone to sarcasm and hyperbole. Because of this I make no warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the above statement, of its constituent parts, or of any supporting data. These terms are subject to change without notice from myself.

Every day NationStates tells me I have one issue. I am pretty sure I've got more than that.

User avatar
Christian Democrats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10093
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:31 pm

If you want church and state to be separate, it only makes sense not to tax houses of worship.

Atlanticatia wrote:The First Amendment reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Certainly, the government shouldn't charge people for the freedom to practice their faiths.
Last edited by Christian Democrats on Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)^
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)
GA#468: Prohibit Private Prisons (57%)^

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54796
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:32 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:If you want church and state to be separate, it only makes sense not to tax houses of worship.

Atlanticatia wrote:The First Amendment reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Certainly, the government shouldn't charge people for thefreedom to practice their religion.


You are aware other religions are taxed yes?
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Christian Democrats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10093
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:34 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:You are aware other religions are taxed yes?

I'm not sure what you're talking about. Churches, as defined by the IRS, are exempt from taxes in the U.S.

http://www.irs.gov/Charities-&-Non-Profits/Churches-&-Religious-Organizations/Churches--Defined
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)^
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)
GA#468: Prohibit Private Prisons (57%)^

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55273
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:36 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:Proponents of tax exemption for churches make the argument that it keeps the state from the church - i.e. if the church pays no tax, they won't try to influence the government.

They won't try to influence the government FURTHER they mean... and it's evidently false.

Churches provide many services to the public and should be tax exempt.

They provide services to the public, often like a business. The problem is that businesses owned by churches are tax exempt - thus violating the basic rules of fair competition.

While nonprofits have to file a tax return, but might not have to pay tax, churches don't even have to file a tax return.

And one doesn't understand why.

In my opinion, churches should be tax exempt. If they perform charitable activities, and would qualify as a non-profit organization, they should receive the same tax advantages as a nonprofit, but they should not receive any special status because of their religious status.

Eh? :blink: I see contradiction. Being tax-exempt IS a special status!
Although... reading further your post... seems like you missed a negation there.
.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55273
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:37 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:If you want church and state to be separate, it only makes sense not to tax houses of worship.

Atlanticatia wrote:The First Amendment reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Certainly, the government shouldn't charge people for the freedom to practice their faiths.

1.Since when "people" are "churches"?
2.Since when taxing property and profits means prohibiting religious practice?
Last edited by Risottia on Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
.

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54796
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:40 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:You are aware other religions are taxed yes?

I'm not sure what you're talking about. Churches, as defined by the IRS, are exempt from taxes in the U.S.

http://www.irs.gov/Charities-&-Non-Profits/Churches-&-Religious-Organizations/Churches--Defined


>Other religions
>You bring up Churches

You are aware religions other than Christianity exist yes? The IRS codes are shitty at best (the whole tax code sucks but I digress) on what religious groups can and can't be taxed.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:43 pm

Gingeska wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:
No.

That would make sales tax unbelievably high. Unless you're one of those people that call for extreme low taxation. In which case, still no.


I do support low taxation.

and "yes"


That would damage the economy, make infrastructure complete shit, and would lower the standard of living.

So no. If you want shitty infrastructure and no government programs, go to a poor central Asian nation where taxation is virtually unheard of.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Christian Democrats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10093
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:47 pm

Risottia wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:If you want church and state to be separate, it only makes sense not to tax houses of worship.


Certainly, the government shouldn't charge people for the freedom to practice their faiths.

1.Since when "people" are "churches"?
2.Since when taxing property and profits means prohibiting religious practice?

1. Churches have been persons for decades if not longer.

2. You're not all that free to practice your faith if the government is charging you for it. None of the other freedoms named in the First Amendment have taxes associated with them.
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)^
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)
GA#468: Prohibit Private Prisons (57%)^

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:48 pm

Christian Democrats wrote:
Risottia wrote:1.Since when "people" are "churches"?
2.Since when taxing property and profits means prohibiting religious practice?

1. Churches have been persons for decades if not longer.

2. You're not all that free to practice your faith if the government is charging you for it. None of the other freedoms named in the First Amendment have taxes associated with them.

People pay sales taxes when buying firearms.

User avatar
Meridiani Planum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5577
Founded: Nov 03, 2006
Capitalizt

Postby Meridiani Planum » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:51 pm

I don't see why churches must be taxed, but then I want to simplify and minimize taxes.

I'm an atheist, but I can see how churches are community groups that fulfill a role for those religious communities. These are effectively non-profit organizations. Why should one want to discourage such groups with taxes? They don't necessarily have deep pockets. Any taxes would disproportionately affect the churches of poor communities.

I can understand people wondering if "mega-churches" should be taxed, depending on where the money goes. But churches in general? I just don't see the justification unless it is a greed for tax money.
Last edited by Meridiani Planum on Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I shall choose friends among men, but neither slaves nor masters.
- Ayn Rand

User avatar
Christian Democrats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10093
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Christian Democrats » Mon Aug 25, 2014 12:05 am

Othelos wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:1. Churches have been persons for decades if not longer.

2. You're not all that free to practice your faith if the government is charging you for it. None of the other freedoms named in the First Amendment have taxes associated with them.

People pay sales taxes when buying firearms.

:clap:

I'm glad to see how knowledgeable you are about the First Amendment.
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
GA#160: Forced Marriages Ban Act (79%)
GA#175: Organ and Blood Donations Act (68%)^
SC#082: Repeal "Liberate Catholic" (80%)
GA#200: Foreign Marriage Recognition (54%)
GA#213: Privacy Protection Act (70%)
GA#231: Marital Rape Justice Act (81%)^
GA#233: Ban Profits on Workers' Deaths (80%)*
GA#249: Stopping Suicide Seeds (70%)^
GA#253: Repeal "Freedom in Medical Research" (76%)
GA#285: Assisted Suicide Act (70%)^
GA#310: Disabled Voters Act (81%)
GA#373: Repeal "Convention on Execution" (54%)
GA#468: Prohibit Private Prisons (57%)^

* denotes coauthorship
^ repealed resolution
#360: Electile Dysfunction
#452: Foetal Furore
#560: Bicameral Backlash
#570: Clerical Errors

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bermia, Dreadton, Ethel mermania, Google [Bot], HISPIDA, Lycom, Siluvia, Uiiop

Advertisement

Remove ads