[ABANDONED]Access to Sea Ports

[Rotwood]

4.The power to turn away ships remains with the nation's government. Member nations are allowed to turn away whoever they want and whenever they want for any reason.

Cognizant that the provisions of this resolution do apply to all member nation's sea ports.

Hereby granting, all member nations access to sea ports.

Felica looks over this part
"So... This resolution effectively does nothing?"

[Defwa]

4.The power to turn away ships remains with the nation's government. Member nations are allowed to turn away whoever they want and whenever they want for any reason.

Cognizant that the provisions of this resolution do apply to all member nation's sea ports.

Hereby granting, all member nations access to sea ports.

Felica looks over this part
"So... This resolution effectively does nothing?"

Indeed. As much as Nooky (new nickname) talks about wishing to improve, we haven't been able to properly address that significant and probably most important flaw.

[The United Federation of Galaxies]

I don't think this proposal doesn't do enough to warrant a vote on the floor. As I understand it, without this resolution, free trade can happen anyways.

[Nucoclan]

I don't think this proposal doesn't do enough to warrant a vote on the floor. As I understand it, without this resolution, free trade can happen anyways.

So you're telling me that I wrote this for nothing?
Outrageous!

[Separatist Peoples]

I don't think this proposal doesn't do enough to warrant a vote on the floor. As I understand it, without this resolution, free trade can happen anyways.

So you're telling me that I wrote this for nothing?
Outrageous!

"It does appear that way..."

[Chester Pearson]

So you're telling me that I wrote this for nothing?

Several pages back....

[Wrapper]

I don't think this proposal doesn't do enough to warrant a vote on the floor. As I understand it, without this resolution, free trade can happen anyways.

So you're telling me that I wrote this for nothing?
Outrageous!

Well, no, consider it a learning experience, Ambassador.

[Tea Party USA 2]

I don't think this proposal doesn't do enough to warrant a vote on the floor. As I understand it, without this resolution, free trade can happen anyways.

So you're telling me that I wrote this for nothing?
Outrageous!

Well we told you at the very beginning to drop this bill but you refused to listen.

[Kaalakiota Corporation]

Category:Free Trade
Strength:Mild

A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.

Aware that no international legislation currently governs member nations having access to sea ports.

Convinced that allowing member nations to have access to sea ports will ensure the stability and the advancement of shipping and other services. Thereby, improving international trade and commerce.

The World Assembly,

Mandates the articles below:

Article I

Section I Definitions

1. A sea port is a location on a coast or shore containing one or more harbors where ships can dock and transfer citizens or cargo to or from land.

2. Defines access as the permission or the right to enter, get near, or make use of the member nation's sea port.


Article II

Section 1 What access to sea ports will allow member nations;

1.Free trade with other member nations of choice.

2.More income for member nations.

3.Reduced barriers to allow free trade.

4.The power to turn away ships remains with the nation's government. Member nations are allowed to turn away whoever they want and whenever they want for any reason.

Cognizant that the provisions of this resolution do apply to all member nation's sea ports.

Hereby granting, all member nations access to sea ports.

"Ambassador, this proposal does 100% nothing. It "opens" sea ports up, but then gives the government the right to deny anybody. Opposed."

[Molerats]

not happening, we decide who enters our borders. If anyone decides to push his luck there will be war

[The Leningrad Union]

Is there even a purpose to this?

[Chester Pearson]

Please quit bumping this as it is dead....

Nuco please request a lock for this is you are not going to pursue it further?

[King Avalon]

I don't think this will or should go through. The WA shouldn't have control over our ports and well, the idea of it is quite frankly, stupid. Who would vote in favour of this?

[Chester Pearson]

I don't think this will or should go through. The WA shouldn't have control over our ports and well, the idea of it is quite frankly, stupid. Who would vote in favour of this?

Henceforth why this is dead. Now quit bumping it!