Brytene wrote:Yeah don't actually answer that or anything. Just cry "strawman" and act like that defeats the question.
Were the gestapo not a state-sponsored group?
Were they not a 'legitimate' organization?
A state-sponsored armed group that will probably kill you anyway has you outnumbered, outgunned and surrounded in hostile territory. Are you obliged to surrender?
No, but that's completely irrelevant for several reasons:
1 - The Brytisc are not Nazis, but well done
CADI are not the Taliban, but what does this prove?
2 - Who said 'obliged to surrender'? We're talking about whether one government body would recognise the other (the Gestapo) as a legitimate government entity or not.
So then any government can recognise another as legitimate, right?
Also, this stems from the root point where I called the Bryt govt. hypocrites for having their embassy staff choose one option, and then getting butthurt the Cuscatlanis choose that same option when it was Brytons who came knocking...
So yeah it's about when do you surrender and when do you choose to die fighting?
Who's government are we talking about here?
Because:
1) The Cuscatlani's never implied that CADI has nor will ever have anywhere near the authority El Caudillo's Junta and it's subsidiaries (police, DINA, military, ect)
2) Wouldn't they want to undermine the legitimacy of your government by
but by allowing a brytisc embassy, cusc recognises the bryt government as legitimate.
Yeah, and they also view CADI as a legitimate organization. So what's your point?
Unless they have some bizarre 'ranking' of legitimacy, then putting one recognised government on the same level as lawless terrorists puts all recognised governments on that level.
> Implying Cuscatlan lists CADI as a terrorist group
> Implying the governments who matter to Cuscatlan care
"non-realism"
lol
Wrong.
They said that the foreign organization CADI and the foreign Bryistic State have the same legal standing in Cuscatlan (i.e. they are all tolerated so long as the junta allows it);
Wrong - that's not how embassies and nation-to-nation politics works lol
It's basically how it works in Cuscatlan.
Inyursta is not that much different except we at least have a portion of people in power who legitimately try to curb CADI and Contré-Rouje's activities and get them disarmed.
So when I back up my claim with valid scientific sources and argued against your deductive fallacy; and you come back with nothing its "going in idiotic circles"?
Is that whats happening here?
Literally whatever you want can be happening here, ten internets to you smh
What?
Is this the closest I will get to you conceding that your character was entirely wrong about the definition of poison?
probs later today
