Peacekeepers (MT/OOC/OPEN)

[Kyraina]

Croker, Joseph and the Iranian are in the Kozak, Evander should be in the BTR.

[Relikai]

Guessed I missed most of the WW2 and veteran stuff *munches* altho the closest I been to real fighting (not even combat) was wargames with US Marines and Indonesian Paratroopers (Memorable), or saving a conscript from being blown up by 4kg of C3 explosives

[Greater Slavic Union]

I ned a tip (16th century warfare).

I have 103 cannons, Taborites, and an absurd ammount of cavalry.

To fight the Ottomans, is the following combination good?

1. High terrain (for artillery)
2. Moderately plain plains after the high terrain (for Taborites and Cavalry)
3. Vast spaces (for cavalry)

[Kyraina]

I ned a tip (16th century warfare).

I have 103 cannons, Taborites, and an absurd ammount of cavalry.

To fight the Ottomans, is the following combination good?

1. High terrain (for artillery)
2. Moderately plain plains after the high terrain (for Taborites and Cavalry)
3. Vast spaces (for cavalry)

Depends.

Usually that is a good combination, but the Ottomans where masters of using Gunpowder, they had decent Calvary, and had good infantry.

That's a good combination but it will boil down to numbers depending on how the Ottoman Forces look like

[Kyraina]

Guessed I missed most of the WW2 and veteran stuff *munches* altho the closest I been to real fighting (not even combat) was wargames with US Marines and Indonesian Paratroopers (Memorable), or saving a conscript from being blown up by 4kg of C3 explosives

Jesus, was he asking to become part of a outer space program?

Also how did that expertise go for ya?

[Greater Slavic Union]

I ned a tip (16th century warfare).

I have 103 cannons, Taborites, and an absurd ammount of cavalry.

To fight the Ottomans, is the following combination good?

1. High terrain (for artillery)
2. Moderately plain plains after the high terrain (for Taborites and Cavalry)
3. Vast spaces (for cavalry)

Depends.

Usually that is a good combination, but the Ottomans where masters of using Gunpowder, they had decent Calvary, and had good infantry.

That's a good combination but it will boil down to numbers depending on how the Ottoman Forces look like

It would be like Mohacs, with me having my full ranks and ore artillery (I am Hungary-Bohemia). And Poles, Austrians, and Muscoviets would join.
So... the coalition army would be like 60,000 while the Ottomans are 45,000-55,000.
And, Polish Cavalry is meant to perform raids against the Ottoman columns, targeting the artillery.

[Kyraina]

Depends.

Usually that is a good combination, but the Ottomans where masters of using Gunpowder, they had decent Calvary, and had good infantry.

That's a good combination but it will boil down to numbers depending on how the Ottoman Forces look like

It would be like Mohacs, with me having my full ranks and ore artillery (I am Hungary-Bohemia). And Poles, Austrians, and Muscoviets would join.
So... the coalition army would be like 60,000 while the Ottomans are 45,000-55,000.
And, Polish Cavalry is meant to perform raids against the Ottoman columns, targeting the artillery.

What Century is this?

I assume 12th through 19th?

[Greater Slavic Union]

It would be like Mohacs, with me having my full ranks and ore artillery (I am Hungary-Bohemia). And Poles, Austrians, and Muscoviets would join.
So... the coalition army would be like 60,000 while the Ottomans are 45,000-55,000.
And, Polish Cavalry is meant to perform raids against the Ottoman columns, targeting the artillery.

What Century is this?

I assume 12th through 19th?

It is expected that the battle occurs btween 1521 and 1530.

[Kyraina]

What Century is this?

I assume 12th through 19th?

It is expected that the battle occurs btween 1521 and 1530.

So Since your Hungry, and this is around time the Hussars are created, a elite and unconventional light Cavalry. You should have horse archers as well.

Use the Horse archers to hurras The infantry and cav of the Turks, while being harassed use the Hussars and polish heavy cav to smash into and through the shield wall.

[Greater Slavic Union]

It is expected that the battle occurs btween 1521 and 1530.

So Since your Hungry, and this is around time the Hussars are created, a elite and unconventional light Cavalry. You should have horse archers as well.

Use the Horse archers to hurras The infantry and cav of the Turks, while being harassed use the Hussars and polish heavy cav to smash into and through the shield wall.

Ok. What we were going to do was to constatly raid the ottoman columns to deprive them of their artillery, then, once in battle, place the Taborites as a bait for the ottoman cavalry, so they could come. While the Taborites retire into the Wagenburg, Polish and Hungarian cavalry would have engaged the Ottoman one. Thus, the Ottoman cavalry would have been outnumbered.
In the meanwhile, our light cavalry would have disorganized the Ottoman Infantry, previously blasted by artillery, to make it weak eough to be flanked by the Muscovite heavy infantry and to be attacked in the front by the Heavy Hungarian and Polish cavalry. The Taborites would attack from the other flank.

[Kyraina]

So Since your Hungry, and this is around time the Hussars are created, a elite and unconventional light Cavalry. You should have horse archers as well.

Use the Horse archers to hurras The infantry and cav of the Turks, while being harassed use the Hussars and polish heavy cav to smash into and through the shield wall.

Ok. What we were going to do was to constatly raid the ottoman columns to deprive them of their artillery, then, once in battle, place the Taborites as a bait for the ottoman cavalry, so they could come. While the Taborites retire into the Wagenburg, Polish and Hungarian cavalry would have engaged the Ottoman one. Thus, the Ottoman cavalry would have been outnumbered.
In the meanwhile, our light cavalry would have disorganized the Ottoman Infantry, previously blasted by artillery, to make it weak eough to be flanked by the Muscovite heavy infantry and to be attacked in the front by the Heavy Hungarian and Polish cavalry. The Taborites would attack from the other flank.

That would work. I was thinking full out battle.

[Svebia]

We may need to redeploy into Afghanistan, the mountain Tallies are getting jumpy and more courageous.

[Greater Slavic Union]

We may need to redeploy into Afghanistan, the mountain Tallies are getting jumpy and more courageous.

Or in Donbass

[Svebia]

We may need to redeploy into Afghanistan, the mountain Tallies are getting jumpy and more courageous.

Or in Donbass

I was referring to the bombing that have happened during the week.

[Kyraina]

We may need to redeploy into Afghanistan, the mountain Tallies are getting jumpy and more courageous.

While ISAF issue there, there is no point in Peacekeepers deploying to Afghanistan.

[Svebia]

We may need to redeploy into Afghanistan, the mountain Tallies are getting jumpy and more courageous.

While ISAF issue there, there is no point in Peacekeepers deploying to Afghanistan.

ISAF withdrew from Afghanistan in 2014 though.

[Greater Slavic Union]

Or in Donbass

I was referring to the bombing that have happened during the week.

Ah, sorry... (this is the moment when I would like to say myopinion, but I won't do that)

[Svebia]

I was referring to the bombing that have happened during the week.

Ah, sorry... this is the moment when I would like to say my

But right now the PK can be deployed to Chad, Nigeria, Mexico, Syria, Donbass, Crimea, and Iraq from the ongoing conflicts occurring in the region.

[Greater Slavic Union]

Ah, sorry... this is the moment when I would like to say my

But right now the PK can be deployed to Chad, Nigeria, Mexico, Syria, Donbass, Crimea, and Iraq from the ongoing conflicts occurring in the region.

To do what in Crimea?

[Svebia]

But right now the PK can be deployed to Chad, Nigeria, Mexico, Syria, Donbass, Crimea, and Iraq from the ongoing conflicts occurring in the region.

To do what in Crimea?

I would assume to possibly forcefully put Crimea back in Ukraine.

[Kyraina]

While ISAF issue there, there is no point in Peacekeepers deploying to Afghanistan.

ISAF withdrew from Afghanistan in 2014 though.

No they didn't. The name changed from ISAF to RSM (Resolute Support Mission) when OEF ended and Operation Resolute Support started up.

To do what in Crimea?

I would assume to possibly forcefully put Crimea back in Ukraine.

Russian Troops occupy Crimea. Those troops are of a sovereign nation which means that as a UNSC unit we would be launching a attack on a UNSC member. It's our job to stop terrorist, not to stop conflicts. The conflict part is part of the Peacekeeping Corp, not the Peacekeeper Anti-terrororist unit.

[Svebia]

ISAF withdrew from Afghanistan in 2014 though.

No they didn't. The name changed from ISAF to RSM (Resolute Support Mission) when OEF ended and Operation Resolute Support started up.

I would assume to possibly forcefully put Crimea back in Ukraine.

Russian Troops occupy Crimea. Those troops are of a sovereign nation which means that as a UNSC unit we would be launching a attack on a UNSC member. It's our job to stop terrorist, not to stop conflicts. The conflict part is part of the Peacekeeping Corp, not the Peacekeeper Anti-terrororist unit.

Ah, this I wasn't aware of. Thanks.

Then Crimea and Donbass are off the options.

[Greater Slavic Union]

To do what in Crimea?

I would assume to possibly forcefully put Crimea back in Ukraine.

Yeah, we would basically be giving it to people who violated their rights, and who like nazis a lot (take a look af Canal+ documentary "Ukraine: the Masques of a Revolution"). Not to mention we would have to fight against 25,000 (to the minimum, 35,000 to the max.) of the troops of the 2nd best army in the world. Not to mention their troops in Crimea have a high proportion of guards soldiers, have tanks, S-400s, S-300s, and BUK systems, other missile systems, Rocket Launchers, SPGs, and some of the best aircraft in Russia.
In case we would do this, my carachter would be out. Not only because it is impossible and suicidal, but even because he is a filo-russian.

[Svebia]

I would assume to possibly forcefully put Crimea back in Ukraine.

Yeah, we would basically be giving it to people who violated their rights, and who like nazis a lot (take a look af Canal+ documentary "Ukraine: the Masques of a Revolution"). Not to mention we would have to fight against 25,000 (to the minimum, 35,000 to the max.) of the troops of the 2nd best army in the world. Not to mention their troops in Crimea have a high proportion of guards soldiers, have tanks, S-400s, S-300s, and BUK systems, other missile systems, Rocket Launchers, SPGs, and some of the best aircraft in Russia.
In case we would do this, my carachter would be out. Not only because it is impossible and suicidal, but even because he is a filo-russian.

Bro. I don't want to start this in this thread, if you want to talk about it. TG me.

[Greater Slavic Union]

No they didn't. The name changed from ISAF to RSM (Resolute Support Mission) when OEF ended and Operation Resolute Support started up.




Russian Troops occupy Crimea. Those troops are of a sovereign nation which means that as a UNSC unit we would be launching a attack on a UNSC member. It's our job to stop terrorist, not to stop conflicts. The conflict part is part of the Peacekeeping Corp, not the Peacekeeper Anti-terrororist unit.

Ah, this I wasn't aware of. Thanks.

Then Crimea and Donbass are off the options.

I do not want to start another NSG debate but... I was not really an occupation, if it was, then Kosovo is under occupation (and I would recognize both referendums). However, Donbass can still be an option, as far as we do not fight the Ukrainian Army, but we fight the Nazi-Battalions. Oh, and the Ukrainian Army would be good too, given how Poroshenko wants to win the war (sorry, I will stop here...)