You have a major conflict of interest. Do you think you should?
Advertisement
by Vancouvia » Tue Oct 18, 2016 5:11 am
by Taziristan » Tue Oct 18, 2016 5:15 am
by Agadar » Tue Oct 18, 2016 6:23 am
by Pacific Peace Union » Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:06 am
by Realm of Councilry » Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:39 am
Pacific Peace Union wrote:I think it's fine for them to have a lot of power. One is the owner and the other the elected head of state. Their positions require power, and the owner (vancouvia) cannot be tyrannical as he wants the region to succeeed more than anyone, and the president would be voted out of office should he abuse his powers.
by Taziristan » Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:49 am
Pacific Peace Union wrote:I think it's fine for them to have a lot of power. One is the owner and the other the elected head of state. Their positions require power, and the owner (vancouvia) cannot be tyrannical as he wants the region to succeeed more than anyone, and the president would be voted out of office should he abuse his powers.
by Eutriston » Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:17 pm
Agadar wrote:Van, Taz, please don't continue the bickering between you lads in the convention thread. Let's try to stay on-topic.
I'd like to get back to the current item, Concerns that the President and the Founder may have too much power. Is there anyone that would like to bring forth a specific case?
@Eutriston, we passed over your laundry list of ambiguities because you weren't here to raise arguments/solutions for them when we moved to discuss it. If you want to we can reopen that item at the end of the concerns list.
by Agadar » Fri Oct 21, 2016 12:30 pm
by Agadar » Sat Oct 22, 2016 7:29 pm
by Vancouvia » Sat Oct 22, 2016 7:33 pm
Agadar wrote:We now move onto the next item: '6. With old laws being scrapped, there's no more punishments defined for specific crimes.'
Anyone care to weigh in?
by Agadar » Sun Oct 23, 2016 2:55 pm
by Taziristan » Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:10 pm
by Agadar » Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:21 pm
Taziristan wrote:Hold on, what about the assurance that people thrown off the map can appeal to get back on?
by Taziristan » Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:22 pm
by Taziristan » Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:25 pm
Taziristan wrote:You proposed something, but was it changed?
by Agadar » Sun Oct 23, 2016 4:49 pm
by Vancouvia » Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:31 pm
by Agadar » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:24 pm
Vancouvia wrote:I'll change it, we just didn't finalize any language
by Vancouvia » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:31 pm
by Agadar » Tue Oct 25, 2016 10:43 am
by Agadar » Thu Oct 27, 2016 9:41 am
by Taziristan » Thu Oct 27, 2016 9:47 am
by Vancouvia » Thu Oct 27, 2016 10:23 am
Taziristan wrote:I would like to see this defined. My personal bias is large here, but it does need to be defined. I was thinking something along the lines of this being the nation you spend most your time on, that no other nation occupied positions in other regions (government, namely), and that certain requirements of being a citizen are defined as well. For instance, posting on the RMB at least every week.
After this Constitution is ratufied, the President should also pass an EO that requires the listing of all puppets made by citizens suspected of violating the rules.
by Taziristan » Thu Oct 27, 2016 10:44 am
Vancouvia wrote:Taziristan wrote:I would like to see this defined. My personal bias is large here, but it does need to be defined. I was thinking something along the lines of this being the nation you spend most your time on, that no other nation occupied positions in other regions (government, namely), and that certain requirements of being a citizen are defined as well. For instance, posting on the RMB at least every week.
After this Constitution is ratufied, the President should also pass an EO that requires the listing of all puppets made by citizens suspected of violating the rules.
Please call them member nations instead of citizens.
An EO like that would be largely useless; the best way to find puppets is to pretend like you're not looking for them, and what would this mccarthy suspiscion list do anyway?
by Agadar » Thu Oct 27, 2016 2:25 pm
Taziristan wrote:I was thinking something along the lines of this being the nation you spend most your time on
that no other nation occupied positions in other regions (government, namely)
and that certain requirements of being a citizen are defined as well. For instance, posting on the RMB at least every week.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Amestrris, Polish Prussian Commonwealth
Advertisement