by Norfsex » Sat Mar 19, 2011 8:42 pm
by Scientific socks » Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:04 pm
by TheKanadian Federation » Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:06 pm
Scientific socks wrote:Normally the first post is more than one line. Care to elaborate
by Sarrowquand » Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:13 pm
by Norfsex » Sat Mar 19, 2011 11:07 pm
Sarrowquand wrote:I'm not sure that AV will change how Britain's political parties operate. Maybe it will though?
I like how the European elections are done and I'd like to see that applied to the national : Maybe there are some good reasons not to have that though, maybe not.
I think that ditching first past the post is only useful if it changes how politicians and political parties operate, maybe that would inject some optimism into the electorate/population.
by Forsakia » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:56 am
Norfsex wrote:Sarrowquand wrote:I'm not sure that AV will change how Britain's political parties operate. Maybe it will though?
I like how the European elections are done and I'd like to see that applied to the national : Maybe there are some good reasons not to have that though, maybe not.
I think that ditching first past the post is only useful if it changes how politicians and political parties operate, maybe that would inject some optimism into the electorate/population.
Well, I still think that a Two Party system is infinitely better than a multiple party system that the Alternative Vote System may encourage- it is far better to have to moderate parties that are able to follow through with the promises of their manifesto than to force them to create a coalition with the extreme of their ideology and force them to radicalize against the democratic will of the voters. In addition, I heard it said by several pundits, including Mr Cameron, that it is also unfair in that it allows voters of hopeless fringe parties to have a second vote in comparison with those who have voted for a mainstream party, which is unfair to the voters and undermining our core democratic principle: One man, one vote.
by St George of England » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:30 am
by Rolamec » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:32 am
by Rouge Pioneers » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:33 am
by Christmahanikwanzikah » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:35 am
Norfsex wrote:Being an American, I really can't how can anyone want to abandon the First Past the Post System.
by The Blood of 999 Goats » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:37 am
Rolamec wrote:I have no idea what this means and in my American ignorance, I'll place a special emphasis on the word "alternative" connect it with "lifestyles" and assume this is about queers. Realizing this is the UK we are talking about, my logic is therefore undeniable.
by Whiskey Hill » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:46 am
Norfsex wrote:Sarrowquand wrote:I'm not sure that AV will change how Britain's political parties operate. Maybe it will though?
I like how the European elections are done and I'd like to see that applied to the national : Maybe there are some good reasons not to have that though, maybe not.
I think that ditching first past the post is only useful if it changes how politicians and political parties operate, maybe that would inject some optimism into the electorate/population.
Well, I still think that a Two Party system is infinitely better than a multiple party system that the Alternative Vote System may encourage- it is far better to have to moderate parties that are able to follow through with the promises of their manifesto than to force them to create a coalition with the extreme of their ideology and force them to radicalize against the democratic will of the voters. In addition, I heard it said by several pundits, including Mr Cameron, that it is also unfair in that it allows voters of hopeless fringe parties to have a second vote in comparison with those who have voted for a mainstream party, which is unfair to the voters and undermining our core democratic principle: One man, one vote.
by Republicke » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:58 am
Bramborska wrote:Muscular liberalism? He took my gay stripper name!
by Rolamec » Sun Mar 20, 2011 4:04 am
The Blood of 999 Goats wrote:Rolamec wrote:I have no idea what this means and in my American ignorance, I'll place a special emphasis on the word "alternative" connect it with "lifestyles" and assume this is about queers. Realizing this is the UK we are talking about, my logic is therefore undeniable.
I'd vote for you if you came to England
by Britcan » Sun Mar 20, 2011 4:07 am
by Forsakia » Sun Mar 20, 2011 4:10 am
Republicke wrote:Should follow the Scottish model, I'm not sure why AV is even being talked about tbh.
by Forsakia » Sun Mar 20, 2011 4:11 am
Whiskey Hill wrote:Norfsex wrote:
Well, I still think that a Two Party system is infinitely better than a multiple party system that the Alternative Vote System may encourage- it is far better to have to moderate parties that are able to follow through with the promises of their manifesto than to force them to create a coalition with the extreme of their ideology and force them to radicalize against the democratic will of the voters. In addition, I heard it said by several pundits, including Mr Cameron, that it is also unfair in that it allows voters of hopeless fringe parties to have a second vote in comparison with those who have voted for a mainstream party, which is unfair to the voters and undermining our core democratic principle: One man, one vote.
First past the post and single member districts also ensure that those "voters of hopeless fringe parties" never get to take part in real democracy, where their voice will be heard in government. Multiple party systems allow them to be heard sometimes, even if it is as minor partners in coalitions. Just because they aren't Democrats or Republicans, or Labour or Conservatives, doesn't mean they shouldn't have a say in the actual governing of the nation once in a while.
by Republicke » Sun Mar 20, 2011 4:12 am
Rolamec wrote:The Blood of 999 Goats wrote:I'd vote for you if you came to England
Look out England, London's getting a new PM. But before I become a Brit, I'll have to undergo the British treatment. First, I'll need to start drinking heavily, in order to cause serious damage to my liver. Second, I'll have to avoid the sun at all costs, fortunately enough I did pass a goth at my university, perhaps they could help and tell me how they look so creepy with their pasty complexion. Third, I need to get some crooked, ugly teeth. So bar fights, should do the trick. Fourth, I'll watch as many Sean Connery movies as humanly possible, realizing that yes his accent is Scottish, but I being an American do not realize there is a difference. Finally (and most important of all), I find an unattractive Englishwoman (easy, right? Like picking a needle out of a stack of needles), with crooked teeth, a horrible complexion, and an accent so heavy and thick I'll probably end up murdering her anyhow due to being annoyed shit crazy. Only then, can I become PM.
Bramborska wrote:Muscular liberalism? He took my gay stripper name!
by Republicke » Sun Mar 20, 2011 4:14 am
Bramborska wrote:Muscular liberalism? He took my gay stripper name!
by The Blood of 999 Goats » Sun Mar 20, 2011 4:14 am
Rolamec wrote:The Blood of 999 Goats wrote:I'd vote for you if you came to England
Look out England, London's getting a new PM. But before I become a Brit, I'll have to undergo the British treatment. First, I'll need to start drinking heavily, in order to cause serious damage to my liver. Second, I'll have to avoid the sun at all costs, fortunately enough I did pass a goth at my university, perhaps they could help and tell me how they look so creepy with their pasty complexion. Third, I need to get some crooked, ugly teeth. So bar fights, should do the trick. Fourth, I'll watch as many Sean Connery movies as humanly possible, realizing that yes his accent is Scottish, but I being an American do not realize there is a difference. Finally (and most important of all), I find an unattractive Englishwoman (easy, right? Like picking a needle out of a stack of needles), with crooked teeth, a horrible complexion, and an accent so heavy and thick I'll probably end up murdering her anyhow due to being annoyed shit crazy. Only then, can I become PM.
by Rolamec » Sun Mar 20, 2011 4:18 am
The Blood of 999 Goats wrote:Rolamec wrote:
Look out England, London's getting a new PM. But before I become a Brit, I'll have to undergo the British treatment. First, I'll need to start drinking heavily, in order to cause serious damage to my liver. Second, I'll have to avoid the sun at all costs, fortunately enough I did pass a goth at my university, perhaps they could help and tell me how they look so creepy with their pasty complexion. Third, I need to get some crooked, ugly teeth. So bar fights, should do the trick. Fourth, I'll watch as many Sean Connery movies as humanly possible, realizing that yes his accent is Scottish, but I being an American do not realize there is a difference. Finally (and most important of all), I find an unattractive Englishwoman (easy, right? Like picking a needle out of a stack of needles), with crooked teeth, a horrible complexion, and an accent so heavy and thick I'll probably end up murdering her anyhow due to being annoyed shit crazy. Only then, can I become PM.
To paraphrase the quote in your signature: Being English is easy; It's easier if you're ugly
by The Matthew Islands » Sun Mar 20, 2011 4:18 am
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1
by The Blood of 999 Goats » Sun Mar 20, 2011 4:20 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, 0rganization, Dumb Ideologies, Floofybit, Hurdergaryp, Ifreann, Pale Dawn, Poliski, Rutheria
Advertisement