by Hulunbuir » Wed Aug 17, 2016 10:02 am
by Umeria » Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:37 am
Hulunbuir wrote:excludes persons in all member states of the world community
by Separatist Peoples » Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:40 am
by Hannasea » Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:46 am
by Hulunbuir » Wed Aug 17, 2016 3:43 pm
Hannasea wrote:OOC: Can you explain how this proposal would intersect with the "Intergender" provisions of A Convention on Gender?
by Hannasea » Wed Aug 17, 2016 3:48 pm
Hulunbuir wrote:Hannasea wrote:OOC: Can you explain how this proposal would intersect with the "Intergender" provisions of A Convention on Gender?
First of all, thank you all very much for your suggestions. I am new to the game and was unaware of the protocol. I very much appreciate your help to make this proposal better.
Also, I did not know how to find past legislation regarding a similar subject, so I apologize for being unaware of the document you mention here.
Finally, could you please explain to me an example of how to go about doing this? ("This" being the quote.)
by Hulunbuir » Wed Aug 17, 2016 9:38 pm
Hannasea wrote:Hulunbuir wrote:
First of all, thank you all very much for your suggestions. I am new to the game and was unaware of the protocol. I very much appreciate your help to make this proposal better.
Also, I did not know how to find past legislation regarding a similar subject, so I apologize for being unaware of the document you mention here.
Finally, could you please explain to me an example of how to go about doing this? ("This" being the quote.)
OOC: No problem.
Sadly, it's not super-easy to find legislation by subject. They are listed here, but the thread spans multiple pages. You can also use the index by category and look up, say, all of the current "Human Rights" proposals.
by Tinfect » Wed Aug 17, 2016 9:48 pm
Hulunbuir wrote:I'm sorry, my last comment was unclear. Could you please explain to me how to intersect with that other document?
Imperium Central News Network: EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL CITIZENS ARE TO PROCEED TO EVACUATION SITES IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: ALL FURTHER SUBSPACE SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS ARE TO BE DISABLED IMMEDIATELY | EMERGENCY ALERT: THE FOLLOWING SYSTEMS ARE ACCESS PROHIBITED BY STANDARD/BLACKOUT [Error: Format Unrecognized] | Indomitable Bastard #283
by Hannasea » Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:29 am
by Taboa » Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:49 am
Hannasea wrote:OOC: I think the gender fluid provisions of this proposal are probably already covered by the "intergender" provisions of A Convention On Gender. So you may be best off concentrating on the education aspect, because Reproductive Education Act doesn't seem to go into this in great detail and there may be room for expansion on the topic without "duplication".
by Araraukar » Thu Aug 18, 2016 12:44 pm
Taboa wrote:however education refer to everyone.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Araraukar » Fri Aug 19, 2016 2:13 am
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Alozia » Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:41 am
(Ironic; me when I see Gord)Gordano and Lysandus wrote:I swear you are the LOTF Mariah sometimes
Peoples shara wrote: "Die nasty!!111"
by The Sheika » Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:49 am
Alozia wrote:"'gender neutral', 'genderqueer' and 'non-binary'? C'mon lads we are not going to actually legitimise those things are we?" says Charles Tetor
by Alozia » Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:59 am
(Ironic; me when I see Gord)Gordano and Lysandus wrote:I swear you are the LOTF Mariah sometimes
Peoples shara wrote: "Die nasty!!111"
by The Sheika » Mon Aug 22, 2016 12:12 pm
Alozia wrote:The Sheika wrote:
Clearing his throat, Colonel Austin comes to his feet; "Let's say we are; then what? Is it really such a terrible thing?"
"Most of people identifying with any of those "genders" are teens or people in their early twenties. Most of those people haven't got a job and we really are harming them than helping. Accepting those things definetly shouldn't be mandatory on governmental - or for that matter - international level"
by Alozia » Mon Aug 22, 2016 12:17 pm
The Sheika wrote:Alozia wrote:
"Most of people identifying with any of those "genders" are teens or people in their early twenties. Most of those people haven't got a job and we really are harming them than helping. Accepting those things definetly shouldn't be mandatory on governmental - or for that matter - international level"
"Do you have sufficient data to support that claim? I ask because I know quite a few individuals who are not in their teens or early twenties, who also happen to have stable employment that fall under the aforementioned terms of 'gender neutral', genderqueer', and 'non-binary'. Although if you have data which has been verified, then by all means please share that with the rest of the Assembly."
(Ironic; me when I see Gord)Gordano and Lysandus wrote:I swear you are the LOTF Mariah sometimes
Peoples shara wrote: "Die nasty!!111"
by The Sheika » Mon Aug 22, 2016 12:26 pm
Alozia wrote:" 'fall under' doesn't necessarily mean they identify them as such. If they do then I apologise, but still it should not be mandatory to accept this."
by Calladan » Mon Aug 22, 2016 1:33 pm
The Sheika wrote:Alozia wrote:" 'fall under' doesn't necessarily mean they identify them as such. If they do then I apologise, but still it should not be mandatory to accept this."
Colonel Austin nods "Oh, they do indeed identify themselves as such, but that is not the point I was going for. I am merely interested in the information you had mentioned to support your point. If such data exists it may help you expand upon why you stand against this."
by Wallenburg » Mon Aug 22, 2016 1:39 pm
by The Sheika » Mon Aug 22, 2016 1:57 pm
Wallenburg wrote:"Absolutely opposed, Ambassador. Really, we already have enough of this legislation. We don't need any more to legitimize..." Ogenbond stops, looks at the other ambassadors, and continues. "To legitimize total duplication of World Assembly legislation."
by Alozia » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:36 pm
(Ironic; me when I see Gord)Gordano and Lysandus wrote:I swear you are the LOTF Mariah sometimes
Peoples shara wrote: "Die nasty!!111"
by States of Glory WA Office » Mon Aug 22, 2016 6:12 pm
Alozia wrote:The Sheika wrote:
"Do you have sufficient data to support that claim? I ask because I know quite a few individuals who are not in their teens or early twenties, who also happen to have stable employment that fall under the aforementioned terms of 'gender neutral', genderqueer', and 'non-binary'. Although if you have data which has been verified, then by all means please share that with the rest of the Assembly."
" 'fall under' doesn't necessarily mean they identify them as such. If they do then I apologise, but still it should not be mandatory to accept this."
by The Sheika » Mon Aug 22, 2016 7:41 pm
Alozia wrote:"I think that I made it clear that I'm opposed. Now If you wouldn't mind gentlemen/ladies/assault helicopters I will go and drink some FreedomTea" *Charles Tetor leaves*
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bupkiss
Advertisement