Advertisement
by The Dark Star Republic » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:52 am
by Louisistan » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:53 am
The Dark Star Republic wrote:"Your definition of 'professional farmer' seems to be overlooking subsistence farmers, for whom this crop restriction pattern would not be viable.
"Also, what's an acre?"
~ Vice-Colonel Truculent Bilgewater
Ambassador to the WA
by Bears Armed » Mon Aug 18, 2014 10:28 am
by Wrapper » Mon Aug 18, 2014 10:36 am
The Dark Star Republic wrote:"Your definition of 'professional farmer' seems to be overlooking subsistence farmers, for whom this crop restriction pattern would not be viable.
"Also, what's an acre?"
~ Vice-Colonel Truculent Bilgewater
Ambassador to the WA
by Luxembourgers » Mon Aug 18, 2014 10:54 am
Louisistan wrote:Luxembourgers wrote:Believing the above proposal is as ready for submission as it will ever be, I hereby submit this proposal and request your approval.
Yeah no, that's not how it works. Drafting a resolution is a marathon, not a sprint. if you submit your current version you will undoubtedly fall short of quorum.
by Separatist Peoples » Mon Aug 18, 2014 10:59 am
Luxembourgers wrote:Challenge accepted!
by Luxembourgers » Mon Aug 18, 2014 11:04 am
Separatist Peoples wrote:Luxembourgers wrote:Challenge accepted!
"Ah, you aren't actually interested in drafting an effective proposal. That makes this much easier, ambassador."
"I must repeat my suggestion that you withdraw this and continue drafting, ambassador," pleaded Bell. "This, surprisingly, has a kernel of potential in it."
by Wrapper » Mon Aug 18, 2014 11:08 am
Luxembourgers wrote:Separatist Peoples wrote:"Ah, you aren't actually interested in drafting an effective proposal. That makes this much easier, ambassador."
"I must repeat my suggestion that you withdraw this and continue drafting, ambassador," pleaded Bell. "This, surprisingly, has a kernel of potential in it."
Of course I am interested in drafting an effective proposal! Maybe you don't like it, but after 1 hour, I already have 1/6 of the approvals I need, so apparently some people do.
by Separatist Peoples » Mon Aug 18, 2014 11:23 am
Luxembourgers wrote:Of course I am interested in drafting an effective proposal! Maybe you don't like it, but after 1 hour, I already have 1/6 of the approvals I need, so apparently some people do.
by Chester Pearson » Mon Aug 18, 2014 11:32 am
Separatist Peoples wrote:Luxembourgers wrote:Of course I am interested in drafting an effective proposal! Maybe you don't like it, but after 1 hour, I already have 1/6 of the approvals I need, so apparently some people do.
"If you had spent any time here at all learning the ins and outs of the Festering Snakepit, you'd know that literally any draft can make it as far as halfway to quorum. There are delegates, generally called Rubber Stampers, who approve anything, legal or not. This will not make it to quorum, ambassador, do not kid yourself."
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by Separatist Peoples » Mon Aug 18, 2014 11:38 am
Chester Pearson wrote:
That depend Ambassador Bell....
Someone may just take the time to campaign this to vote, and then watch the NatSov's smash it to smitherneens and urinate on the remains.
Just saying....
by Chester Pearson » Mon Aug 18, 2014 11:40 am
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by Louisistan » Mon Aug 18, 2014 11:42 am
by Lexicor » Mon Aug 18, 2014 11:46 am
by Wrapper » Mon Aug 18, 2014 11:47 am
Lexicor wrote:Something was mentioned about urination on remains? Someone should be arrested for this transgressioN!
by Louisistan » Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:06 pm
by Potted Plants United » Mon Aug 18, 2014 1:46 pm
Luxembourgers wrote:Fertile Farmland Protection Act
NOTING that most -- if not all -- WA States rely heavily on professional farmers to grow crops through agricultural means
and deeming it necessary for agriculture to remain intact having realized the benefits to the farmers, the economy, and international trade, but
REALIZING that when the same crop is planted in the same field too frequently, it rapidly depletes necessary nutrients from the soil, causing the soil to become infertile and unable to continue to produce enough crops to benefit anyone,
RELUCTANTLY AWARE that whenever a fertile field is destroyed by any means, a portion of similarly sized area of forest must be deforested in order to replace that field,
BELIEVING it is necessary for fertile farmland to be protected, this resolution hereby:
BELIEVING it is necessary for fertile farmland to be protected,and start the whole proposal, before all the BELIEVING and such, with "The World Assembly".
Hereby,
DEFINES a "professional farmer" as a person who is a farmer, planter, or gardener by profession, and farms at least one acre of farmland,
RESTRICTS professional farmers from planting the same crop in the same field in back-to-back growing seasons so that fertile farmland might be preserved,
ADVISES professional farmers to alternate crops so that a perfectly good field does not go unused,
ESTABLISHES the World Assembly Agricultural Association (WAAA) to oversee a agricultural communities and enforce the given guidelines, and
STRONGLY ENCOURAGES the World Assembly Forest Commission to consider creating restrictions on the number of acres that can be deforested for agricultural purposes in a given area.
Separatist Peoples wrote:"NOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPE!"
- Mr. Bell, when introduced to PPU's newest moving plant
by Grays Harbor » Mon Aug 18, 2014 3:42 pm
by Normlpeople » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:32 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Submitted after One Whole Day of debate. How quaint.
by Chester Pearson » Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:56 pm
Normlpeople wrote:Grays Harbor wrote:Submitted after One Whole Day of debate. How quaint.
OOC Along with the bad idea = submit immediately. The rubber stamp brigade and the environment is good man crowd has already weighed in, though I expect it to be destroyed at vote should it get that far. At least it has glaring loopholes making "compliance" easy.
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by Araraukar » Tue Aug 19, 2014 8:08 am
Chester Pearson wrote:The Newbies don't want to listen, and send their shit to the floor after a day? That's fine. I will do what I can to bring it to vote, so it can be desecrated on the floor
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Elke and Elba » Tue Aug 19, 2014 8:10 am
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.
by The Eternal Kawaii » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:26 pm
Luxembourgers wrote:2. RESTRICTS professional farmers from planting the same crop in the same field in back-to-back growing seasons so that fertile farmland might be preserved,
by Wrapper » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:35 pm
by The Dark Star Republic » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:36 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement