Jarish Inyo wrote:And maybe it has been declared illegal because no one has sent a flag up.
[OOC: I don't think it's illegal. I've asked questions about it in the GA Q&A Thread, a lot of people have been in this thread and haven't raised legal objections to anything that made it into in the submitted draft and Mousebumples dropped in when this process started (and would have probably raised something then).
Thanks for reminding me.
That's totally unnecessary. Look, I would like to pass this resolution eventually, which is why I'm here trying to improve it. If the current iteration is illegal (we already know it has some grammatical failings) then please tell me exactly what isn't allowed so I can modify it. I still don't understand what your specific legal objections are - if there are legal problems with this resolution, please tell me precisely what they are so I can try to rectify them.
other then the forced registrations
'Forced registrations': NS has no international aircraft registry and you simply can't say that every human nation in the WA Assembly has a fully functional registry system. Cross-registration nationally and internationally aids data accessibility and prevents data loss in flooding/document destruction/fire/etc.
Let's try something. Please point out something in your proposal, other then the forced registrations, that is not covered by GAR#34.
1. Establising specific mational bodies tasked with carry out air crash investigations (GAR#34 mentions that the ITSC should merely devise regulations on this issue).
2. Introduces a number of specific and exact requirements for aircraft to comply with (i.e levels of airworthiness, documentation on airframe and engine units, manufacturer's manuals) as opposed to 'conform[ing] to ITSC standards'.
3. Details piloting training levels and so forth instead of simply declaring that they should meet a standard to be set by the ITSC.
4. Vests power with sovereign, independent and accountable bodies in each nation instead of with a single international committee (the IARB exists to oversee, enforce and support).
5. The resolution also advances GAR#34's transport-wide provisions for the aircraft industry. I have no quarrel with GAR#34 but it was aimed transport as a whole whereas this proposal is aimed specifically at aviation.]