Advertisement
by Jeruselem » Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:01 pm
by Neu Engollon » Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:10 pm
by New Montreal States » Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:08 pm
Falcus wrote:Can we please not start the 'waiting for a CoH invite' or 'why haven't I gotten an invite yet?' stuff? That's part of the reason why many members have been hesitant about bidding for the CoH. Just play nice.
by Gaveo » Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:32 pm
by Neu Engollon » Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:33 pm
by Saintland » Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:43 pm
Neu Engollon wrote:CoH related. If one were to re-post their WC roster in the Harmony Cup roster thread, with some slight alterations, would that be considered bad form?
by Cassadaigua » Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:49 pm
Neu Engollon wrote:CoH related. If one were to re-post their WC roster in the Harmony Cup roster thread, with some slight alterations, would that be considered bad form?
by The Sova Empire » Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:52 pm
by New Sideburn » Sun Jul 07, 2013 10:17 pm
by The Archregimancy » Sun Jul 07, 2013 11:02 pm
New Sideburn wrote:... I was so pumped to see the group 10 results I actually forgot about Brenecia altogether.
Though admittedly hoping the Archregimancy to drop points against an RP-less ninth seed at home was a bit optimistic.
by Jeruselem » Sun Jul 07, 2013 11:30 pm
by Starblaydia » Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:59 am
Jeruselem wrote:Say who have the longest consecutive participation run on this NSWC. I've been in every cup since 11 I think.
by Horusland » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:17 am
by Starblaydia » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:20 am
by Polar Islandstates » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:20 am
Felix wrote:Common Margret!
by New Sideburn » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:20 am
by Starblaydia » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:24 am
New Sideburn wrote:Given that the WCC is reformatting the algebraic formula of 300 different nations over the course of, like, six world cups, I'd give them a little more time than 'a few hours'.
by Boring Paradise » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:49 am
by New Sideburn » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:55 am
Starblaydia wrote:New Sideburn wrote:Given that the WCC is reformatting the algebraic formula of 300 different nations over the course of, like, six world cups, I'd give them a little more time than 'a few hours'.
I have no idea what this means, but I was still both impressed and amused. Kinda like an xkcd comic.
by Starblaydia » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:57 am
New Sideburn wrote:Starblaydia wrote:I have no idea what this means, but I was still both impressed and amused. Kinda like an xkcd comic.
Was in response to Horusland asking when the rankings would be updated; I would've quoted, but I was the next post in line at time of writing, and couldn't be bothered to insert the quote when it turned out two people had gone before me while I was writing.
by Horusland » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:59 am
New Sideburn wrote:Given that the WCC is reformatting the algebraic formula of 300 different nations over the course of, like, six world cups, I'd give them a little more time than 'a few hours'.
by Polar Islandstates » Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:03 am
Starblaydia wrote:New Sideburn wrote:Was in response to Horusland asking when the rankings would be updated; I would've quoted, but I was the next post in line at time of writing, and couldn't be bothered to insert the quote when it turned out two people had gone before me while I was writing.
Oh I understood the context, but 'the WCC is reformatting the algebraic formula of 300 different nations' struck me with a kind of scientific whimsy.
by Maklohi Vai » Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:06 am
by The Archregimancy » Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:29 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement