NATION

PASSWORD

2015 (Modern world, SC-UN Resolution Thread)

For all of your non-NationStates related roleplaying needs!

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Waztaskio
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7077
Founded: Jun 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Waztaskio » Fri Feb 14, 2014 9:48 pm

OOC: I'm OP vetoing that security resolution trying to overthrow the Venezuelan government by war. The United Nations is suppose to deter war, and this would be openly violating that goal as we would encourage it. When Cuba was run by Castro, they didn't submit a proposal to try and overthrow it by war, they just let the individual countries such as the USA respond to it as they pleased. Which they tried to overthrow, but not with UN support. If you think this ruling is a bit unfair, please let me know.
Last edited by Waztaskio on Fri Feb 14, 2014 9:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Alleniana
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42880
Founded: Dec 23, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Alleniana » Fri Feb 14, 2014 10:51 pm

Waztaskio wrote:OOC: I'm OP vetoing that security resolution trying to overthrow the Venezuelan government by war. The United Nations is suppose to deter war, and this would be openly violating that goal as we would encourage it. When Cuba was run by Castro, they didn't submit a proposal to try and overthrow it by war, they just let the individual countries such as the USA respond to it as they pleased. Which they tried to overthrow, but not with UN support. If you think this ruling is a bit unfair, please let me know.

OOC: As UK, I already vetoed it for similar reasons

User avatar
Winovia
Minister
 
Posts: 2489
Founded: Nov 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Winovia » Fri Feb 14, 2014 11:13 pm

Alleniana wrote:
Waztaskio wrote:OOC: I'm OP vetoing that security resolution trying to overthrow the Venezuelan government by war. The United Nations is suppose to deter war, and this would be openly violating that goal as we would encourage it. When Cuba was run by Castro, they didn't submit a proposal to try and overthrow it by war, they just let the individual countries such as the USA respond to it as they pleased. Which they tried to overthrow, but not with UN support. If you think this ruling is a bit unfair, please let me know.

OOC: As UK, I already vetoed it for similar reasons

OOC: Its going on with or without UN support
Her Majesty Queen Sophie I | Prime Minister Michelle Harper
WinoviaGov.wi | WinoviaEmbassy.wi | WCNN.wi

User avatar
Waztaskio
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7077
Founded: Jun 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Waztaskio » Fri Feb 14, 2014 11:31 pm

Winovia wrote:
Alleniana wrote:OOC: As UK, I already vetoed it for similar reasons

OOC: Its going on with or without UN support

OOC: Idc if it goes on, you just won't have UN support. And maybe someone will post a resolution concerning the hostile actions whichever side takes.

User avatar
The Broken Russian States
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1980
Founded: Nov 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Broken Russian States » Fri Feb 14, 2014 11:35 pm

Winovia wrote:
Alleniana wrote:OOC: As UK, I already vetoed it for similar reasons

OOC: Its going on with or without UN support

OOC: If things get too hairy, I have a very legit amount of money I can fork over.
Somewhat official debating account of Roski


User avatar
Waztaskio
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7077
Founded: Jun 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Waztaskio » Sun Feb 16, 2014 6:31 pm

A message from Thailand.




Thai Department of Foreign Affairs

Image

To the International Community, ATTN ASEAN, Vietnam, Laos, United Nations

Today is a grave day for Siam, as the fraternal bonds between Thai, Cambodians and our Laotian and Vietnamese brothers was broken through the unjust use of illegal force in direct defiance of various diplomatic and wartime treaties, including the Geneva Conventions and United Nations Charter. The government of Laos, backed by Vietnamese aggressors brutishly ravaged the Thai and Cambodian border with hoards of troops and weaponry. The event began when a civilian aircraft from Kuala Lumpur to Manila via Bangkok was destroyed. It carried dozens of passengers including women and children of various ethnicities and nationalities. The blatant attempt to discredit the Thai people by murdering innocents over Thai airspace shan't be ignored. From that moment until the governments in Hanoi and Vientiane surrender to ASEAN and the Kingdom of Thailand, we the Siamese people of Thailand, Cambodia, and our ASEAN Allies (the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, Myanmar, Brunei, Singapore) are in an active state of war with the communist regimes oppressing the people of South East Asia, these regimes being those of Vietnam and Laos. We expect the nations of the world to respect Thailand's claim over these nations, as they have proven for decades they cannot be trusted. The great people of Siam will be uplifted in this war of reunification to avenge the oppressed people from the Laotian and Vietnamese aggressors. Thailand and her allies refuse to lie down and surrender, nor will we allow our enemies time to rest and prepare while their people suffer and the threat of war looms over the heads of all Asians.

As I write this, the brave men and women in the Royal Thai Armed Forces and their new Cambodian brothers and sisters are defending their homeland and people from the aggressors as we counter-invade the communist nation and decimate the horrific Laotian and Vietnamese armies. As you read his, Filipino, Malaysian and Indonesian forces are intercepting, capturing and destroying Vietnamese naval vessels. As this message resounds across the world the true and democratic people of South East Asia wage a war in the name of hope, hope for peace and prosperity in a region that had been tense and oppressed since early colonial periods. Finally, we gain the resolve to uplift our humble people to victory over tyrants and the enemies of democracy and peace. Thus we are calling for the Tyrannical Regime of Laos and their horrific puppetmasters in Vietnam to immediately surrender to the Thai people and their allies in the name of democracy and human freedom. Any attempt to resist will be met with the full strength of Thailand and her allies. Any attempts to ignore this official communiqué will result in uniform action. Any attempt to undermine or otherwise act upon this declaration in any way other an complete surrender will result in the annihilation of the Laotian and Vietnamese state and liberation of her people.

Due to the fact that the communists have committed the greatest diplomatic crime possible, we are shutting down all Laotian and Vietnamese embassies, consulates and officers in Thailand. All civilian travel between our nations henceforth ceases. Any Laotian or Vietnamese diplomatic personnel may apply for asylum under ASEAN, as their communist regimes are at fault for this travesty.

We do not wish for this war, however we will stand sentinel and fight for the freedom of the South East Asian people. There shall be no negotiations or appeasement, only surrender and prevalence of democracy and freedom.

ชาติ ศาสนา พระมหากษัตริย์


Undaunted,
Image
Minister of Foreign Affairs,
The Kingdom of Thailand, on behalf of ASEAN


Image

User avatar
Rephesus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8061
Founded: Aug 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rephesus » Sun Feb 16, 2014 9:38 pm

Image
To:
United Nations,
Security Council, United States of America



Date: July 18, 2014

United Nations Security Session


[Resolution Number:0472674]





Preamble


RECOGNIZING the blatant imperialistic and antagonistic actions of the nations of Laos and Vietnam against the people of Southeast Asia.

FURTHER REALIZING the implications of such barbaric practices in an otherwise peaceful region

APPALLED by the lack of prior judgement on the issue

ACKNOWLEDGING the quick response of the ASEAN to localize impact

DEMANDING Vietnamese and Laotian reparations

DISCREDITING the sheer existence of the Laotian and Vietnamese states

HEREBY CONDEMNS Laos and Vietnam

What you propose?


1. The United Nations condemns the government of Laos for its blatant violations of human rights and international conventions.

1a. The United Nations recognizes the claim of the Siamese people over Laos

1b. The United Nations freezes and seizes all assets of the Laotian Government

1c. The United Nations imposes trade sanctions upon the Laotian Government

1d. The United Nations recognize ASEAN's authority over the Laotian Conflict

1e. The United Nations sever all diplomatic ties with Laos


2. The United Nations condemns the government of Vietnam for its blatant violations of human rights and international conventions.

2a. The United Nations recognizes the claim of the Siamese people over Vietnam

2b. The United Nations freezes and seizes all assets of the Vietnamese Government

2c. The United Nations imposes trade sanctions upon the Vietnamese Government

2d. The United Nations recognize ASEAN's authority over the Vietnamese Conflict

2e. The United Nations sever all diplomatic ties with Vietnam


What should we expect if this is enacted?


By enacting the resolution, the United Nations further exemplifies its stance towards the preservation of human rights and sovereignty of peaceful nations while proving its utter disdain towards aggression upon sovereign states.

Furthermore, the United Nations prove their confidence in sub-global alliances such as ASEAN to avoid placing UN Troops in harms way when it is deemed unnecessary.

Signed,

Ambassador Sukhon Channary Soun
[Kingdom of Thailand]



[OOC: Edits: Changed 1 'Laotian' to 'Vietnamese', Changes second 'Recognizing' to 'Acknowledging']
Last edited by Rephesus on Sun Feb 16, 2014 9:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Alleniana
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42880
Founded: Dec 23, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Alleniana » Sun Feb 16, 2014 9:59 pm

The United Kingdom believes that the Siamese claim of its people being superior to inhabitants of Laos and Vietnam even if my implication and the further attempts at subjugation and conquest of their independent states, rather than seeking a peaceful solution in such an economically important area to be a most unsatisfactory response to the states in question's state, and hereby uses veto power in declaring its stance as nay.

User avatar
Talanzaar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1932
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Talanzaar » Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:03 pm

Italy votes Nay
Chancellor of the Region of Esamir

User avatar
Relikai
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10447
Founded: Feb 11, 2014
Moralistic Democracy

Postby Relikai » Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:15 pm

Singapore considers subjugation by an already strong nation to be overtly belligerent. However to prevent future acts of aggression as well as facilitate to union of Siam, Singapore proposes a combined democracy of SouthEast Asian leaders working well with Laotian and Vietnamese peace advocacy ministers to enter a rigid alliance and diplomatic Union in a mutual Economic and Defence sphere in SouthEast Asia.

For a nation who retains aggressive leaders will always be aggressive. This is Singapore's secondary proposal.

For the above mentioned vote, Singapore votes Nay
How to be legitimately recognised in NS? Be a proper Roleplayer.
In a community where knowledge should be used to uplift the teachable and be used as an interest instead of a necessity, the arrogant abuse of knowledge is interesting to watch.

User avatar
Rephesus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8061
Founded: Aug 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rephesus » Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:19 pm

Thailand would like to further note that the actions stated in 1a. and 2a. regarding the claim of the Siamese people is not in reference to citizens of Thailand, but rather inhabitants of Southeast Asia, as this 'claim' would result in the permission to establish a democratic government under ASEAN supervisory in Laos and Vietnam.

User avatar
Waztaskio
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7077
Founded: Jun 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Waztaskio » Sun Feb 16, 2014 11:15 pm

As the United Kingdom has voted nay, it is counted as a VETO. And the resolution is dismissed.

User avatar
Galter Gulcher
Minister
 
Posts: 3280
Founded: Sep 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Galter Gulcher » Mon Feb 17, 2014 12:36 am

Date: [July]
United Nations Security Session


[Resolution Number: 1762]





Preamble


Global Security is a international issue, that we all must work together to solve. The Turkish invasion of Bulgaria is a fine example of this, when a team of Turkish special forces invaded the Indpendent country of Bulgaria and attempted to assinate Bulgarian leaders without Decleartion of War nor with open hostility.

What you propose?


Section 1,Economic Strangulation: Enactment of Trade as well as monetary sanctions upon the Republic of Turkey.These would include a embargo and a freeze on foreign Turkish monetary assets.

Section 2,UN Condemnation: A official condemnation on the part of the United Nations against Ukraine for declaring war without a declaration of war or seeking UN Approval before conducting themselves in such manner.

What should we expect if this is enacted?


Economic and Political repercussions, resulting in a hopefully peaceful scenario when the Turkish become unable to continue waging a illegal war against the sovereign nation of Bulgaria.

Signed,

[Vitaly Churkin]
[Country Name ((EXAMPLE: Russian Federation)]
[/blocktext][/td][/table]
_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your Signature.
Screw the NSA.
I support gay marriage.
I am against Gay attitudes towards pretty much anything.
Hungary people need to just eat some endangered animals.
Mallorea and Riva should be awarded for their actions.

User avatar
Alleniana
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42880
Founded: Dec 23, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Alleniana » Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:29 am

Upon Resolution 0172, the UK abstains, as it does not support action against one member when Bulgaria was the declarant of war, and did not consult the UN or any other bodies on this. However, it is still an encouraging step towards peace, and would encourage a similar resolution directed at Bulgaria as so not to be unfair and one-sided.

Image
To:
United Nations,
Security Council, United States of America



Date: [12/7/14?]

United Nations Security Session


[Resolution Number: 0426999]





Preamble


RECOGNIZING that Southeast Asia is a region among some of the most vital due to population and economy

NOTICING that Thailand is at war with Vietnam and Laos on the pretext of invasion

SEEING that no decisive action has been taken to stop the escalating violence

BELIEVING that UN intervention may well be one of the only courses to re-establish stability

REQUESTS the world send peacekeepers under UN authority to stop the war and start negotiations, as well as to find whose fault the war was

What you propose?


1. The states of Vietnam, Thailand and Laos simultaneously withdraw all troops from their borders.

2. A force of UN peacekeepers numbered as deemed necessary upon further inspection is landed to create a demilitarized zone between the states.

3. Negotiations are entered into by all three states involved, with other powers in the region and neutral outsiders being observers.

4. A temporary ceasefire is signed by the three belligerents.

What should we expect if this is enacted?


1. Peace will be re-established in Southeast Asia.

2. The aforementioned DMZ will be removed once relations are normalized.

3. Parties will accede to negotiations' fruits as regulated by the UN.

Signed,

Prime Minister David Cameron on behalf of Queen Elizabeth II
[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland]
Last edited by Alleniana on Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:13 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Altito Asmoro
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33371
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Altito Asmoro » Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:34 am

Rephesus wrote:
To:
United Nations,
Security Council, United States of America



Date: July 18, 2014

United Nations Security Session


[Resolution Number:0472674]





Preamble


RECOGNIZING the blatant imperialistic and antagonistic actions of the nations of Laos and Vietnam against the people of Southeast Asia.

FURTHER REALIZING the implications of such barbaric practices in an otherwise peaceful region

APPALLED by the lack of prior judgement on the issue

ACKNOWLEDGING the quick response of the ASEAN to localize impact

DEMANDING Vietnamese and Laotian reparations

DISCREDITING the sheer existence of the Laotian and Vietnamese states

HEREBY CONDEMNS Laos and Vietnam

What you propose?


1. The United Nations condemns the government of Laos for its blatant violations of human rights and international conventions.

1a. The United Nations recognizes the claim of the Siamese people over Laos

1b. The United Nations freezes and seizes all assets of the Laotian Government

1c. The United Nations imposes trade sanctions upon the Laotian Government

1d. The United Nations recognize ASEAN's authority over the Laotian Conflict

1e. The United Nations sever all diplomatic ties with Laos


2. The United Nations condemns the government of Vietnam for its blatant violations of human rights and international conventions.

2a. The United Nations recognizes the claim of the Siamese people over Vietnam

2b. The United Nations freezes and seizes all assets of the Vietnamese Government

2c. The United Nations imposes trade sanctions upon the Vietnamese Government

2d. The United Nations recognize ASEAN's authority over the Vietnamese Conflict

2e. The United Nations sever all diplomatic ties with Vietnam


What should we expect if this is enacted?


By enacting the resolution, the United Nations further exemplifies its stance towards the preservation of human rights and sovereignty of peaceful nations while proving its utter disdain towards aggression upon sovereign states.

Furthermore, the United Nations prove their confidence in sub-global alliances such as ASEAN to avoid placing UN Troops in harms way when it is deemed unnecessary.

Signed,

Ambassador Sukhon Channary Soun
[Kingdom of Thailand]



[OOC: Edits: Changed 1 'Laotian' to 'Vietnamese', Changes second 'Recognizing' to 'Acknowledging']


An imperialistic attempt by a country to another country in the same region and same group. The same country that attempts to do this should care more on its domestic affairs in the election rather than trying to divert the attentions of its people to the other issue.

For this very reason, Indonesia votes Nay and demand for the mobilization of UN to cooperate with the ASEAN and together, send peacekeepers to contain this problem.
Stormwrath wrote:
Altito Asmoro wrote:You people can call me...AA. Or Alt.
Or Tito.

I'm calling you "non-aligned comrade."

A proud Nationalist
Winner for Best War RP of 2016

User avatar
The New Lowlands
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12498
Founded: Jun 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Lowlands » Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:55 am

France votes NAY on Resolution 1762, on account of Bulgaria being the military agressor and failing to seek out a diplomatic solution.

France votes AYE on Resolution 0426999.

France votes NAY on Resolution 0472674.

User avatar
Rephesus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8061
Founded: Aug 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rephesus » Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:56 am

Thailand Votes Nay on Resolution 1762

Cambodia Votes Nay on Resolution 1762

Thailand Votes Nay on Resolution 0426999 as it is ridden with false information and is being used as a false pretext for british imperialism in Southeast Asia

Cambodia Votes Nay on Resolution 0426999 as it is ridden with false information and is being used as a false pretext for british imperialism in Southeast Asia

User avatar
Alleniana
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42880
Founded: Dec 23, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Alleniana » Mon Feb 17, 2014 5:09 am

Rephesus wrote:Thailand Votes Nay on Resolution 1762

Cambodia Votes Nay on Resolution 1762

Thailand Votes Nay on Resolution 0426999 as it is ridden with false information and is being used as a false pretext for british imperialism in Southeast Asia

Cambodia Votes Nay on Resolution 0426999 as it is ridden with false information and is being used as a false pretext for british imperialism in Southeast Asia

(I'm pretty sure you can't do that)

User avatar
Rephesus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8061
Founded: Aug 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rephesus » Mon Feb 17, 2014 5:14 am

Alleniana wrote:
Rephesus wrote:Thailand Votes Nay on Resolution 1762

Cambodia Votes Nay on Resolution 1762

Thailand Votes Nay on Resolution 0426999 as it is ridden with false information and is being used as a false pretext for british imperialism in Southeast Asia

Cambodia Votes Nay on Resolution 0426999 as it is ridden with false information and is being used as a false pretext for british imperialism in Southeast Asia

(I'm pretty sure you can't do that)


(Why wouldn't I be able to do that?)

User avatar
Winovia
Minister
 
Posts: 2489
Founded: Nov 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Winovia » Mon Feb 17, 2014 5:46 am

Brazil votes NAY on 1762

Brazil votes NAY on 0426999

Bahrain votes NAY on 1762

Bahrain votes NAY on 0426999
Her Majesty Queen Sophie I | Prime Minister Michelle Harper
WinoviaGov.wi | WinoviaEmbassy.wi | WCNN.wi

User avatar
Altito Asmoro
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33371
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Altito Asmoro » Mon Feb 17, 2014 7:14 am

Alleniana wrote:Upon Resolution 0172, the UK abstains, as it does not support action against one member when Bulgaria was the declarant of war, and did not consult the UN or any other bodies on this. However, it is still an encouraging step towards peace, and would encourage a similar resolution directed at Bulgaria as so not to be unfair and one-sided.

To:
United Nations,
Security Council, United States of America



Date: [12/7/14?]

United Nations Security Session


[Resolution Number: 0426999]





Preamble


RECOGNIZING that Southeast Asia is a region among some of the most vital due to population and economy

NOTICING that Thailand is at war with Vietnam and Laos on the pretext of invasion

SEEING that no decisive action has been taken to stop the escalating violence

BELIEVING that UN intervention may well be one of the only courses to re-establish stability

REQUESTS the world send peacekeepers under UN authority to stop the war and start negotiations, as well as to find whose fault the war was

What you propose?


1. The states of Vietnam, Thailand and Laos simultaneously withdraw all troops from their borders.

2. A force of UN peacekeepers numbered as deemed necessary upon further inspection is landed to create a demilitarized zone between the states.

3. Negotiations are entered into by all three states involved, with other powers in the region and neutral outsiders being observers.

4. A temporary ceasefire is signed by the three belligerents.

What should we expect if this is enacted?


1. Peace will be re-established in Southeast Asia.

2. The aforementioned DMZ will be removed once relations are normalized.

3. Parties will accede to negotiations' fruits as regulated by the UN.

Signed,

Prime Minister David Cameron on behalf of Queen Elizabeth II
[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland]

Indonesia votes ABSTAIN
Stormwrath wrote:
Altito Asmoro wrote:You people can call me...AA. Or Alt.
Or Tito.

I'm calling you "non-aligned comrade."

A proud Nationalist
Winner for Best War RP of 2016

User avatar
Talanzaar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1932
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Talanzaar » Mon Feb 17, 2014 9:20 am

Italy changes its vote on resolution 0472674 to ABSTAIN
Chancellor of the Region of Esamir

User avatar
Ptolemais
Minister
 
Posts: 3366
Founded: Apr 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ptolemais » Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:00 pm

Japan votes YEA on UK resolution 0426999 in regards to the South-East Asia conflict. Japan is willing to commit a significant amount of impartial peacekeepers to prevent the two sides from fighting until negotiations can be concluded. We would also like to see peacekeepers from China and South Korea present as well, to ensure neutrality. This resolution should be adopted forthwith as it is the best immediate solution to the bloodshed currently occurring.
CURRENT:
N/A

FORMER:
Scandinavian Union in 1992 Modern Scenario (http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=295466) [Co-OP]
Japan in 2016 Modern World RP (http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=283184) [Co-OP]
Canada in 2014 Real World RP (http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=272910)
Great Shogunate of Japan in 1914 AH RP - The Great War (http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=287302)
Orb Union in Pandyssia, Blood and Iron (http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=289399)
LIKES: Secularism, Meritocracy, Technocracy, Aristocracy, Constitutional Monarchy
DISLIKES: Militant Atheism, Fundamentalism, Radical Feminism, Plutocracy, Communism

User avatar
Graknopia
Minister
 
Posts: 3244
Founded: Dec 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Graknopia » Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:34 pm

"The Chinese government votes Nay on resolution 0426999, stating that Thailand should handle self-defense. However, China will gladly support peacetalks in Hong-kong"
Last edited by Graknopia on Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2% of all Internet users would cry if Facebook broke down. If you are part of that 98% who simply would sit back and laugh, copy and paste this into your sig.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Portal to the Multiverse

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bentus, Cylarn, Ormata, Sao Nova Europa

Advertisement

Remove ads