-Ebola- wrote:Why are you making drugs to fight viruses in the first place? We shouldn't be giving out money to help governments develop antiviral drugs. That's like paying people to commit genocide.
We agree!!
Advertisement
by Infectious Microorganisms » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:20 am
-Ebola- wrote:Why are you making drugs to fight viruses in the first place? We shouldn't be giving out money to help governments develop antiviral drugs. That's like paying people to commit genocide.
by Wrapper » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:46 am
Rapallo wrote:Wrapper wrote:Actually no, that URGES clause means nations can ignore the recommendations of the committee. They will be URGED, but they won't be required to actually ban anything.
Actually with the language in the proposal as it is. The committee it creates is tasked with creating guidelines that outlaw any medicine with "bad side effects"
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:35 am
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by The Dark Star Republic » Wed Oct 29, 2014 6:10 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Wed Oct 29, 2014 6:45 am
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
Users browsing this forum: Lotoslovalkia
Advertisement