United Federation of Canada wrote:Could NE please hurry up and refound their region so this issue can finally DIE once and for all?
Which it will be ready when it's ready.
Advertisement
by Captain Woodhouse » Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:04 pm
United Federation of Canada wrote:Could NE please hurry up and refound their region so this issue can finally DIE once and for all?
by Unibot III » Wed Dec 19, 2012 9:28 pm
Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:If you were to read the recent Liberate NE proposals that have been floating around here (there have been - what? - four or so in the past two months) you would realize that Liberating the region will open Nazi Europe up to invasion and will ultimately (I believe) lead to the destruction of the region by outside forces. A lot of people don't even like the fact that the region exists. You are better off with the password, despite the internal politics of the region that may be in play here as well.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by United Federation of Canada » Wed Dec 19, 2012 9:46 pm
Unibot III wrote:Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:If you were to read the recent Liberate NE proposals that have been floating around here (there have been - what? - four or so in the past two months) you would realize that Liberating the region will open Nazi Europe up to invasion and will ultimately (I believe) lead to the destruction of the region by outside forces. A lot of people don't even like the fact that the region exists. You are better off with the password, despite the internal politics of the region that may be in play here as well.
I agree with Skyrim and won't count this draft as having the necessary "native support" when most of executives and long-term members want the password up and for good reason. This would set a bad precedent for other regions.
by Rupture Farms co » Thu Dec 20, 2012 12:06 am
by Cromarty » Thu Dec 20, 2012 12:37 am
United Federation of Canada wrote:Unibot III wrote:
I agree with Skyrim and won't count this draft as having the necessary "native support" when most of executives and long-term members want the password up and for good reason. This would set a bad precedent for other regions.
Plus it has been tried 4 times and the majority of the international community has been against it everytime.
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
by Cormac Stark » Thu Dec 20, 2012 1:42 am
by United Federation of Canada » Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:48 am
Cormac Stark wrote:I'm unsurprisingly in favor of this resolution.
To be clear, I couldn't care less that the natives of NAZI EUROPE are upset that the leadership of a Nazi region in which they chose to reside is behaving in a totalitarian way. Is that really a shock? Nevertheless, this resolution -- whatever its reasoning -- would accomplish what I have been trying to accomplish for months: It would open NAZI EUROPE to invasion, thus ensuring that its natives cannot be a threat to other regions because they will be preoccupied with defense of their own.
If NAZI EUROPE isn't liberated, and soon, the native government will refound the region. Once the region again has a founder its WA nations will no longer be preoccupied with regional defense. This will allow them to resume the raiding and griefing for which NAZI EUROPE is historically known. It is not in the interests of founderless natives, of neutral regions, of defenders or of the many invaders who find NAZI EUROPE detestable for this to happen. There is not a region or individual in the NationStates world other than NAZI EUROPE and its allies who should oppose opening NAZI EUROPE to invasion. The insidious nature of the Nazi ideology goes beyond this game and we should decisively declare by passing this resolution that we will do everything in our power to oppose within this game identification with and glorification of an ideology that led to the murder of millions.
I will close by saying that I speak for no region or organization on this matter. My views here are my own but I will stand by them and continue insisting until the moment it is either liberated or refounded that the NationStates community should act against NAZI EUROPE through the Security Council.
by Cromarty » Thu Dec 20, 2012 3:00 am
Nazi Europe already set the precedent.United Federation of Canada wrote:If we liberate for the purpose of an invasion, it sets a terrible precedent that we for one do not wish to be part of.
So wrongs are ok as long as they were committed a 'long' time ago?Force is not required as Nazi Europe has done nothing wrong as of late, and we will have no party to destroying a region because of it's name.
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
by United Federation of Canada » Thu Dec 20, 2012 3:29 am
Nazi Europe already set the precedent.
So wrongs are ok as long as they were committed a 'long' time ago?
by Cromarty » Thu Dec 20, 2012 3:56 am
United Federation of Canada wrote:Nazi Europe already set the precedent.
Were they successful? If not, then no precedent has been set.
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
by United Federation of Canada » Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:08 am
by Bears Armed Mission » Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:47 am
Three Weasels wrote:Judging by the length their delegate has held office, we'd wager the password is a security implementation. To remove the password would be a violation of their sovereign rights in this case. Only once in our delegacy have we approved a liberation, and it was for a region that had its sovereignty brutally violated. We see no evidence to suggest that this is the case here.
by Imperium of Tanith » Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:18 am
United Federation of Canada wrote:Fair enough. But did Nazi Europe destroy that region? No they did not.
If Nazi Europe is opened to invasion, it WILL BE destroyed, just because of it's name, and that is an even bigger wrong than Nazi Europe committed.
We still contend that Nazi Europe has the right to exist, even if we abhor their despicable policies, and there has been no argument that has changed that stance as of yet.
by Unibot III » Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:14 pm
Cromarty wrote:United Federation of Canada wrote:
Plus it has been tried 4 times and the majority of the international community has been against it everytime.
Unfortunately.
Opening up Nazi Europe to an invasion with a liberation would be delightful irony, considering they tried exactly the same thing to Haven.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Marxist kingdoms » Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:21 pm
by Svarttjern » Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:58 am
by Cerian Quilor » Fri Dec 21, 2012 9:47 am
by National Socializtiche » Tue Dec 25, 2012 11:24 am
Cerian Quilor wrote:If NE was refounded, their WA nations would be able to raid with GGR or just found 'New Nazi Europe' or 'Nazi Europe II' or whatever the heck they want to call it, and then raid anyway.
While I personally don't like Nazi regions and would never work with them, I really don't care if they raid. They're one more raider group. This is a game, and getting obsessive about people who want to play Nazis is really not worthy my time. How many of them are actually IRL Nazis? (This is my issue with Antifa. Especially their santimoniousness and the whole thing in their WFE about how they're honoring all the people who have died fighing RL Facism, or some BS like that. Raiding and refounding Facist/Racist/Nationalist/Nazi regions does nothing to honor RL deaths) I mean, I've played Germany in Axis and Allies (in both the board game and the Computer game) and in a Civ III mod for WWII (and one for Civ IV). Does that mean I'm a nazi and need to be destroyed? A Few years ago, I played an SS officer in a game of GURPS (its a Roleplaying System) that had come from an alternate future where the Nazis won (and was thus trying to stop Allied time travelers from preventing his future from not happening). It was an interesting character to roleplay, for all I disagreed with everything Nazis stood for. Am I a Nazi now?
And why is it Nazi's get 'special treatment'? I mean, really? The Soviet Union killed more people all told, but communist/USSR themed regions don't get anything resembling the treatment of Nazi Regions.
Now, yes, I'm a bit hypocritical, since I would be far more willing to work with a communist/USSR themed region than a Nazi one (which I'd never work with), but there is a point where this Nazi-hating goes into the ridiculous, in the context of this game.
by Potlimitomaha » Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:47 pm
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:Very, very much in favour.
by National Socialists of America » Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:51 pm
Oh really? Which "oil" nation has America invaded and conquered lately? You must mean America, which will overtake the Middle East as the world's largest energy producer in 5 years. That America will invade countries?
Pathetic how people actually start to believe their own mindless BS.
by Anime Daisuki » Tue Dec 25, 2012 6:44 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Federation of Hotel, Uberio
Advertisement