[Draft] On mining safety

[Ulil]

Current draft

Category: Environmental Industry Affected: Mining Proposed by:Ulil

Understanding:Mining can be a major source of economic income in a industrialized nations.

Seeing:That safety would need to be a more regulated in this dangerous practice.

Defining: A "mine" a facility and operation where in the extraction of geological materials from the earth occurs
Therefore: Seeing that these practices need more oversight. Creates codes for a "mine" to follow.

1. A mine must update all the safety equipment annually

2. An officer must be in place to take and address safety complaints.

3. All mines that produce over 1 ton of product per year must be inspected and certified by The Bureau of Mining Safety.

4. All "mines" must turn in all accident reports to The bureau of mining safety every 6 months or 182 days.

To enforce these codes Creates and funds the The bureau of mining safety. To regulate the enforcement of all regulations. Make loans and grants to update safety in mines and to collaborate with local governments for the enforcement of these regulations.

Category: Safety Strength: Mild Proposed by:Ulil
Understanding:Mining can be a major source of economic income in a industrialized nations.
Seeing:That Mining would employ many individuals whose safety is on the line in working and operating in the removal of resources. That safety would need to be a more regulated in this dangerous practice.
Defining: A "mine" as a a facility or operation taking place in the removal of natural resources
Therefore: Seeing that these practices need more oversight. Creates codes for a "mine" to follow.

1. A mine must update all the safety equipment every 4 years or 1,460 days.
2. A officer must be in place to take safety complaints and address them.
3. All "mines" that have made over 1 ton of product must be certified by a World AssemblyThe bureau of mining safety Mine safety inspector.
4. All "mines" must turn in all accident reports to The bureau of mining safety every 6 months or 182 days.

To enforce these codes Creates and funds the The bureau of mining safety. To regulate the enforcement of all regulations. Make loans and grants to update safety in mines and to collaborate with local governments for the enforcement of these regulations.

[Ulil]

This discussion thread is for my new draft called on On mining safety. This is a place for constructive criticism. Not for hating. Just tell me how I can make it better.

[Ulil]

I have Just put up the On mining safety discussion thread please check it out!

[Mordakia]

Some of your definitions are not strictly true.

[Ulil]

Some of your definitions are not strictly true.

Like?

[Normlpeople]

We dont need two discussion threads. Debate it on the main thread where the draft is posted.

[Separatist Peoples]

OOC: hopefully a mod will come by and merge your two threads. One proposal, one thread. Do yourself a favor and read through the Rules and General Advice sticky at the top of the forum? It may help.

IC: "Your draft does indeed have outright fallacies. This, for example:

Defining: A "mine" as a a facility or operation taking place in the removal of natural resources

"This definition includes mines. It also includes logging sites, wells, and farmland. I suggest you take some time to get experience debating other proposals, so you can learn the ropes. Then, only after you've spent a few weeks or months getting experience, should you try authoring something."

[Wrapper]

Sent up a flare to merge.

[Ulil]

OOC: hopefully a mod will come by and merge your two threads. One proposal, one thread. Do yourself a favor and read through the Rules and General Advice sticky at the top of the forum? It may help.

IC: "Your draft does indeed have outright fallacies. This, for example:

Defining: A "mine" as a a facility or operation taking place in the removal of natural resources

"This definition includes mines. It also includes logging sites, wells, and farmland. I suggest you take some time to get experience debating other proposals, so you can learn the ropes. Then, only after you've spent a few weeks or months getting experience, should you try authoring something."

That makes sense. I would agree the definitions are to broad. Would this be better

Defining: A "mine" as a underground facility or operation taking place in the removal of natural resources

[Mundiferrum]

OOC: hopefully a mod will come by and merge your two threads. One proposal, one thread. Do yourself a favor and read through the Rules and General Advice sticky at the top of the forum? It may help.

IC: "Your draft does indeed have outright fallacies. This, for example:

"This definition includes mines. It also includes logging sites, wells, and farmland. I suggest you take some time to get experience debating other proposals, so you can learn the ropes. Then, only after you've spent a few weeks or months getting experience, should you try authoring something."

That makes sense. I would agree the definitions are to broad. Would this be better

Defining: A "mine" as a underground facility or operation taking place in the removal of natural resources

That would include mushroom farms, certain water wells, regular farms built underground....

[Ulil]

That makes sense. I would agree the definitions are to broad. Would this be better

That would include mushroom farms, certain water wells, regular farms built underground....

What would you suggest

[Mundiferrum]

Something along the lines of this:
(OOC: From Wikipedia) "Mining is the extraction of valuable minerals or other geological materials from the earth from an orebody, lode, vein, seam, or reef, which forms the mineralized package of economic interest to the miner."
ie, not necessarily underground, not just "natural resources"; perhaps 'a facility wherein the extraction of geological materials from the earth occurs', or something close to that.

[Wrapper]

Need to take into account the Future Techies too -- you can mine materials from an asteroid, for example, and not just the earth.

Is it really necessary to define the word "mine"?

[Ulil]

Need to take into account the Future Techies too -- you can mine materials from an asteroid, for example, and not just the earth.

Is it really necessary to define the word "mine"?

True what should I change it two

[Mundiferrum]

Need to take into account the Future Techies too -- you can mine materials from an asteroid, for example, and not just the earth.

Is it really necessary to define the word "mine"?

Well, certain stupid legislatures might understand mining as the process of laying bombs under the ground....but yes, I think it'd be much better to just do away with a definition.

EDIT: Also, "four years" and "one ton of product" are fairly arbitrary values, the language is terrible, and are WA organizations allowed to loan money like that?

[Ulil]

Something along the lines of this:
(OOC: From Wikipedia) "Mining is the extraction of valuable minerals or other geological materials from the earth from an orebody, lode, vein, seam, or reef, which forms the mineralized package of economic interest to the miner."
ie, not necessarily underground, not just "natural resources"; perhaps 'a facility wherein the extraction of geological materials from the earth occurs', or something close to that.

Like it!

[Ulil]

Got to go

[Normlpeople]

Just a heads up.. a copy/paste from Wikipedia is a great way to get nailed with plagiarism
That gets you kicked out of the WA completely. Play with the definition and word it differently

[Araraukar]

OOC: Also, for the love of whatever paranormal entity you prefer, take off the "center" code - it makes my brain hurt to try and read it.

[Chester Pearson]

Safety is a category now?

[Ulil]

Im gonna start working on a second draft

[District XIV]

OOC: Can the [align=center] tags be removed for the actual body of the resolution? Please...?

Edit: Also, space out the lines, please.

[Ulil]

OOC: Can the [align=center] tags be removed for the actual body of the resolution? Please...?

Edit: Also, space out the lines, please.

What?

[Defwa]

OOC: Can the [align=center] tags be removed for the actual body of the resolution? Please...?

Edit: Also, space out the lines, please.

What?

Your draft is aligned to the center and clumped together.
Putting spaces between clauses makes things easier to read. As does left aligning it.

Look at previously passed resolutions for stylistic help

[Ulil]

What?

Your draft is aligned to the center and clumped together.
Putting spaces between clauses makes things easier to read. As does left aligning it.

Look at previously passed resolutions for stylistic help

OK!