The United Holy German Reich wrote:Once I'm done my lunch I am going to make the opening post for Norman.
I already have a plan for defending the
Johnnie Cochran
Advertisement
by The United Holy German Reich » Mon May 30, 2016 9:24 am
The United Holy German Reich wrote:Once I'm done my lunch I am going to make the opening post for Norman.
by Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Mon May 30, 2016 9:26 am
by Krugeristan » Mon May 30, 2016 9:30 am
by The United Holy German Reich » Mon May 30, 2016 9:41 am
by Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Mon May 30, 2016 9:49 am
by Krugeristan » Mon May 30, 2016 9:58 am
Great Confederacy Of Commonwealth States wrote:Krugeristan wrote:
Is there anything that should be changed in the first post in the IC?
I don't think so. Well, in reality, the crimes they are accused of would fall into a few different categories for a few different courts, but like the Yugoslavia Tribunal, you can mix them all together into one big accusation. However, such an international body would not be able to demand the death penalty, especially since Russia is bound by the European Convention for Human Rights, which forbids the use of the death penalty. So, yeah, no, the post makes perfect sense, other than the death penalty bit.The United Holy German Reich wrote:Agreed.
So, what are we going to do?
by The United Holy German Reich » Mon May 30, 2016 10:04 am
Great Confederacy Of Commonwealth States wrote:Krugeristan wrote:
Is there anything that should be changed in the first post in the IC?
I don't think so. Well, in reality, the crimes they are accused of would fall into a few different categories for a few different courts, but like the Yugoslavia Tribunal, you can mix them all together into one big accusation. However, such an international body would not be able to demand the death penalty, especially since Russia is bound by the European Convention for Human Rights, which forbids the use of the death penalty. So, yeah, no, the post makes perfect sense, other than the death penalty bit.The United Holy German Reich wrote:Agreed.
So, what are we going to do?
by Krugeristan » Mon May 30, 2016 10:08 am
The United Holy German Reich wrote:Great Confederacy Of Commonwealth States wrote:I don't think so. Well, in reality, the crimes they are accused of would fall into a few different categories for a few different courts, but like the Yugoslavia Tribunal, you can mix them all together into one big accusation. However, such an international body would not be able to demand the death penalty, especially since Russia is bound by the European Convention for Human Rights, which forbids the use of the death penalty. So, yeah, no, the post makes perfect sense, other than the death penalty bit.
So, what are we going to do?
We need to show that the judges that this is a show trial and that it is hypocritical for Russia to makes these accusations since they have committed the same crimes.
by The United Holy German Reich » Mon May 30, 2016 11:09 am
Krugeristan wrote:The United Holy German Reich wrote:We need to show that the judges that this is a show trial and that it is hypocritical for Russia to makes these accusations since they have committed the same crimes.
Even if you prove Russia wrong, you'd have to dig up dirt on Syria and Jordan in order to win the whole thing.
Krugeristan wrote:The United Holy German Reich wrote:We need to show that the judges that this is a show trial and that it is hypocritical for Russia to makes these accusations since they have committed the same crimes.
Even if you prove Russia wrong, you'd have to dig up dirt on Syria and Jordan in order to win the whole thing.
by Krugeristan » Mon May 30, 2016 11:11 am
The United Holy German Reich wrote:Krugeristan wrote:
Even if you prove Russia wrong, you'd have to dig up dirt on Syria and Jordan in order to win the whole thing.
That'd be the easy part.Krugeristan wrote:
Even if you prove Russia wrong, you'd have to dig up dirt on Syria and Jordan in order to win the whole thing.
That'd be the easy part.
by The United Holy German Reich » Mon May 30, 2016 11:12 am
by The United Holy German Reich » Mon May 30, 2016 11:12 am
by The United Holy German Reich » Mon May 30, 2016 1:02 pm
by Krugeristan » Mon May 30, 2016 1:05 pm
The United Holy German Reich wrote:I just realized it's going to be hard controlling Norman and Putin...
by The United Holy German Reich » Mon May 30, 2016 1:06 pm
by The United Holy German Reich » Mon May 30, 2016 1:19 pm
by Krugeristan » Mon May 30, 2016 1:27 pm
The United Holy German Reich wrote:I'm assuming the press is allowed inside the court room?
by The United Holy German Reich » Mon May 30, 2016 1:29 pm
by Krugeristan » Mon May 30, 2016 1:33 pm
by The United Holy German Reich » Mon May 30, 2016 1:37 pm
by Krugeristan » Mon May 30, 2016 1:45 pm
by The United Holy German Reich » Mon May 30, 2016 1:55 pm
by Krugeristan » Mon May 30, 2016 1:56 pm
by Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Mon May 30, 2016 1:57 pm
The United Holy German Reich wrote:Great Confederacy Of Commonwealth States wrote:I don't think so. Well, in reality, the crimes they are accused of would fall into a few different categories for a few different courts, but like the Yugoslavia Tribunal, you can mix them all together into one big accusation. However, such an international body would not be able to demand the death penalty, especially since Russia is bound by the European Convention for Human Rights, which forbids the use of the death penalty. So, yeah, no, the post makes perfect sense, other than the death penalty bit.
So, what are we going to do?
We need to show that the judges that this is a show trial and that it is hypocritical for Russia to makes these accusations since they have committed the same crimes.
by Krugeristan » Mon May 30, 2016 1:58 pm
Great Confederacy Of Commonwealth States wrote:The United Holy German Reich wrote:We need to show that the judges that this is a show trial and that it is hypocritical for Russia to makes these accusations since they have committed the same crimes.
Hmmm, that won't fly. Even hypocrites can sue in a court of law. I think we'll need to show that international law cannot govern the internal affairs of nations, and that the defendants were acting in their national interest. So, for instance, prove that the wars were justified and that the US didn't even try to kill Assad or Khadaffi. Then, we can move that Obama is a head of state, protected under international law from international prosecution.
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Lazarian, The GAmeTopians, Untecna
Advertisement