Cedoria unveils Vallen Doctrine (MT, Diplomatic Only, Open)

[Cedoria]

In recent decades, the People's Republic of Cedoria has undergone a major economic and social transformation. With decades of massive economic growth, rapid improvements in living standards and corresponding growth in infrastructure, the People's Republic of Cedoria is a powerful and influential player in the Asia-Pacific region. Of course, it has also undergone a military transformation, with a large, professionalised Army, Navy Airforce and an intelligence network rumoured to have global reach and capability to conduct operations.

Given this, it has recently become apparent that Cedoria needs to update it's foreign policy doctrine to reflect the economic and strategic realities it faces. The previous doctrine of "revolutionary interventionism" was promulgated when Cedoria was a minor power just emerging from the throes of the Revolution and thus is no longer appropriate for today's world.

Therefore, Chairman Vallance Vallen formally unveiled today in a speech broadcast across state television and internationally via the internet, a new foreign policy outlook for Cedoria, dubbed, "The Vallen Doctrine" after it's architect, the intellectually gigantic Chairman himself!


The basic tenets of the Vallen Doctrine are as follows.

1: The People’s Republic of Cedoria will not tolerate any interference from foreign powers in the internal affairs of the Asia-Pacific region of the world. Any attempts from outside powers to colonise land, conquer territory or upset the balance of power in the region will be considered acts of aggression mandating Cedorian military intervention.
2: The People’s Republic of Cedoria considers the Asia-Pacific region to be part of our core national interests. We have a firm commitment to promoting economic development, freedom of navigation and maritime commerce, long-term economic growth and prosperity, education and basic living standards and ensuring the security and stability of this region and the people and nations that inhabit it.
3: The Asia-Pacific region is a region of vital economic and strategic importance to the People’s Republic of Cedoria. We seek to ensure the security and stability of this region, in order to promote peace and harmony between nations in this region. Any attempts to undermine the peace and security of the People’s Republic of Cedoria, or the Asia-Pacific region as a whole, from any nation, will be seen as a threat and will mandate a Cedorian response under this doctrine.
4: The People’s Republic of Cedoria will actively lead the way in seeking to promote good relations between the nations of the Asia-Pacific. Strong partnerships will help these nations deal with all challenges and Cedoria will work to ensure that this region remains secure and harmonious. Increasing regional integration and cooperation will lead to a more lasting and secure peace in this region.
5: The People’s Republic of Cedoria reserves the right to intervene when any nation, from outside or within the Asia-Pacific, threatens the continued peace and prosperity of the Asia-Pacific region as a whole. We reserve the right to use whatever means necessary to ensure that such actions are punished to ensure continued peace and prosperity in this region.
6: The People’s Republic of Cedoria will seek mutual partnerships with all the nations of this region, and maintains its belief that the use of military force is only to occur when all other options are exhausted.

The Vallen Doctrine has received both praise and criticism, and is highly controversial. Many supporters, both domestic and international, maintain that it will bind the Asia-Pacific region closer together and contribute to a safer region through closer cooperation on key issues and challenges. However critics argue that the Doctrine has a number of key points, particularly Article 5, that are severely open to creative interpretations, and argue that the Doctrine is merely an ill-disguised statement that the People’s Republic of Cedoria intends to act like a regional Hegemon in Asia, much like the United States has previously done with the Monroe Doctrine. Given the massive economic growth, rapid improvement in living standards and rapidly growing military forces of the People’s Republic of Cedoria, some fear that they will in fact soon have the military power necessary to do this if they choose to do so. The Chairman also stated that this Doctrine still does not preclude Cedoria from intervening in the affairs of nations where there is firm evidence of exploitative or immoral behaviour from Capitalist or Fascist governments, and does not preclude Cedoria from assisting Communist revolutionary groups in circumstances where it is deemed necessary to do so.

We now await the reaction of the international community to this new Vallen Doctrine.

[Knockturn Alley]

Scene: Tom Weasley's Office, Leaky Cauldron, Knockturn Alley: 1905 hours
"Hmm...", mused Tom Weasley, "I wonder..."
His secretary Clarke, sitting opposite to him with a certain amount of apprehension, knew far better than to ask him what he wondered.
As his eyes moved lower on the piece of parchment, there was an unmistakable sign of anger.
Clarke knew he would not take kindly to Article 5 of the Vallen Doctrine.
"...reserves the right to intervene...", Tom scoffed, "what a load of crap. A few full coffers and they consider themselves all high-and-mighty to do whatever they like!"
"Take this down, Clarke!"

To: Cedoria
From: Tom Weasley

We have been alerted to the tenets of the Vallen Doctrine. It seems as if you are taking it upon yourself to act as the mediator in the Asia-Pacific, and although Knockturn Alley has no intention of intruding in the internal matters of the nations, certain consequences felt in the Catalan region may render it necessary for Knockturn intervention. I am certain that your intentions were noble but playing the role of a pivot in world affairs is a dangerous one. I am referring of course to the terrorist groups residing in Philippines whose acts usually go unchecked. Also large groups of illegal immigrants from the Asia-Pacific region have disrupted our nation. Thus in the near or distant future it may be in the best interests of Knockturn Alley to intervene. In that case it would go against the flawed Vallen Doctrine, so we request the wording of Clause 1 be changed appropriately and that Clause 5 be removed.

"That will do, Clarke." Tom Weasley slowly got up and faced away from Clarke towards the window where a cool breeze was drifting in. This was the only place on earth where the stars would still be visible. The only nation in the world where only sustainable energy was used. He would not let another inferior nation dictate rules to him.

[Cedoria]

Scene: Tom Weasley's Office, Leaky Cauldron, Knockturn Alley: 1905 hours
"Hmm...", mused Tom Weasley, "I wonder..."
His secretary Clarke, sitting opposite to him with a certain amount of apprehension, knew far better than to ask him what he wondered.
As his eyes moved lower on the piece of parchment, there was an unmistakable sign of anger.
Clarke knew he would not take kindly to Article 5 of the Vallen Doctrine.
"...reserves the right to intervene...", Tom scoffed, "what a load of crap. A few full coffers and they consider themselves all high-and-mighty to do whatever they like!"
"Take this down, Clarke!"

To: Cedoria
From: Tom Weasley

We have been alerted to the tenets of the Vallen Doctrine. It seems as if you are taking it upon yourself to act as the mediator in the Asia-Pacific, and although Knockturn Alley has no intention of intruding in the internal matters of the nations, certain consequences felt in the Catalan region may render it necessary for Knockturn intervention. I am certain that your intentions were noble but playing the role of a pivot in world affairs is a dangerous one. I am referring of course to the terrorist groups residing in Philippines whose acts usually go unchecked. Also large groups of illegal immigrants from the Asia-Pacific region have disrupted our nation. Thus in the near or distant future it may be in the best interests of Knockturn Alley to intervene. In that case it would go against the flawed Vallen Doctrine, so we request the wording of Clause 1 be changed appropriately and that Clause 5 be removed.

"That will do, Clarke." Tom Weasley slowly got up and faced away from Clarke towards the window where a cool breeze was drifting in. This was the only place on earth where the stars would still be visible. The only nation in the world where only sustainable energy was used. He would not let another inferior nation dictate rules to him.

Sadly we cannot repudiate the doctrine, as this would endanger our peace and security, as well as that of Asia as a whole. However, in the case of the specific instances which you have mentioned, we would be more than happy to assist you. With our naval ships patrolling the sea lanes, we would be able to disut the flow of illegal immigrants for you without necessitating your intervention. As for the terrorists, we may also be willing to help you their, and in fact we would welcome your intelligence agencies sending us whatever information you have on them, enabling us to more efficiently work together to disrupt their activities, and this, obviously would negate the need for you to intervene again.

This Vallen Doctrine can actually be of great assistance to you if you are willing to work with us in the interests of peace and freedom.

Hoping we can come to an agreement
Chairman Vallance Vallen, People's Republic of Cedoria

[Knockturn Alley]

Scene: Tom Weasley's Office, Leaky Cauldron, Knockturn Alley: 1905 hours
"Hmm...", mused Tom Weasley, "I wonder..."
His secretary Clarke, sitting opposite to him with a certain amount of apprehension, knew far better than to ask him what he wondered.
As his eyes moved lower on the piece of parchment, there was an unmistakable sign of anger.
Clarke knew he would not take kindly to Article 5 of the Vallen Doctrine.
"...reserves the right to intervene...", Tom scoffed, "what a load of crap. A few full coffers and they consider themselves all high-and-mighty to do whatever they like!"
"Take this down, Clarke!"

To: Cedoria
From: Tom Weasley

We have been alerted to the tenets of the Vallen Doctrine. It seems as if you are taking it upon yourself to act as the mediator in the Asia-Pacific, and although Knockturn Alley has no intention of intruding in the internal matters of the nations, certain consequences felt in the Catalan region may render it necessary for Knockturn intervention. I am certain that your intentions were noble but playing the role of a pivot in world affairs is a dangerous one. I am referring of course to the terrorist groups residing in Philippines whose acts usually go unchecked. Also large groups of illegal immigrants from the Asia-Pacific region have disrupted our nation. Thus in the near or distant future it may be in the best interests of Knockturn Alley to intervene. In that case it would go against the flawed Vallen Doctrine, so we request the wording of Clause 1 be changed appropriately and that Clause 5 be removed.

"That will do, Clarke." Tom Weasley slowly got up and faced away from Clarke towards the window where a cool breeze was drifting in. This was the only place on earth where the stars would still be visible. The only nation in the world where only sustainable energy was used. He would not let another inferior nation dictate rules to him.

Sadly we cannot repudiate the doctrine, as this would endanger our peace and security, as well as that of Asia as a whole. However, in the case of the specific instances which you have mentioned, we would be more than happy to assist you. With our naval ships patrolling the sea lanes, we would be able to disut the flow of illegal immigrants for you without necessitating your intervention. As for the terrorists, we may also be willing to help you their, and in fact we would welcome your intelligence agencies sending us whatever information you have on them, enabling us to more efficiently work together to disrupt their activities, and this, obviously would negate the need for you to intervene again.

This Vallen Doctrine can actually be of great assistance to you if you are willing to work with us in the interests of peace and freedom.

Hoping we can come to an agreement
Chairman Vallance Vallen, People's Republic of Cedoria

In that case, our problem is resolved. We shall not intervene and you shall assist us in both those matters. Our intelligence agents are currently working undercover, when they return I shall ask them to find information about terrorist groups

[Motokata]

Motokata admires Cedoria's fervor for safe guarding the Asia-Pacific rim and Vallance Vallen's ideals are there and solid. We don't see it as a threat or saber rattling like other documents or creeds often tend to be but a fairly blunt deceleration of the nation's foreign policy towards like nations. Generally Motokata does not make it it's business to intervene or meddle in the affairs of a nation that have no bearing on our own national interest or the interest of our allies so we do find clause five a bit worrisome. We'll be continuing careful observation but won't commit to any immediate deals without diplomatic discussion naturally.

Kaori Oda-Sparrow - Supreme State Holder The Motokata-Philippine nation
Ko Otani - Executive of State
Yuu Kouga - Executive of Defense
Alejandra Ponce - Prime Minister the Philippine Island Territory of Motokata

[Terabat]

The nation of terabat,while being in an alliance with the cedorian's,can NOT support them on this doctrine.It appears the cedorians are simply trying to "guard" this region so that it may reap it's benefits unopposed,quite comparable to an empire and her colonies,claim a piece of land,defend it,then toss it out when it stops being profitable.terabat hopes this lack of support does not damage relations with her cedorian allies

[Bendicion]

OFFICIAL TELEGRAPH LINE OF THE REICH
FROM:Bendicion
TO:Vallen Doctrine Makers

Overall performance in the sudden growth of Cedoria is a good cause for the globall economy to work and that the volume of trade throughout the world will make other nations rich in wealth but others packed in debt.

The Reich disagrees with this 'doctrine',signifying that its articles make the Asia-Pacific region a place for Cedorian interests.Also declaring that it will bring peace to this economic powerhouse region.

Signifying that Cedoria must only cooperate with other Asian Pacific nations and not feel to itself as a supreme nation able to what it wants in thiss region. Because if Cedoria assumes great international power throughout Asian-Pacific region,the region will be abound with adminstrative & political disability as Cedoria interferes the nations.

Also suspicious that Cedoria will use its new profound military might to protct its fellow nations in the region.But in the articles,stating that protecting the nations must only be for national interests.And military presence may lead governments to abuse their peoples.And that such a wide area be controlled by a power.

We act to know what Cedoria has in stock for the Asia Pacific region.What policies does Cedoria do in cooperation with this Vallen Doctrine.And if Cedoria is doing this for the Asia Pacific region,what is its foreign policies say towards foreign affairs and war?

[Cedoria]

In that case, our problem is resolved. We shall not intervene and you shall assist us in both those matters. Our intelligence agents are currently working undercover, when they return I shall ask them to find information about terrorists.

To; Knockturn Allley,
From: People's Republic of Cedoria
This is pleasing, we are glad that we could find a way to cooperate and we hope that this will advance the cause of peace and stability in the region.

Motokata admires Cedoria's fervor for safe guarding the Asia-Pacific rim and Vallance Vallen's ideals are there and solid. We don't see it as a threat or saber rattling like other documents or creeds often tend to be but a fairly blunt deceleration of the nation's foreign policy towards like nations. Generally Motokata does not make it it's business to intervene or meddle in the affairs of a nation that have no bearing on our own national interest or the interest of our allies so we do find clause five a bit worrisome. We'll be continuing careful observation but won't commit to any immediate deals without diplomatic discussion naturally.

Kaori Oda-Sparrow - Supreme State Holder The Motokata-Philippine nation
Ko Otani - Executive of State
Yuu Kouga - Executive of Defense
Alejandra Ponce - Prime Minister the Philippine Island Territory of Motokata

To: Motokata
From: People's Republic of Cedoria

We would of course like to reassure you that we have no intention of interfering in internal affairs of nations unless it is absolutely necessary to do so, our primary interests are in promoting cooperation and economic development of this region as a whole. Peace and stability are our sole goals here, because having this will benefit Cedoria, as well as our allies and partners in this region.

We do believe that the national sovereignty of independent nations should only be violated if absolutely necessary, and the Vallen Doctrine reflects this.

The nation of terabat,while being in an alliance with the cedorian's,can NOT support them on this doctrine.It appears the cedorians are simply trying to "guard" this region so that it may reap it's benefits unopposed,quite comparable to an empire and her colonies,claim a piece of land,defend it,then toss it out when it stops being profitable.terabat hopes this lack of support does not damage relations with her cedorian allies

To: Terabat
From: Cedoria

You appear to be gravely misunderstanding the nature of this Doctrine comrades, Cedoria has no intention of acting like an Imperial power, indeed we are anti-imperialists in all forms. We have an interest in promoting economic development and political stability in ALL nations of the Asia-Pacific, because what is good for them is good for us. We will always maintain an interest in this region, because it is our neighbourhood, and it's successful development and peace is in our interests.

We do hope that you reconsider your refusal to support the Vallen Doctrine, in the interests of our strong economic and military alliance.

[b]OFFICIAL TELEGRAPH LINE OF THE REICH
FROM:Bendicion
TO:Vallen Doctrine Makers

Overall performance in the sudden growth of Cedoria is a good cause for the globall economy to work and that the volume of trade throughout the world will make other nations rich in wealth but others packed in debt.

The Reich disagrees with this 'doctrine',signifying that its articles make the Asia-Pacific region a place for Cedorian interests.Also declaring that it will bring peace to this economic powerhouse region.

Signifying that Cedoria must only cooperate with other Asian Pacific nations and not feel to itself as a supreme nation able to what it wants in thiss region. Because if Cedoria assumes great international power throughout Asian-Pacific region,the region will be abound with adminstrative & political disability as Cedoria interferes the nations.

Also suspicious that Cedoria will use its new profound military might to protct its fellow nations in the region.But in the articles,stating that protecting the nations must only be for national interests.And military presence may lead governments to abuse their peoples.And that such a wide area be controlled by a power.

We act to know what Cedoria has in stock for the Asia Pacific region.What policies does Cedoria do in cooperation with this Vallen Doctrine.And if Cedoria is doing this for the Asia Pacific region,what is its foreign policies say towards foreign affairs and war?

To: Bendicion
From: The People's Republic of Cedoria

You are certainly correct that the high economic growth rate in the People's Republic of Cedoria is certainly good for the world more broadly. This doctrine in fact does mandate that the People's Republic should cooperate with nations in the Asia-Pacific region for the world. We are an emerging great power in this region, and therefore we consider it a part of our responsibility to ensure that we work with our allies and partners to ensure that this region remains peaceful and that it's economies, nations and societies are more fully developed. We will not politically destabilise other nations in the region, in fact to suggest we would do so is foolhardy, as it runs counter to the whole point of the Vallen Doctrine, which promotes stability and cooperation.

Furthermore, we believe that our military power is necessary only be used to protect ourselves and the nations of the Asia-Pacific from foreign imperialism and threats to peace when their is no alternative. In situations where diplomacy is sufficient to resolve issues and disputes, we shall of course do so.

What do we desire for the Asia-Pacific? We desire peace, cooperation and stability. We desire that this region be transformed into a social, cultural and economic powerhouse, the world will be centred on Asia, and we believe that the nations of this region will have a pivotal role to play in world affairs in coming decades. Our policies of cooperation include, but are not limited to, economic development aid, emergency aid and disaster relief when necessary, freedom of navigation through protecting sea lanes, and taking action to combat terrorism, drug trafficking, political corruption and illegal immigration. Working with other nations, rather than instead of other nations, is the intention of this doctrine.


We do hope your nation will reconsider it's criticisms of the Vallen Doctrine, which ensures a firm commitment to increasing peace, prosperity and stability in the Asia-Pacific region.

[Mascargo]

To: The People's Republic of Cedoria; Chairman Vallance Vallen

Recently I was informed of a development in your country, known as the Vallen Doctrine. I wish to express what I consider valid concerns over the creation of this document, as well as the legality of it on an international level. I hope that through this discourse we might be able to rectify these issues or compromise on more promising solutions for both parties.

Primarily, my cabinet of advisers and I find it questionable that you consider your country a justifiable protector of other nations in the Asia-Pacific region. This doctrine establishes an unfair supremacy over other countries within the aforementioned region and sets an alarming precedent for expected actions from Cedoria. By establishing the People's Republic of Cedoria's right to regulate the Asia-Pacific, you are creating a haven for enemies of our nation as well as many others. Your nation has shown willingness to invade countries to support communist rebellions, which invalidates the right of all nations to remain independent and free of intervention.

I await a response from you. One that hopefully will clarify these issues that my cabinet (along with I) have brought up regarding the Vallen Doctrine.

Thank you for your time,

President Boris Yetasky,
The United Provinces of Mascargo

[Shazbotdom]

FROM THE OFFICE OF
THE PRIME MINISTER OF THE EMPIRE
MS. STEPHANIE F. ALRIDGE

If the Empire feels that in the interest of International Security, we need to invade a nation that is causing International Strife within the Asian Pacific Region, we will do so. We do not feel threatened by your nation. If this means that you will 'attempt' to intervene in the affairs of the Empire when your nation is not directly threatened, then any attempt to intervene in our affairs will be considered an Act of War on the Shazbotdom Empire.
I would hope that you decide not to intervene in our affairs if we need to invade or attack a nation within the Asian Pacific Region. If you do so, the we will have no choice but to retaliate with the full firepower of the Shazbotdom Armed Forces. Long live the Shazbotdom Empire. Veritas Omnia Vincit.

[Cedoria]

To: The People's Republic of Cedoria; Chairman Vallance Vallen

Recently I was informed of a development in your country, known as the Vallen Doctrine. I wish to express what I consider valid concerns over the creation of this document, as well as the legality of it on an international level. I hope that through this discourse we might be able to rectify these issues or compromise on more promising solutions for both parties.

Primarily, my cabinet of advisers and I find it questionable that you consider your country a justifiable protector of other nations in the Asia-Pacific region. This doctrine establishes an unfair supremacy over other countries within the aforementioned region and sets an alarming precedent for expected actions from Cedoria. By establishing the People's Republic of Cedoria's right to regulate the Asia-Pacific, you are creating a haven for enemies of our nation as well as many others. Your nation has shown willingness to invade countries to support communist rebellions, which invalidates the right of all nations to remain independent and free of intervention.

I await a response from you. One that hopefully will clarify these issues that my cabinet (along with I) have brought up regarding the Vallen Doctrine.

Thank you for your time,

President Boris Yetasky,
The United Provinces of Mascargo

From: The People's Republic of Cedoria
To: The United Provinces of Mascargo

We absolutely understand your concern, and we thank you for your rational communication of it too us. To be clear, the Vallen Doctrine does not establish Cedorian supremacy over anything, it simply communicates our willingness to increase cooperation and integration between Asia-Pacific region and a willingness to act to remove threats to Cedoria's security within the region. It does not imply wholesale dominion or hegemony in any way. We certainly regard military force to be used only as a last resort.
This doctrine is nothing more than a sensible response to Cedoria's security needs and interests. If similar issues where occurring in the region surrounding Mascargo, then we would have no issues with Mascargo taking similar actions in their own region.

If you have specific security concerns in the Asia-Pacific, then please contact us, and we may be able to come to an agreement regarding an appropriate manner of dealing with them. Certainly we may well be willing to allow intervention of outside forces in certain circumstances, but it would depend wholly on the circumstances.

We thank you for communicating these concerns, and we hope that these assurances are sufficient to assuage your concerns.

(Image)

FROM THE OFFICE OF
THE PRIME MINISTER OF THE EMPIRE
MS. STEPHANIE F. ALRIDGE

(Image)

If the Empire feels that in the interest of International Security, we need to invade a nation that is causing International Strife within the Asian Pacific Region, we will do so. We do not feel threatened by your nation. If this means that you will 'attempt' to intervene in the affairs of the Empire when your nation is not directly threatened, then any attempt to intervene in our affairs will be considered an Act of War on the Shazbotdom Empire.
I would hope that you decide not to intervene in our affairs if we need to invade or attack a nation within the Asian Pacific Region. If you do so, the we will have no choice but to retaliate with the full firepower of the Shazbotdom Armed Forces. Long live the Shazbotdom Empire. Veritas Omnia Vincit.

Rest assured Prime Minister, we too would certainly violate the sovereignty of a nation causing international strife if other options had been exhausted. We will intervene only in circumstances where necessary to do so, but only then. Given that we are in agreement about this issue, I see no reason for the threatening and vulgar tone of your letter.

We are simply expressing our joint concerns with the nations of the Asia-Pacific, and our willingness to increase regional cooperation to deal with them. Threatening, bellicose language from you is unnecessary.

[Mascargo]

From: The People's Republic of Cedoria
To: The United Provinces of Mascargo

We absolutely understand your concern, and we thank you for your rational communication of it too us. To be clear, the Vallen Doctrine does not establish Cedorian supremacy over anything, it simply communicates our willingness to increase cooperation and integration between Asia-Pacific region and a willingness to act to remove threats to Cedoria's security within the region. It does not imply wholesale dominion or hegemony in any way. We certainly regard military force to be used only as a last resort.
This doctrine is nothing more than a sensible response to Cedoria's security needs and interests. If similar issues where occurring in the region surrounding Mascargo, then we would have no issues with Mascargo taking similar actions in their own region.

If you have specific security concerns in the Asia-Pacific, then please contact us, and we may be able to come to an agreement regarding an appropriate manner of dealing with them. Certainly we may well be willing to allow intervention of outside forces in certain circumstances, but it would depend wholly on the circumstances.

We thank you for communicating these concerns, and we hope that these assurances are sufficient to assuage your concerns.

To: The People's Republic of Cedoria

Thank you for the swift reply. Your clarification of the Vallen Doctrine does indeed placate most of our concerns with Cedoria. Being that you are a nation of respectable worth and might, I feel willingness to believe that you intend not to encroach upon independent nations without their consent or desperate reasons requiring immediate action. The idea of a dominion over the Asia-Pacific was worrisome at best, but the assurance of a fair and non-hegemonic doctrine will be supported by Mascargo.

On another note, I must question how effective this doctrine will be on preventing hostile elements (terrorists, rebels, etc.) from forming in countries location in the Asia-Pacific. The Vallen Doctrine has allocated Cedoria the ability and legality to patrol their region and insure domestic tranquility for all involved, but how exactly will this be carried out and enforced? Does a military protocol exist? Mascargo has had a storied past with terrorism and does not tolerate their existence. Any assurances given over this would be greatly appreciated.

President Boris Yetasky,
The United Provinces of Mascargo

[Cedoria]

From: The People's Republic of Cedoria
To: The United Provinces of Mascargo

We absolutely understand your concern, and we thank you for your rational communication of it too us. To be clear, the Vallen Doctrine does not establish Cedorian supremacy over anything, it simply communicates our willingness to increase cooperation and integration between Asia-Pacific region and a willingness to act to remove threats to Cedoria's security within the region. It does not imply wholesale dominion or hegemony in any way. We certainly regard military force to be used only as a last resort.
This doctrine is nothing more than a sensible response to Cedoria's security needs and interests. If similar issues where occurring in the region surrounding Mascargo, then we would have no issues with Mascargo taking similar actions in their own region.

If you have specific security concerns in the Asia-Pacific, then please contact us, and we may be able to come to an agreement regarding an appropriate manner of dealing with them. Certainly we may well be willing to allow intervention of outside forces in certain circumstances, but it would depend wholly on the circumstances.

We thank you for communicating these concerns, and we hope that these assurances are sufficient to assuage your concerns.

To: The People's Republic of Cedoria

Thank you for the swift reply. Your clarification of the Vallen Doctrine does indeed placate most of our concerns with Cedoria. Being that you are a nation of respectable worth and might, I feel willingness to believe that you intend not to encroach upon independent nations without their consent or desperate reasons requiring immediate action. The idea of a dominion over the Asia-Pacific was worrisome at best, but the assurance of a fair and non-hegemonic doctrine will be supported by Mascargo.

On another note, I must question how effective this doctrine will be on preventing hostile elements (terrorists, rebels, etc.) from forming in countries location in the Asia-Pacific. The Vallen Doctrine has allocated Cedoria the ability and legality to patrol their region and insure domestic tranquility for all involved, but how exactly will this be carried out and enforced? Does a military protocol exist? Mascargo has had a storied past with terrorism and does not tolerate their existence. Any assurances given over this would be greatly appreciated.

President Boris Yetasky,
The United Provinces of Mascargo

To: President Boris Yetasky
From: Chairman Vallance Vallen

Of course we certainly hope that this doctrine will be effective in curtailing the activities of terrorists and ensuring the peaceful, stable development of nations in this region. We certainly can, and do, as of this Doctrine, run frequent naval patrols through the territorial waters of the People's Republic of Cedoria and international waters in the Asia-Pacific that we consider to be necessary to ensure freedom of navigation and maritime commerce, this is part of a method of preventing piracy or terrorism from disrupting trade and commerce, and also ensuring effective interdiction of traffickers and illegal immigrants throughout the region. In circumstances where terrorists form in nations of the Asia-Pacific, we would always prefer to try and bolster the ability of the national government in question to respond to the threat and adequately tackle it on their own. Whether through military aid and training, intelligence sharing or bolstering security cooperation, we would certainly be working with local partners to effectively combat the threat. This is the assurance we give to you.

Of course, in circumstances where a terrorist group forms with the approval and support of a national government, and said government resists any international efforts to cease their sponsorship, then we may need to intervene directly, but we would attempt to exhaust all other avenues before taking such a drastic step obviously.

We hope that this is sufficient assurance for you on this matter.

[Mascargo]

To: President Boris Yetasky
From: Chairman Vallance Vallen

Of course we certainly hope that this doctrine will be effective in curtailing the activities of terrorists and ensuring the peaceful, stable development of nations in this region. We certainly can, and do, as of this Doctrine, run frequent naval patrols through the territorial waters of the People's Republic of Cedoria and international waters in the Asia-Pacific that we consider to be necessary to ensure freedom of navigation and maritime commerce, this is part of a method of preventing piracy or terrorism from disrupting trade and commerce, and also ensuring effective interdiction of traffickers and illegal immigrants throughout the region. In circumstances where terrorists form in nations of the Asia-Pacific, we would always prefer to try and bolster the ability of the national government in question to respond to the threat and adequately tackle it on their own. Whether through military aid and training, intelligence sharing or bolstering security cooperation, we would certainly be working with local partners to effectively combat the threat. This is the assurance we give to you.

Of course, in circumstances where a terrorist group forms with the approval and support of a national government, and said government resists any international efforts to cease their sponsorship, then we may need to intervene directly, but we would attempt to exhaust all other avenues before taking such a drastic step obviously.

We hope that this is sufficient assurance for you on this matter.

To: Chairman Vallance Vallen

These clarifications on military protocol involving terror nations are suitable. The Vallen Doctrine does indeed allow you the ability to promote security in the region and prevent extensive and often seditious terror movements from forming or gaining ground.

How does the Vallen Doctrine interfere with allies in general? If another nation in the Asia-Pacific region was to formulate an alliance with an exterior power, would this violate the established doctrine tenants 1 & 5? Furthermore, if a nation residing inside of the Asia-Pacific went to war with another country outside of the region, how would this affect the doctrine? What measures would be taken?

I question the danger this doctrine could pose with restricting the freedom of nations to choose allies and actively engage in defensive confrontations with said allies. The Vallen Doctrine could be loosely interpreted to allow Cedoria legal entry into any conflict where an Asian-Pacific nation is involved, regardless of side or actual weight of participation.

President Boris Yetasky,
United Provinces of Mascargo

[Cedoria]

To: President Boris Yetasky
From: Chairman Vallance Vallen

Of course we certainly hope that this doctrine will be effective in curtailing the activities of terrorists and ensuring the peaceful, stable development of nations in this region. We certainly can, and do, as of this Doctrine, run frequent naval patrols through the territorial waters of the People's Republic of Cedoria and international waters in the Asia-Pacific that we consider to be necessary to ensure freedom of navigation and maritime commerce, this is part of a method of preventing piracy or terrorism from disrupting trade and commerce, and also ensuring effective interdiction of traffickers and illegal immigrants throughout the region. In circumstances where terrorists form in nations of the Asia-Pacific, we would always prefer to try and bolster the ability of the national government in question to respond to the threat and adequately tackle it on their own. Whether through military aid and training, intelligence sharing or bolstering security cooperation, we would certainly be working with local partners to effectively combat the threat. This is the assurance we give to you.

Of course, in circumstances where a terrorist group forms with the approval and support of a national government, and said government resists any international efforts to cease their sponsorship, then we may need to intervene directly, but we would attempt to exhaust all other avenues before taking such a drastic step obviously.

We hope that this is sufficient assurance for you on this matter.

To: Chairman Vallance Vallen

These clarifications on military protocol involving terror nations are suitable. The Vallen Doctrine does indeed allow you the ability to promote security in the region and prevent extensive and often seditious terror movements from forming or gaining ground.

How does the Vallen Doctrine interfere with allies in general? If another nation in the Asia-Pacific region was to formulate an alliance with an exterior power, would this violate the established doctrine tenants 1 & 5? Furthermore, if a nation residing inside of the Asia-Pacific went to war with another country outside of the region, how would this affect the doctrine? What measures would be taken?

I question the danger this doctrine could pose with restricting the freedom of nations to choose allies and actively engage in defensive confrontations with said allies. The Vallen Doctrine could be loosely interpreted to allow Cedoria legal entry into any conflict where an Asian-Pacific nation is involved, regardless of side or actual weight of participation.

President Boris Yetasky,
United Provinces of Mascargo

To: President Boris Yetasky
From: Chairman Vallance Vallen
If another nation in the Asia-Pacific were to form an alliance with a nation outside the region, it would be illogical for us to say it violated the doctrine, so long as such alliance was engaged in freely by the Asia-Pacific nation in question, was defensive in nature and did not threaten Cedorian sovereignty or interests. So no, nothing in the Doctrine inhibits the rights of Asia-Pacific nations to form their own alliances, so long as those alliances are not a threat to us.

On the other issue, if an Asia-Pacific nation intervened in outside regions, it would depend on the circumstances as to the action taken. In cases of humanitarian interventions against egregious human rights violations for instance, no action would be mandated, indeed, we would commend such action as necessary for peace and international security. In cases of blatantly expansionistic or hegemonic land grabs, then obviously steps would be taken to punish or discourage such actions. Including possibly, diplomatic condemnation, economic sanctions and, only if absolutely necessary, military intervention to secure the peace.

Again, we stress, this is not a hegemonic doctrine, we condemn Imperialism in all of it's forms. So long as Asia-Pacific nations strive to promote economic development and a willingness to promote peace and security, than they have nothing to fear, and as long as outside powers such as your fine nation respect this, they have nothing to fear from this doctrine either.

[Mascargo]

To: President Boris Yetasky
From: Chairman Vallance Vallen
If another nation in the Asia-Pacific were to form an alliance with a nation outside the region, it would be illogical for us to say it violated the doctrine, so long as such alliance was engaged in freely by the Asia-Pacific nation in question, was defensive in nature and did not threaten Cedorian sovereignty or interests. So no, nothing in the Doctrine inhibits the rights of Asia-Pacific nations to form their own alliances, so long as those alliances are not a threat to us.

On the other issue, if an Asia-Pacific nation intervened in outside regions, it would depend on the circumstances as to the action taken. In cases of humanitarian interventions against egregious human rights violations for instance, no action would be mandated, indeed, we would commend such action as necessary for peace and international security. In cases of blatantly expansionistic or hegemonic land grabs, then obviously steps would be taken to punish or discourage such actions. Including possibly, diplomatic condemnation, economic sanctions and, only if absolutely necessary, military intervention to secure the peace.

Again, we stress, this is not a hegemonic doctrine, we condemn Imperialism in all of it's forms. So long as Asia-Pacific nations strive to promote economic development and a willingness to promote peace and security, than they have nothing to fear, and as long as outside powers such as your fine nation respect this, they have nothing to fear from this doctrine either.

To: Chairman Vallance Vallen

Yet again, thank you for clarifying any questions that I have had about this doctrine.

What is Cedoria's stance on allowing other nations to support and assist in enforcing the Vallen Doctrine? Obviously Cedoria would wish to remain an active role in every single affair, but in case of a foreign attack or an attempt of colonial expansion it would seem that Cedoria would be against a stronger foe. Does the Vallen Doctrine disallow foreign nations from supporting and actively monitoring the tenants, so long as they follow the requests of the People's Republic of Cedoria?

To clarify what I am asking: can a foreign nation not located in the Asia-Pacific become a primary participant and enforcer of the Vallen Doctrine, so long as they respect the sole-authority that Cedoria has over the region and only engages in war, with countries located in the region, at Cedoria's request?

President Boris Yetasky,
United Provinces of Mascargo

[The DDR]

To: Chairman Vallance Vallen of Cedoria
From: Generalmajor a.D. Sigmund Jähn, Staatspräsident und Vorsitzender des Staatsrats

Subject: The Vallen Doctrine

---

Dear Chairman,
First, let me express my congratulations for getting a foreign diplomatic doctrine after you. It is an honour bestowed on a very certain few.
I have to applaud your decision to seize the mantle as hegemonic power of the Asia-Pacific Region. It is a very troublesome region with many different interests, not all of them good, and a regulating hegemonic power will do very good, especially when it comes from the ranks of the nations present.

But I am concerned about a few things: The DDR has strong trading relations to several partners in the Asia-Pacific Region, as well as we train so called "Vertragsarbeiter" from these nations here in the DDR. Since we have peaceful interests in this region, we wish to continue these relations and training programs, but the newly taken up hegemonial mantle of the People's Republic of Cedoria stands in its way.
The Vallen-Doctrine, at least according to my reading and the readings of many of my advisors, basically declares the Asia-Pacific Region to your playground and to your playground alone. First off, the region isn't anyones playground, and secondly, many points of the Vallen-Doctrine promote a seclusion of the Asia-Pacific Region under Cedorian Leadership, promoted by Cedorian Strength of Arms.
Especially reviewing the points 4 and 6 give this impression. The DDR believes in the sovereign rights of every nation and every people, including the sovereign right of working out their problems with their neighbours on their own, maybe under mediation of another power, but not with this power playing judge, jury and executioner in one.
This, and a few other things, have me worried for the peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific Region, for not everyone will fold to the demands of the Vallen Doctrine that easily. I hope you can relieve me of my worries, especially since Staatsrat, Ministerrat and Volkskammer wish for peaceful relations to Cedoria, the Asia-Pacific Region and their wellbeing now and in the future.

I eagerly await your response.
Signed,
Generalmajor a.D. Sigmund Jähn,
Staatspräsident und Vorsitzender des Staatsrats

P.S.: Being a hegemon doesn't automatically mean being an imperialist. Being a hegemon basically means, that you are the most powerful one in a certain region - it is, what you do with your power, that determines, if you are an imperialist or not.

[Organized States]

OOC: "Big Stick Diplomacy"

Stars and Stripes

Pacific Resolve tests OSAF Capabilities and reassures Allies in the Asia-Pacific
Josh Westman
Fairford Bureau, 4/2/15

2 F-22As of the 8th Fighter Wing, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaskan Commonwealth taxi upon arrival at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, Japan

Operation Pacific Resolve kicked off today as 12 Theater Security Packages moved to their respective Temporary Duty Stations at multiple bases across the Asia-Pacific region. The first region-wide exercise since 1963, was hailed by PACAF Commanders as historic.

"I think we've greatly increased and were able our capabilities and were able to showcase them around the region. I'd like to thank all of our host nations and OSAF host units participating along with us in Pacific Resolve for their willingness and great hospitality, and I'm also glad that we are being given the opportunity to work with our Asian allies." Lt. Colonel Edward McManis, of the 48th Fighter Squadron, California Air National Guard, said upon arrival at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa.

F-22s from the Alaska, Virginia, and California Air National Guards and F-35s from the Arizona and Vermont Air National Guards along with support assets from the Pennsylvania, Iowa, Utah, Nevada, Oklahoma, and Oregon Air National Guards were deployed to temporarily to supplement current forces in the Region. Bases participating in the exercise are: Osan AB, Kunsan AB, Kadena AB, Misawa AB, Yokota AB, Joint Base Hickam-Pearl Harbor, Andersen AFB, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, and Clark AB. This deployment, the largest since 2003, has also been hailed by regional Allies such as the Philippines, Japan, the Taitung Islands, the Republic of China, and South Korea as a critical step in furthering the cause of regional security against what has been described as "Damaging and aggressive actions" to Peace in the Asia-Pacific region by OS diplomats. However, the President and Defense Department officials have repeatably denied that Pacific Resolve is specifically directed to any particular nation in the region.

"We will stay the course. There will be no interruption in our realignment to the Asia-Pacific." President Ellsworth said in a Press Conference early yesterday morning in Fairford when asked about the new Cedorian doctrine. The President went on to also refer to the Cedorian comments as "Destructive and Detrimental to Peace in the region".

[Quirina]

Ang Kasakupang Quirino sa Euro-Asya
The Federation of Malaysia
The Eurasian Quirinosphere

---

"Strong Nations, Glorious History"

---

The prepared meeting of representatives of the nations in the Asian side of the Quirinosphere is expected to show to the world the true meaning of cooperation, power, and gratitude to the Quirinese as part of the world's ever growing international confederation of nations with forebearing importance to independence, sovereignty and self-determination through free trade, continuous military buildup for a secure Asian future and economic growth that will last for many centuries.

The leaders of the Nationalist Government of Nanjing-Republic of China, Indonesian Republic, Federation of Malaysia, Kingdom of Siam, Philippine Republic & its Indies, Empire of Japan, Empire of Korea, with Republic of East Timor, Republic of Vietnam, Kingdom of Laos,and the Kingdom of Cambodia as observer representatives to show their willingness to cooperate with the Quirinosphere. Headed by the Philippine delegation, EUAQ Summit Chairman Romualdo Galvez promised "to solidify their intent to keep the close bond between states and meddle issues diplomatically without any significant interference or unnecessary intervention, for the sake of false pretenses of progress and masking expansionist ambitions through security and goodwill." He added that "there will be no tolerance if our solid pact shall be threatened by internal or external force, as it will always retaliate with a much stronger equivalent, amounting to a hundredfold of return."

Asked about their concern in the Cedorian doctrine, he mentioned of "cooperation with each other as institutions sufficient and rightful to secure their interests within, as Asia will remain one of the best places in the world through prosperity and posterity." He added that "if ever there will be lines crossed, our military personnel will speak for themselves of this [supposed military affairs] matter." The Asian side of the EUAQ has been the bastion of supremacy of the Great Republic since, and the recent tie-up with Columbia (Organized States) for successful military initiative remains one of the hallmarks of the Quirinosphere in entertaining "guests of honor".

The EURACCOM (Eurasian Central Command) also stated their willingness to follow any necessary protocols if ever there will be "lines crossed" by the Vallen doctrine. Spokesperson Nikitin Yevgenievich, Brigadier General from the Georgian Armed Forces stated that "they will make sure continuing and existing order in the Eurasian sphere to continue regardless if there will be a ton of pages that will be published just to say they dominate clay." He added that "if they are not willing to face the real essence of the situation, which is they have less capability to strive, they better turn somewhere else or regret that they ever published such piece of paper [Vallen doctrine]." He also affirmed that Columbian military exercises and activities are undergoing to reassure that "security is still permeating in all parts of Asia." Military analysts also refreshed the history of strengthened ties of the central government with their allies in the Asia-Pacific, which is now the present-day Eurasian Sphere.

[Zhouran]

"Those Cedorians are bluffing. It's amazing how they have the audacity and insolence to create this doctrine. But hey, everyone in the Asia-Pacific region loves to play The Big Stick Policy, but why have a big stick when you can have a sword?"

- Chief Admiral Li Yuan

[Cedoria]

To: President Boris Yetasky
From: Chairman Vallance Vallen
If another nation in the Asia-Pacific were to form an alliance with a nation outside the region, it would be illogical for us to say it violated the doctrine, so long as such alliance was engaged in freely by the Asia-Pacific nation in question, was defensive in nature and did not threaten Cedorian sovereignty or interests. So no, nothing in the Doctrine inhibits the rights of Asia-Pacific nations to form their own alliances, so long as those alliances are not a threat to us.

On the other issue, if an Asia-Pacific nation intervened in outside regions, it would depend on the circumstances as to the action taken. In cases of humanitarian interventions against egregious human rights violations for instance, no action would be mandated, indeed, we would commend such action as necessary for peace and international security. In cases of blatantly expansionistic or hegemonic land grabs, then obviously steps would be taken to punish or discourage such actions. Including possibly, diplomatic condemnation, economic sanctions and, only if absolutely necessary, military intervention to secure the peace.

Again, we stress, this is not a hegemonic doctrine, we condemn Imperialism in all of it's forms. So long as Asia-Pacific nations strive to promote economic development and a willingness to promote peace and security, than they have nothing to fear, and as long as outside powers such as your fine nation respect this, they have nothing to fear from this doctrine either.

To: Chairman Vallance Vallen

Yet again, thank you for clarifying any questions that I have had about this doctrine.

What is Cedoria's stance on allowing other nations to support and assist in enforcing the Vallen Doctrine? Obviously Cedoria would wish to remain an active role in every single affair, but in case of a foreign attack or an attempt of colonial expansion it would seem that Cedoria would be against a stronger foe. Does the Vallen Doctrine disallow foreign nations from supporting and actively monitoring the tenants, so long as they follow the requests of the People's Republic of Cedoria?

To clarify what I am asking: can a foreign nation not located in the Asia-Pacific become a primary participant and enforcer of the Vallen Doctrine, so long as they respect the sole-authority that Cedoria has over the region and only engages in war, with countries located in the region, at Cedoria's request?

President Boris Yetasky,
United Provinces of Mascargo

To: President Boris Yetasky
From: Chairman Vallance Vallen
If another nation wanted to assist Cedoria in the policing or enforcement of the Vallen Doctrine on rouge states, we would of course have no qualms about them doing so. Their is nothing that prevents nations from outside assisting Cedoria in the protection of this region and it's inhabitants from foreign colonialism at our request, in fact we could even encourage it.

Yes, other nations can be involved, so long as they do not violate the principles of the Vallen Doctrine.

To: Chairman Vallance Vallen of Cedoria
From: Generalmajor a.D. Sigmund Jähn, Staatspräsident und Vorsitzender des Staatsrats

Subject: The Vallen Doctrine

---

Dear Chairman,
First, let me express my congratulations for getting a foreign diplomatic doctrine after you. It is an honour bestowed on a very certain few.
I have to applaud your decision to seize the mantle as hegemonic power of the Asia-Pacific Region. It is a very troublesome region with many different interests, not all of them good, and a regulating hegemonic power will do very good, especially when it comes from the ranks of the nations present.

But I am concerned about a few things: The DDR has strong trading relations to several partners in the Asia-Pacific Region, as well as we train so called "Vertragsarbeiter" from these nations here in the DDR. Since we have peaceful interests in this region, we wish to continue these relations and training programs, but the newly taken up hegemonial mantle of the People's Republic of Cedoria stands in its way.
The Vallen-Doctrine, at least according to my reading and the readings of many of my advisors, basically declares the Asia-Pacific Region to your playground and to your playground alone. First off, the region isn't anyones playground, and secondly, many points of the Vallen-Doctrine promote a seclusion of the Asia-Pacific Region under Cedorian Leadership, promoted by Cedorian Strength of Arms.
Especially reviewing the points 4 and 6 give this impression. The DDR believes in the sovereign rights of every nation and every people, including the sovereign right of working out their problems with their neighbours on their own, maybe under mediation of another power, but not with this power playing judge, jury and executioner in one.
This, and a few other things, have me worried for the peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific Region, for not everyone will fold to the demands of the Vallen Doctrine that easily. I hope you can relieve me of my worries, especially since Staatsrat, Ministerrat and Volkskammer wish for peaceful relations to Cedoria, the Asia-Pacific Region and their wellbeing now and in the future.

I eagerly await your response.
Signed,
Generalmajor a.D. Sigmund Jähn,
Staatspräsident und Vorsitzender des Staatsrats

P.S.: Being a hegemon doesn't automatically mean being an imperialist. Being a hegemon basically means, that you are the most powerful one in a certain region - it is, what you do with your power, that determines, if you are an imperialist or not.

From: The People's Republic of Cedoria
To: The DDR

Certainly we do agree that all nations have sovereign rights, and that these rights should only be violated under exceptional circumstances. We have no qualms about you continuing to trade in Asia, nor training troops, so long as those troops do not come from a hostile state, considering you are not one, we would have no problem. Fund terrorists on the other hand, and we would have a problem.

And to be clear, this is not a hegemonic doctrine, it is a cooperative one, we seek to help the nations of the Asia-Pacific help themselves. Ultimately we are a guiding power, not a meddling one in the nations of Asia, seeking to promote a safe and harmonious environment in this region, because this is good for our own security and prosperity, as well as the security of Asia-Pacific as a whole.

We thank you for your support and hope this clears up any misunderstandings.

OOC: "Big Stick Diplomacy"

Stars and Stripes

Pacific Resolve tests OSAF Capabilities and reassures Allies in the Asia-Pacific
Josh Westman
Fairford Bureau, 4/2/15
(Image)
2 F-22As of the 8th Fighter Wing, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaskan Commonwealth taxi upon arrival at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, Japan

Operation Pacific Resolve kicked off today as 12 Theater Security Packages moved to their respective Temporary Duty Stations at multiple bases across the Asia-Pacific region. The first region-wide exercise since 1963, was hailed by PACAF Commanders as historic.

"I think we've greatly increased and were able our capabilities and were able to showcase them around the region. I'd like to thank all of our host nations and OSAF host units participating along with us in Pacific Resolve for their willingness and great hospitality, and I'm also glad that we are being given the opportunity to work with our Asian allies." Lt. Colonel Edward McManis, of the 48th Fighter Squadron, California Air National Guard, said upon arrival at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa.

F-22s from the Alaska, Virginia, and California Air National Guards and F-35s from the Arizona and Vermont Air National Guards along with support assets from the Pennsylvania, Iowa, Utah, Nevada, Oklahoma, and Oregon Air National Guards were deployed to temporarily to supplement current forces in the Region. Bases participating in the exercise are: Osan AB, Kunsan AB, Kadena AB, Misawa AB, Yokota AB, Joint Base Hickam-Pearl Harbor, Andersen AFB, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, and Clark AB. This deployment, the largest since 2003, has also been hailed by regional Allies such as the Philippines, Japan, the Taitung Islands, the Republic of China, and South Korea as a critical step in furthering the cause of regional security against what has been described as "Damaging and aggressive actions" to Peace in the Asia-Pacific region by OS diplomats. However, the President and Defense Department officials have repeatably denied that Pacific Resolve is specifically directed to any particular nation in the region.

"We will stay the course. There will be no interruption in our realignment to the Asia-Pacific." President Ellsworth said in a Press Conference early yesterday morning in Fairford when asked about the new Cedorian doctrine. The President went on to also refer to the Cedorian comments as "Destructive and Detrimental to Peace in the region".

To: President Ellsworth
From: Chairman Vallance Vallen

We are certainly disconcerted by the recent provacations of Operation Pacific Resolve, which is a thinly veiled attempt to assert OS hegemony and imperial domination over this region. This is something that the Vallen Doctrine stands against. Ultimately, Asia's problems are going to have to be resolved in Asia, by nations in the region, not by meddling outsiders.

Your actions here are needlessly provactive and harmful to peace to the Asia-Pacific region, trying to bully weaker states into submission through excessive and grandiose force of arms is unacceptable behaviour in the modern era and will not be tolerated here.

We do hope that you will reconsider your aggressive and militaristic stance against the People's Republic of Cedoria, and we are perfectly willing to act to demonstrate our own resolve should you attempt to force your ignorant world view down the throats of other nations here in violation of the Vallen Doctrine.

Ang Kasakupang Quirino sa Euro-Asya
The Federation of Malaysia
The Eurasian Quirinosphere

---

"Strong Nations, Glorious History"

---

(Image)

The prepared meeting of representatives of the nations in the Asian side of the Quirinosphere is expected to show to the world the true meaning of cooperation, power, and gratitude to the Quirinese as part of the world's ever growing international confederation of nations with forebearing importance to independence, sovereignty and self-determination through free trade, continuous military buildup for a secure Asian future and economic growth that will last for many centuries.

The leaders of the Nationalist Government of Nanjing-Republic of China, Indonesian Republic, Federation of Malaysia, Kingdom of Siam, Philippine Republic & its Indies, Empire of Japan, Empire of Korea, with Republic of East Timor, Republic of Vietnam, Kingdom of Laos,and the Kingdom of Cambodia as observer representatives to show their willingness to cooperate with the Quirinosphere. Headed by the Philippine delegation, EUAQ Summit Chairman Romualdo Galvez promised "to solidify their intent to keep the close bond between states and meddle issues diplomatically without any significant interference or unnecessary intervention, for the sake of false pretenses of progress and masking expansionist ambitions through security and goodwill." He added that "there will be no tolerance if our solid pact shall be threatened by internal or external force, as it will always retaliate with a much stronger equivalent, amounting to a hundredfold of return."

Asked about their concern in the Cedorian doctrine, he mentioned of "cooperation with each other as institutions sufficient and rightful to secure their interests within, as Asia will remain one of the best places in the world through prosperity and posterity." He added that "if ever there will be lines crossed, our military personnel will speak for themselves of this [supposed military affairs] matter." The Asian side of the EUAQ has been the bastion of supremacy of the Great Republic since, and the recent tie-up with Columbia (Organized States) for successful military initiative remains one of the hallmarks of the Quirinosphere in entertaining "guests of honor".

The EURACCOM (Eurasian Central Command) also stated their willingness to follow any necessary protocols if ever there will be "lines crossed" by the Vallen doctrine. Spokesperson Nikitin Yevgenievich, Brigadier General from the Georgian Armed Forces stated that "they will make sure continuing and existing order in the Eurasian sphere to continue regardless if there will be a ton of pages that will be published just to say they dominate clay." He added that "if they are not willing to face the real essence of the situation, which is they have less capability to strive, they better turn somewhere else or regret that they ever published such piece of paper [Vallen doctrine]." He also affirmed that Columbian military exercises and activities are undergoing to reassure that "security is still permeating in all parts of Asia." Military analysts also refreshed the history of strengthened ties of the central government with their allies in the Asia-Pacific, which is now the present-day Eurasian Sphere.

Official Cedorian Statement:

We ignore the attempt by Quirinian Fascists to show their muscle in violation of the principles of peace and cooperation expressed in the Vallen Doctrine. They have tried this before, and failed, and the actions of Imperialists such as this will not be tolerated in the Asia-Pacific by the People's Republic of Cedoria.
Any threat against the region, it's inhabitants or it's security, will be met with a full military response from the People's Republic of Cedoria. Back off from your bellicose threats, as peace is the way to prosperity here, and peace is what you are threatening.

"Those Cedorians are bluffing. It's amazing how they have the audacity and insolence to create this doctrine. But hey, everyone in the Asia-Pacific region loves to play The Big Stick Policy, but why have a big stick when you can have a sword?"

- Chief Admiral Li Yuan

Official Cedorian Statement: Why have a big stick when you can have a machine gun, a diplomat and a bushel of wheat? These twins tools, economic, diplomatic and if necessary, military will bring peace and security to the entirety of the Asia-Pacific region in cooperation and collaboration of all nations willing to participate. Certainly we are not bluffing, and if Zhouran does not believe this, then they may get an unpleasant shock if they attempt to violate the peace of Asia.

[Zhouran]

Sitting in his desk, Chief Admiral Li Yuan was laughing while watching the news about the Cedorians and their doctrine,

"Bwahahahahahaahahaha! Typical self-inflated marxists. These guys believe they're the most powerful nation in the Asia-Pacific region. Hahahahahaha! Like seriously, there are other Asian powers that are capable of turning Cedoria from a marxist hellhole into a burning hellhole.

They believe they have a prosperous economy when in fact having a socialist economy means having a centralized economy without creativity. Compare that to Zhouran, a nation with a fast-growing capitalist free-market economy. Also, our living standards are extremely high. Maybe these marxist live in low-quality apartments while their people use the lowest quality goods they make.

Not only that, but we are a militarized nation with a massive army, and we can truly overshadow those self-inflated Cedorians. If they dare to step foot on our Motherland, we will send them all to the Land of Suffering; a demonic place where these marxist scums will live in eternal chaos and misery."

[Communist Venuzaela]

Premier Chavez announces support for Vallen Doctrine
Announces 'Operation Caribbean Resolve'

Today, the recently elected Premier of the People's Republic of Venuzaela, Victor Chavez, issued a statement in support of the so-called 'Vallen Doctrine' by our Cedorian allies.

"This doctrine is a rational move for the safety and security of the Asia-Pacific" he said, "The People's Republic of Cedoria is an honourable nation which believes in the principles of equal and fair development, sovereignty and solidarity between states, and we are pleased to see these principles reflected in the doctrine."

In the second part of the Premier's speech, he also condemned the 'Operation Pacific Resolve' exercises conducted by the Organised States, declaring them to be an imperialistic and coercive attempt to dominate the Asia-Pacific, and a deliberate provocation.

Subsequently, Premier Chavez announced that the Venuzaelan People's Navy (VPN) was now mobilising to conduct it's own live-fire war game exercises in the Carribbean Sea, near the coast of Cuba. Codenamed "Operation Carribbean Resolve" it is designed to, in Premier Chavez's words "Show those nasty Yankees that if they try to dominate another region, they may find themselves bitten in the backside by a powerful foe in their own area of the world"

With most of the OS Navy deployed on the Asia-Pacific exercises, Premier Chavez also raised the possibility of an invasion of Cuba if the enemy did not refuse to stop their exercises.

"We certainly are opposed to their movements, and we are prepared to be the dog that bites the elephant if they do not call off their threats towards our ally."

Whether the Premier was joking or not is uncertain, but here's hoping the Yankees give up on their provocative actions that are a threat to peace.

[Cedoria]

Sitting in his desk, Chief Admiral Li Yuan was laughing while watching the news about the Cedorians and their doctrine,

"Bwahahahahahaahahaha! Typical self-inflated marxists. These guys believe they're the most powerful nation in the Asia-Pacific region. Hahahahahaha! Like seriously, there are other Asian powers that are capable of turning Cedoria from a marxist hellhole into a burning hellhole.

They believe they have a prosperous economy when in fact having a socialist economy means having a centralized economy without creativity. Compare that to Zhouran, a nation with a fast-growing capitalist free-market economy. Also, our living standards are extremely high. Maybe these marxist live in low-quality apartments while their people use the lowest quality goods they make.

Not only that, but we are a militarized nation with a massive army, and we can truly overshadow those self-inflated Cedorians. If they dare to step foot on our Motherland, we will send them all to the Land of Suffering; a demonic place where these marxist scums will live in eternal chaos and misery."

Private Cedorian Statement:

It may have escaped the notice of the Chief Admiral. But the Human Development Index of the People's Republic of Cedoria is higher than that of his puny nation. Also our levels of culture, income equality and environmental beauty are higher.

Most importantly in this situation, our defence force is larger and stronger, all your criticisms of the supposed failings of Cedoria do not stand up in the face of actual evidence and statistics, not that you seem to understand what these things are, but no matter.

Our defence forces are larger and stronger, try to move against us in violation of this Doctrine, and we shall crush your puny, exploited, underdeveloped nation like a boot crushes an insect.

Yours,
Chairman Vallence Vallen, People's Republic of Cedoria.

[El Cuscatlan]

OOC: Cedoria, give me your ORBAT please. Also, no shots will be fired here, as requested. Sorry for short post, not in best state of health ATM.

*** Caribbean sea

Cuscatlani RORSAT was monitoring the movement on Caribbean sea, constantly searching for the surface ships swimming around. While RORSAT was not able to distinguish between individual types of warships, when radar Operators seen the large mass of ships moving from Venezuela, everybody know what to do. Words reached the grand HQ in Santiago about 45 minutes after the communist ships left the port; and Cuscatlan, prime capitalist power in Latin America, was not going to allow communist warships swimming around and threatening it's SLOCs. At this point, everybody knew this was going to get ugly quickly; that is why Admiral Paulo Rocha Thiago, now newly promoted by Silva administration naval commander of southern Theatre of military operations (TMO) issued an WARNO to every naval battlegroup in Caribbean sea; the communists were on the move, and there was no way that Cuscatlan will allow it. At 24.00 alarms echoed on every Cuscatlani naval base on whole Costa del Sur, as the sailors were put on stand by.

A single Nihonese - made KJ 874 AWACS launched itself into air, to provide AEW capability for the fleet. The AWACS was flying slowly in the air, searching for any target that could be threat to Cuscatlani battle group. At the same time, a carrier group left the port, supporting another carrier group. At the same time, a bomber wing equipped with KH22MA was readied to ensure elimination of enemy key surface combatants.

5th Carrier Division:
1x Martinez AS
1x Juan Carlos I CV
+ 1st STVOL Squadron: 12 AE-45 Relampago
+ 1st AEW helicopter group: 4 Americanacopter Cuervo AEW
+ 1st SAR helicopter Pair: 2 Americanacopter Cuervo SAR
3x Type 45 DDG
3x Type 26 FFG
5x FREMM FFG
1x Wave AOR

5th Carrier Division:
1x Martinez AS
1x Juan Carlos I CV
+ 1st STVOL Squadron: 12 AE-45 Relampago
+ 1st AEW helicopter group: 4 Americanacopter Cuervo AEW
+ 1st SAR helicopter Pair: 2 Americanacopter Cuervo SAR
3x Type 45 DDG
3x Type 26 FFG
5x FREMM FFG
1x Wave AOR

45th Bomber Wing