[SILLY] GA Joke Proposals Only

by **Tinfect** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:05 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:It is in red.

Oh.
It's in the quote.
Now I just feel stupid.

by **Outer Sparta** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 5:12 pm

Tinfect wrote:
Imperium Anglorum wrote:It is in red.

Oh.
It's in the quote.
Now I just feel stupid.

Whup, my bad. I guess when I was quoting it, it accidentally got into the resolution itself. Now I feel more stupid. :oops:

by **San Llera** » Tue Sep 01, 2015 8:41 pm

Commend 51% of WA Nations

Category: Commendation | Nominee: 51% of WA Nations| Proposed By: San Llera

RECOGNIZING that San Llera would like a badge,

NOTING that a proposal needs to have a majority of votes for to pass,

the World Asembly hereby commends 51% of all WA nations (preferably delegates)

(My first attempt at writing a proposal, joke or otherwise. This is technically an SC proposal, but I feel this is the best place for it. Also, sorry if this has been done before.)

by **Frustrated Franciscans** » Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:35 am

Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote::roll: Bears do not have arms. They have four legs.

As our national animal is the brown bear, I would strongly differ with you. Many sites generally mention the "shoulders" of the bear. While the bear does walk on all fours he can and does stand on both hind legs. Would you consider a crawling baby someone without arms?

by **Katalaysia** » Mon Sep 21, 2015 12:29 pm

Requirement to Arm Bears

DEFINING A bear as a tall mammal, which can be brown, black or white of the family Urasae.
UNDERSTANDING that bears are very accurate and deadly with their claws.
ALSO UNDERSTANDING that bear claws hurt less than a lot of conventional weapons.
SEEING that bears aren't particularly good at firing firearms, and so would be much less accurate with them than their claws.

REQUIRES all WA Nations to equip any known bears with firearms on any part of their body.
SUGGESTS all WA Nations to make a team devoted to finding bears and giving them armaments.
URGES all WA nations to not actually teach the non-sentient bears how to fire these weapons, for else they will get accurate with them and take over.
SUGGESTS WA nations to make stealing any forms of weaponry off living and dead bears illegal.

by **Bears Armed** » Tue Sep 22, 2015 10:26 am

Katalaysia wrote:Requirement to Arm Bears

DEFINING A bear as a tall mammal, which can be brown, black or white of the family Urasae.
UNDERSTANDING that bears are very accurate and deadly with their claws.
ALSO UNDERSTANDING that bear claws hurt less than a lot of conventional weapons.
SEEING that bears aren't particularly good at firing firearms, and so would be much less accurate with them than their claws.

REQUIRES all WA Nations to equip any known bears with firearms on any part of their body.
SUGGESTS all WA Nations to make a team devoted to finding bears and giving them armaments.
URGES all WA nations to not actually teach the non-sentient bears how to fire these weapons, for else they will get accurate with them and take over.
SUGGESTS WA nations to make stealing any forms of weaponry off living and dead bears illegal.

"Hrreally?"

by **The Pandarian Order** » Sun Sep 27, 2015 7:48 pm

Acknowledging that the moon has turned blood red and then disappeared,
Inferring that in order to get it back we have to give it blood,

The GA hereby declares that:
1. ALL WA states must sacrifice one(1) virgin, whose blood has to be smeared on a wheel of cheese (as we all know cheese is directly related to the moon)
2. The bloodied cheese must be placed in a pond (it is known that the moon always shows up in the pond, so placing the cheese is the reflection to be cast upon the sky, thus summoning the moon to return)
3. Failure is not tolerated. The moon must return!

OOC: This is a rare chance!

by **Wallenburg** » Sun Sep 27, 2015 7:58 pm

The Pandarian Order wrote:Acknowledging that the moon has turned blood red and then disappeared,
Inferring that in order to get it back we have to give it blood,

The GA hereby declares that:
1. ALL WA states must sacrifice one(1) virgin, whose blood has to be smeared on a wheel of cheese (as we all know cheese is directly related to the moon)
2. The bloodied cheese must be placed in a pond (it is known that the moon always shows up in the pond, so placing the cheese is the reflection to be cast upon the sky, thus summoning the moon to return)
3. Failure is not tolerated. The moon must return!

OOC: This is a rare chance!

More blood for the blood god!

by **Tinfect** » Sun Sep 27, 2015 7:59 pm

Wallenburg wrote:More blood for the blood god!

Blood for the Blood Moon!

by **Wallenburg** » Sun Sep 27, 2015 8:02 pm

Tinfect wrote:
Wallenburg wrote:More blood for the blood god!

Blood for the Blood Moon!

Blood begets blood. Infinite sacrifice!

by **Atomic Utopia** » Sun Sep 27, 2015 10:11 pm

Wallenburg wrote:
Tinfect wrote:
Blood for the Blood Moon!

Blood begets blood. Infinite sacrifice!

But that is illegal under WA law preventing genocide.

Repeal WA laws preventing genocide for Blood Moon! Blood for the Blood Moon, blood for... well just blood!

by **Atomic Utopia** » Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:52 pm

Tinfect inspired me with some interesting and new thoughts, so I decided I would write a totally serious proposal.

Tinfect wrote:
Petrolheadia wrote:
OOC: But in the past I also didn't give a damn about cars.

OOC:
That doesn't matter in the slightest.
If your only justification for this absolutely asinine attempt at legislation is that "cars are cool", then you have absolutely no business trying to pass WA Legislation.
You know what else is cool? Nuclear Bombs! How about we just mandate that all wars become Nuclear Wars!

Nuclear War Act

DEFINING Nuclear war as the use of nuclear weapons in warfare,
UNDERSTANDING that nuclear weapons are really quite cool,
ALSO UNDERSTANDING that nuclear weapons produce a wonderful glow upon detonation,
REGRETTING that nuclear war is relatively uncommon in WA states.

REQUIRES all WA Nations to use nuclear armaments in every civil or military conflict, police action, or war,
URGES use nuclear weapons whenever possible, especially when it is likely to cause more nuclear weapons use,
SUGGESTS WA nations to make the private ownership and open carry of nuclear weapons mandatory.

by **Malleabolus** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 1:40 am

Wallenburg wrote:More blood for the blood god!

MILK FOR THE KHORNE FLAKES!

by **Annihilators of Chan Island** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 1:46 am

Malleabolus wrote:
Wallenburg wrote:More blood for the blood god!

MILK FOR THE KHORNE FLAKES!

SKULLS FOR THE SKULL MOON!

by **Frustrated Franciscans** » Wed Sep 30, 2015 8:15 am

The Pandarian Order wrote:The GA hereby declares that:
1. ALL WA states must sacrifice one(1) virgin, whose blood has to be smeared on a wheel of cheese (as we all know cheese is directly related to the moon)
2. The bloodied cheese must be placed in a pond (it is known that the moon always shows up in the pond, so placing the cheese is the reflection to be cast upon the sky, thus summoning the moon to return)
3. Failure is not tolerated. The moon must return!

OOC: you know if you play around with the technical meanings of "sacrifice" and "virgin" ... this could be a diabolical pickup line at a bar. :twisted:

by **Central Asian Republics** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 5:39 am

Say No to Lemmings Act
Category: Common Sense | Strength: Theoretically weak to anyone with a bit of logic, but strong to everyone in the WA

Understanding that most WA Delegates are just lemmings.

Realising that those WA Delegates are approving absolutely horrifying WA proposals.

Requiring that WA Delegates must read all resolutions before approving.

Not really a parody, this should be real.

by **Bitely** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 5:49 am

Central Asian Republics wrote:
Say No to Lemmings Act
Category: Common Sense | Strength: Theoretically weak to anyone with a bit of logic, but strong to everyone in the WA

Understanding that most WA Delegates are just lemmings.

Realising that those WA Delegates are approving absolutely horrifying WA proposals.

Requiring that WA Delegates must read all resolutions before approving.

Not really a parody, this should be real.

"Not only would this be a horrifying resolution but also an illegal one" states Gregory

by **Adab** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 6:16 am

Trump for Secretary-General
Category: Donald | Strength: Trump

The World Assembly,

Recognizing the selfless service Donald John Trump has rendered to the world,

Commending Mr. Trump for his bravery and straightforwardness in conducting his life and business,

Further commending Mr. Trump for his strong leadership and interrogative abilities,

Admiring Mr. Trump for being open to and very interactive with the public,

Praising Mr. Trump for his honesty and humbleness,

Hereby installs Mr. Trump as Secretary-General of the World Assembly.

by **Ontorisa** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 6:18 am

Adab wrote:Snip

Too good

by **Wrapper** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 6:27 am

Adab wrote:
Trump for Secretary-General
Category: Donald | Strength: Trump

The World Assembly,

Recognizing the selfless service Donald John Trump has rendered to the world,

Commending Mr. Trump for his bravery and straightforwardness in conducting his life and business,

Further commending Mr. Trump for his strong leadership and interrogative abilities,

Admiring Mr. Trump for being open to and very interactive with the public,

Praising Mr. Trump for his honesty and humbleness,

Hereby installs Mr. Trump as Secretary-General of the World Assembly.

Oh I can hear it now. "China? I don't like China. They're horrible. Horrible. They invented global warming. UNICEF? I'll tell you what we'll do about UNICEF, we should build a wall, to keep those kids out of here...."

by **Central Asian Republics** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 7:35 am

Bitely wrote:"Not only would this be a horrifying resolution but also an illegal one" states Gregory

"[SILLY] GA Joke Proposals" and of course, you would obviously oppose it.

by **Kluvten** » Sun Oct 04, 2015 5:03 am

Central Asian Republics wrote:
Bitely wrote:"Not only would this be a horrifying resolution but also an illegal one" states Gregory

"[SILLY] GA Joke Proposals" and of course, you would obviously oppose it.

I'm not really going to pick sides in this whole clusterfuck around bitely, but there really should be a requirement for reading the resolution before voting.

by **Wadden-Amrum** » Mon Oct 05, 2015 1:49 am

Kluvten wrote:
Central Asian Republics wrote:"[SILLY] GA Joke Proposals" and of course, you would obviously oppose it.

I'm not really going to pick sides in this whole clusterfuck around bitely, but there really should be a requirement for reading the resolution before voting.

There actually is. "Read the Resolution" Act.

by **Frustrated Franciscans** » Mon Oct 05, 2015 12:15 pm

Wadden-Amrum wrote:There actually is. "Read the Resolution" Act.

Which, no one, apparently, has ever read. Even when its repeal was up for a vote a while ago. :twisted:

by **Adab** » Sat Oct 17, 2015 2:44 am

Yo Dude
Category: To be determined | Strength: To be determined

Yo dude,

We should make universal healthcare compulsory, dude.

We should ban war and nuclear weapons, dude.

We should protect freedom of speech, dude.

We should respect everyone's privacy, dude.

[SILLY] GA Joke Proposals Only

Mandatory Sacrifice for BLOOD MOON ECLIPSE

Who is online