Second Dhechian War (OCC)

[Holy Empire of Moltavia]

No they can be destroyed and in RL they are much to complex and unreliable for the usage my nation maintains. However all I said was torpedoes couldn't hit them. And it is true they're not in the water depending on wingspan they can be upto 50m above the water. A missile will take out a flarecraft, but launching missiles against a convoy of flarecraft while under water will use a tremendous amount of your subs air. Wing in ground effects advantage far outweigh any disadvantages IMO.

[Nicaro]

No they can be destroyed and in RL they are much to complex and unreliable for the usage my nation maintains. However all I said was torpedoes couldn't hit them. And it is true they're not in the water depending on wingspan they can be upto 50m above the water. A missile will take out a flarecraft, but launching missiles against a convoy of flarecraft while under water will use a tremendous amount of your subs air. Wing in ground effects advantage far outweigh any disadvantages IMO.

Well that's your choice, I can't control your actions xP

[Emmerian Republic]

Nicaro this was supposed to be a small rebel revolution not a nuclear biological chemical weapons holocaust. It's getting out hand and a little unbelievable that you can spare submarines to interdict shipping lanes when your facing something like four nations fleets

He's right, chemical weapons are considered WMDS and That last post about one hundred subs attacking ship lanes was god modding and you can't possibly Attack so many lanes. Regardless if there not, then your people are freakin stupid to mess with WMDs

[Nicaro]

Nicaro this was supposed to be a small rebel revolution not a nuclear biological chemical weapons holocaust. It's getting out hand and a little unbelievable that you can spare submarines to interdict shipping lanes when your facing something like four nations fleets

He's right, chemical weapons are considered WMDS and That last post about one hundred subs attacking ship lanes was god modding and you can't possibly Attack so many lanes. Regardless if there not, then your people are freakin stupid to mess with WMDs

Hmm o.0

You don't have to RP them arriving there just yet, but there's 100 submarines dispersed amongst every nation (so I guess that's like 20 per ship) and that's /really/ not that many. The main point is just to make it more expensive to do business with you, not sink tonnage. How was I godmodding?

[Emmerian Republic]

He's right, chemical weapons are considered WMDS and That last post about one hundred subs attacking ship lanes was god modding and you can't possibly Attack so many lanes. Regardless if there not, then your people are freakin stupid to mess with WMDs

Hmm o.0

You don't have to RP them arriving there just yet, but there's 100 submarines dispersed amongst every nation (so I guess that's like 20 per ship) and that's /really/ not that many. The main point is just to make it more expensive to do business with you, not sink tonnage. How was I godmodding?

You're facing at least 4-6 nations siding with at least more than 50 shipping lanes, can't handle all of them

[Nicaro]

Hmm o.0

You don't have to RP them arriving there just yet, but there's 100 submarines dispersed amongst every nation (so I guess that's like 20 per ship) and that's /really/ not that many. The main point is just to make it more expensive to do business with you, not sink tonnage. How was I godmodding?

You're facing at least 4-6 nations siding with at least more than 50 shipping lanes, can't handle all of them

Lol.

Yes, I can.

I'm not claiming to be capable of sinking millions in tonnage, all I want is to be dealing with your countries to be more expensive. Losing one extra ship out of a hundred creates a pretty big increase in insurance costs, which is pegged to the value of the goods insured. Meaning I can hit the jack pot and knock out a high value transport or I can hit something like a cotton-laden ship.

[Nicaro]

NK is going to knock everyone's satellites o.0

Sweet

[Emmerian Republic]

You're facing at least 4-6 nations siding with at least more than 50 shipping lanes, can't handle all of them

Lol.

Yes, I can.

I'm not claiming to be capable of sinking millions in tonnage, all I want is to be dealing with your countries to be more expensive. Losing one extra ship out of a hundred creates a pretty big increase in insurance costs, which is pegged to the value of the goods insured. Meaning I can hit the jack pot and knock out a high value transport or I can hit something like a cotton-laden ship.

No Offensive, but You need to rethink about your strategy because expanding your fleet across six nations to attack ship lanes means your vulnerabel for an invasion you know despite ground forces in the mainland and you've been abusing too much use of WMDs

[Nicaro]

:eyebrow:

Lol.

Yes, I can.

I'm not claiming to be capable of sinking millions in tonnage, all I want is to be dealing with your countries to be more expensive. Losing one extra ship out of a hundred creates a pretty big increase in insurance costs, which is pegged to the value of the goods insured. Meaning I can hit the jack pot and knock out a high value transport or I can hit something like a cotton-laden ship.

No Offensive, but You need to rethink about your strategy because expanding your fleet across six nations to attack ship lanes means your vulnerabel for an invasion you know despite ground forces in the mainland and you've been abusing too much use of WMDs

ICly I am going to re-think it actually but that's besides the point.

The only real cost will be attritional, actually deploying them isn't a problem.

[Nicaro]

I'm just waiting for whoever is on the beach to respond by surrendering or the chemical attacks. I believe, could be wrong, that that's Roma, emm, and moltavia??

[Valdiu]

I'm just waiting for whoever is on the beach to respond by surrendering or the chemical attacks. I believe, could be wrong, that that's Roma, emm, and moltavia??

Do you have sentries posted aboard my ships, or just have them anchored and under watch?

[New Roma Republic]

I'm just waiting for whoever is on the beach to respond by surrendering or the chemical attacks. I believe, could be wrong, that that's Roma, emm, and moltavia??

Yeah, and I have an air strike commencing on your position as a last ditch attempt to prevent the strike

[Nicaro]

I'm just waiting for whoever is on the beach to respond by surrendering or the chemical attacks. I believe, could be wrong, that that's Roma, emm, and moltavia??

Do you have sentries posted aboard my ships, or just have them anchored and under watch?

I'd have sentries, and I'd likely transfer a lot of your men to a handful of ships that your commanding officer demanded he contain captaincy over, out of courtesy. There would be sentries too, but the Valduan to sentry ratio would be laughable, since we're expecting it to be orderly and to deport you and your disarmed and salvaged ships back to your home country. I *intended* to use your vessels' ECM systems to mimic and jam the enemy while I run them with skeleton crews but I'm pretty sure I forgot to put that :'( Oh well, that's what I get for not putting up an outline xP

[Nicaro]

I'm just waiting for whoever is on the beach to respond by surrendering or the chemical attacks. I believe, could be wrong, that that's Roma, emm, and moltavia??

Yeah, and I have an air strike commencing on your position as a last ditch attempt to prevent the strike

Gotcha. You have a ground/sea based attack?

I'll be sure to put that in, but should I assume you have *not* surrendered?

[Emmerian Republic]

Yeah, and I have an air strike commencing on your position as a last ditch attempt to prevent the strike

Gotcha. You have a ground/sea based attack?

I'll be sure to put that in, but should I assume you have *not* surrendered?

Nope, he hasn't and for the record, MY fleet was engaging yours over the past 36 hours

[Nicaro]

Gotcha. You have a ground/sea based attack?

I'll be sure to put that in, but should I assume you have *not* surrendered?

Nope, he hasn't and for the record, MY fleet was engaging yours over the past 36 hours

36 o.0 I didn't think I was engaging anyone up until two hours ago. ICly the time is moving suppppeerr slow. Where is your fleet and seaborne aircraft please? (So you don't have men at the beaches?)

[Emmerian Republic]

Nope, he hasn't and for the record, MY fleet was engaging yours over the past 36 hours

36 o.0 I didn't think I was engaging anyone up until two hours ago. ICly the time is moving suppppeerr slow. Where is your fleet and seaborne aircraft please? (So you don't have men at the beaches?)

Nope, no boots on the ground, just immense naval and air power over Dhechia and the air force have reinforced the strike group in the west coast, prepared to commence assault at the port of Tonzy, Didn't you ever read my rps

[Nicaro]

36 o.0 I didn't think I was engaging anyone up until two hours ago. ICly the time is moving suppppeerr slow. Where is your fleet and seaborne aircraft please? (So you don't have men at the beaches?)

Nope, no boots on the ground, just immense naval and air power over Dhechia and the air force have reinforced the strike group in the west coast, prepared to commence assault at the port of Tonzy, Didn't you ever read my rps

I did, but I don't really remember the numbers unfortunately. Got other stuff IRL besides this RP, which I enjoy very much. But would be so kind as to give me a truncated version of your deployment/use of air and sea power please?

[Valdiu]

Do you have sentries posted aboard my ships, or just have them anchored and under watch?

I'd have sentries, and I'd likely transfer a lot of your men to a handful of ships that your commanding officer demanded he contain captaincy over, out of courtesy. There would be sentries too, but the Valduan to sentry ratio would be laughable, since we're expecting it to be orderly and to deport you and your disarmed and salvaged ships back to your home country. I *intended* to use your vessels' ECM systems to mimic and jam the enemy while I run them with skeleton crews but I'm pretty sure I forgot to put that :'( Oh well, that's what I get for not putting up an outline xP

Well, seeing as how you haven't mentioned my fleet since its surrender, I'm guessing that nothing's happened yet.

[Holy Empire of Moltavia]

Nicaro stop using chemical weapon as some instant win button. They're are big logistical and safety precautions involved with moving and implementing chemical weapons. RP properly instead of saying "ill white phosphorus you then gas you" its not that simple.

[Nicaro]

I'd have sentries, and I'd likely transfer a lot of your men to a handful of ships that your commanding officer demanded he contain captaincy over, out of courtesy. There would be sentries too, but the Valduan to sentry ratio would be laughable, since we're expecting it to be orderly and to deport you and your disarmed and salvaged ships back to your home country. I *intended* to use your vessels' ECM systems to mimic and jam the enemy while I run them with skeleton crews but I'm pretty sure I forgot to put that :'( Oh well, that's what I get for not putting up an outline xP

Well, seeing as how you haven't mentioned my fleet since its surrender, I'm guessing that nothing's happened yet.

Well I forgot, can't blame anyone else for that. But I'd post sentries, if your fleet was a far away as Korongo's it would take hours but by helicopter it's not a long trip. But however you want to go, I'm just waiting on the beach uodates

"They're are big logistical and safety precautions involved with moving and implementing chemical weapons. RP properly instead of saying "ill white phosphorus you then gas you" its not that simple."

My nation regularly uses chemical weapons, we use them to flush out rebels mainly (as I mentioned) and there's no chemical capabilities on the land yet. The marines don't have them, the paratroopers don't have them, the rebels don't have them, they're limited to the chemical stores aboard the fleet itself. That's why the artillery strike didn't work (and since most of my deployed onto the ground from ships art is both small in number and MLRSs) to stop a chemical attack.

And, in my opinion, chemicals weapons are kind of an insta-win if you're on an isolated beach, with many of your troops without even NBC suits. Like I said in my post, this chemical strike is more of a first time use benefit thing. It's effectiveness drops greatly after the first use or so.

[Marquesse]

ignore

[Holy Empire of Moltavia]

Okay is see what you're doing now, that's realistic. I simply thought all of you're formations were equipped with chemical weapons. My bad sorry, this is turning into a really good RP

Sorry for above post that's my puppet forgot I was using it

[Nicaro]

Okay is see what you're doing now, that's realistic. I simply thought all of you're formations were equipped with chemical weapons. My bad sorry, this is turning into a really good RP

Sorry for above post that's my puppet forgot I was using it

No prob. Questions are good, they clear everything up for everybody

[New Roma Republic]

Yeah, and I have an air strike commencing on your position as a last ditch attempt to prevent the strike

Gotcha. You have a ground/sea based attack?

I'll be sure to put that in, but should I assume you have *not* surrendered?

I actually have 2 attacks. 1 is ground and that is targeting your lines to try to destroy any chemical weapons. The sea based one is going after your fleet.

And yes, I have not surrendered. "Today is a good day to die!"