Izzyshipper wrote:"May I point out that the act has aleady passed, and any ammendments shall have to be proposed in an seperate bill and voted on.
As for the proposed compromise I must share the doubts of my colleagues"
Foreign Minister D. Petrovic:
We are not asking for a vote on anything yet, merely asking if there is any interest in a compromise, and suggesting processes in which smaller monarchies could be protected without gaining enough power to subvert the League. This seemed a point of interest for some, and so we seek to find a resolution on which we can compromise. The suggestion that smaller monarchies who wanted protection could choose to become a protectorate of a member nation was one suggestion, that a inferior class of members be instituted who can have protection but not full membership rights for such smaller nations, until they achieve what standards we set for those full rights is another.
Regardless of whether anyone agrees with any of our proposals, is there any interest in protecting smaller monarchies, and so coming to a compromise for how that could be done without risking the integrity of the League, or is this just a club for older, established ones?