Advertisement
by Rephesus » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:13 pm
by Roski » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:15 pm
Rephesus wrote:The Bruneian delegation spoke,
Although Morocco was clearly defeated in the conflict, we like to the the world is beyond the point where barbaric militarism can result in annexation of sovereign land. The land stolen by Spain in its militaristic 'treaty' was never and should never be the property of Madrid. The people of Morocco rightfully own such land and blatant imperialism needs to be punished, not rewarded. Additionally, it is unclear of whom the aggressor was as Spain did not allow the UN to investigate, and Morocco spoke no opposition, thus it is not difficult to conclude that there were clear motives behind the Spanish invasion. The Spanish government has no right to steal Moroccan land or displace its citizens, such imperialistic acts go against the very foundations of this assembly.
by Ptolemais » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:19 pm
Roski wrote:
Morocco invaded Spanish territory. What of the cold war, where the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom split Europe in half, without consulting the other victors, or the nations they just liberated from Nazi rule?
by Forty Twoania » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:35 pm
Rephesus wrote:The Bruneian delegation spoke,
Although Morocco was clearly defeated in the conflict, we like to the the world is beyond the point where barbaric militarism can result in annexation of sovereign land. The land stolen by Spain in its militaristic 'treaty' was never and should never be the property of Madrid. The people of Morocco rightfully own such land and blatant imperialism needs to be punished, not rewarded. Additionally, it is unclear of whom the aggressor was as Spain did not allow the UN to investigate, and Morocco spoke no opposition, thus it is not difficult to conclude that there were clear motives behind the Spanish invasion. The Spanish government has no right to steal Moroccan land or displace its citizens, such imperialistic acts go against the very foundations of this assembly.
by Rephesus » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:39 pm
by Forty Twoania » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:54 pm
Rephesus wrote:The Burmese delegate spoke,
By the same definition, sir, one could justify the Soviet occupation of various eastern dictatorships. By refusing the proposal that has the interests of both the Spanish and Moroccan, -including Sahrawi- peoples in mind, Madrid shows its refusal to give up land that rightfully belongs to the people of Morocco.
by Rephesus » Wed Mar 26, 2014 4:05 pm
by Forty Twoania » Wed Mar 26, 2014 4:08 pm
Rephesus wrote:Forty Twoania wrote:Spain wishes to remind Laos that the Sahrawi people have been oppressed by Morocco for over 20 years after Spain's withdrawal from the region and that the Sahrawi Republic is a Republic not a puppet they are free to elect their own government.
Spain's annexed territory is minuscule and has little economic value it was only ceded to insure the protection of both Ceuta and Melilla, which was occupied by Moroccan forces
The War started when Morocco attempted to annex the Spanish Island of Perejil throughout the war no Spanish troops occupied Morocco
The Vietnamese delegation responds,
The delegation from Vietnam would like to remind Spain that the oppression of a peoples such as those in Catalonia does not and never will justify the invasion of a territory and so called 'liberation' simply for the establishment of a puppet state loyal to Madrid.
We would also like to remind the Spanish delegation that all annexed territory belongs to the people of Morocco and it is their right to govern their own territory, not that of Madrid Bureaucrats and Oil Barons.
We would also like to remind Spain that due to the veto of the resolution for a UN investigation of the war, Spain's analysis on the catalyst for the war cannot officially be recognized by the United Nations and would like to further remind Spain that Morocco currently does not claim the island as its own following the treaty Fez was forced to sign at Spanish Gunpoint.
The use of a superior military to bully a nation of lesser economic standing into submission disgusts the Vietnamese delegation and furthermore we would like to voice our discontent to the Spanish delegation for attempting to legitimize such a brutal conflict which resulted in so many civilian casualties.
by Forty Twoania » Wed Mar 26, 2014 4:13 pm
Rephesus wrote:Burma would like to clarify that the Burmese delegation never made a comparison to the Nazi invasion of Europe.
The Vietnamese delegation would like to reiterate that this land belongs to the Moroccan people and Spain had no right to annex it. Additionally We would like to enquire as to how far Spain will go to ensure 'security'. The end of the conflict assured the security of Ceuta and Melilla and thus there is and never will be a need to annex the land of a sovereign nation for personal desire.
by Graknopia » Wed Mar 26, 2014 4:16 pm
Forty Twoania wrote:Rephesus wrote:Burma would like to clarify that the Burmese delegation never made a comparison to the Nazi invasion of Europe.
The Vietnamese delegation would like to reiterate that this land belongs to the Moroccan people and Spain had no right to annex it. Additionally We would like to enquire as to how far Spain will go to ensure 'security'. The end of the conflict assured the security of Ceuta and Melilla and thus there is and never will be a need to annex the land of a sovereign nation for personal desire.
We apologize for the miscommunication that statement is direct at Laos
The Fall of Melilla proved that putting Melilla back in its original territorial position would threaten its security as it has already been proved that it is undefendedable. Ceuta wasnt occupied but it would have been if the war had continued. The end of one war doesn't mean the end of all wars
by Galter Gulcher » Wed Mar 26, 2014 5:15 pm
by Graknopia » Wed Mar 26, 2014 5:28 pm
Galter Gulcher wrote:Russia vetoes Resolution:056849
by Graknopia » Wed Mar 26, 2014 5:50 pm
To: United Nations, Security Council, United States of America Date: [Insert Date] United Nations Security Session [Resolution Number:(0-56850)] Preamble [The removal of the Russian Federation from permanent UN Security Council Seat.] What you propose? 1.) Russian Belligerence A. The Russian Federation shows continued aggression towards European and Asian nations alike B. The Russian Federation has no regard for the world economy, nor the regard for the safety of civilians C. The Russian Federation's continued support for terrorists in Ukraine. 2.) Russian Economy A. The Russian economy cannot feasibly support itself internally at this point along with the continued upkeep of its armed forces B. A large scale mobilization would further cripple its economy 3.) Political Leaders A. Noting that the majority of Russian leaders have no regard for human life and the stability of the economy, as shown in part 1 B. Russian President Vladimir Putin is unfit to lead a country, and continues to undermine UN efforts to bring peace and security to the world C. Noting that the Russian Federation is the most corrupt country of the UN SC members, citing the most recent events at the Olympics of Putin handing out political favors to wealthy businessmen. What should we expect if this is enacted? [Hereby removes the Russian Federation as a permanent UN Security Council Member.] Signed, [Insert your Name] [People's Republic of China] |
by Hobbesistan » Wed Mar 26, 2014 5:56 pm
by Galter Gulcher » Wed Mar 26, 2014 5:57 pm
by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Wed Mar 26, 2014 5:58 pm
by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:00 pm
by Graknopia » Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:20 pm
Waztaskio wrote:Kurdistan has now be given observer status in the United Nations SC, due to no real opposition.
by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:21 pm
Waztaskio wrote:Kurdistan has now be given observer status in the United Nations SC, due to no real opposition.
by Galter Gulcher » Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:21 pm
Waztaskio wrote:Kurdistan has now be given observer status in the United Nations SC, due to no real opposition.
by Ptolemais » Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:36 pm
by Columbion » Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:42 pm
Waztaskio wrote:Never mind then, Kurdish is denied from observer status mainly due to China.
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Britanania, Mortasheen
Advertisement