2015 (Modern world, SC-UN Resolution Thread)

by **Alleniana** » Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:39 pm

by **Sirlya** » Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:17 pm

To:
United Nations,
Security Council, United States of America

Date: [6/2/14]

United Nations Security Session

[Resolution Number: 0427000]

Preamble

With the on going conflict in the North Kivu region of the Democratic Republic of Congo, and constant fighting from rebels in that area. Lives are being lost over bloody conflict that has been ravaging the tumultuous region since 2007. The Democratic Republic of Congo's military is incapable of resolving this conflict on it's own, and with rebels showing no intents of political resolution, we ask for intervention from the United Nations in order to keep peace and stability in the central African region.

What you propose?

1. United Nations peacekeeping in the North Kivu region in the Democratic Republic of Congo to help resolve the conflict, and keep stability within the DRC.

2. A United Nations fighting force be deployed to help the Democratic Republic of Congo's military combat insurgents in the region, and protect civilian casualties.

3. Medical and food aid be sent to the Democratic Republic of Congo's Kivu region to be given to the injured victims of rebel attacks in Kivu.

What should we expect if this is enacted?

The United Nations can expect to see vast improvement in the quality of life in the Democratic Republic of Congo, as the rebels in the region are responsible for human trafficking, kidnapping, possible slavery, sexual violence, and having child soldiers. The DRC is pouring countless amounts of money into military operations that could be used on other things such as improving the education, and healthcare systems of the Congo. You can expect a more stable and peaceful Congo with the passage of this resolution.

Signed,

Joseph Kabila
Democratic Republic of Congo

by **Talanzaar** » Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:19 pm

Italy votes AYE on resolution 0427000

by **Rephesus** » Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:25 pm

Thailand votes AYE on resolution 0427000

Cambodia votes AYE on resolution 0427000

Additionally, Thailand would like to state that it is relieved that the DRC is actively taking steps to further world peace, as Thailand itself is doing. Should this continue Thailand would like to suggest a possible commendation of the DRC's UN Delegation.

by **The Broken Russian States** » Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:26 pm

Germany votes Aye on the resolution 0427000

by **Alleniana** » Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:31 pm

Uk votes aye on Resolution 0427000, believing that further stability, along with the settling down of things in Somalia could help end the cycle of revolution and famine that has plagued Africa.

by **The New Lowlands** » Fri Feb 21, 2014 12:14 am

France votes AYE on Resolution 0427000.

by **Kryskov** » Fri Feb 21, 2014 5:43 pm

by **Kranstentistan** » Fri Feb 21, 2014 6:13 pm

India votes Aye on the resolution 0427000

by **Graknopia** » Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:29 pm

"China votes yay on resolution 0427000"

by **Rephesus** » Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:56 pm

To:
United Nations,
Security Council, United States of America

Date: July 18, 2014

United Nations Security Session

[Resolution Number:045454545]

Preamble

RECOGNIZING the devastating conflict endangering the lives of the peoples of Southeast Asia.

FURTHER REALIZING the lack of sensitivity towards the situation by foreign powers

NOTICING the lack of focus on humanitarian aid and civil support

ACKNOWLEDGING the upbringing of the Laotian Constitutional Monarchy's proposition to focus on rebuilding

FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGING the refusal of the Communist Party of Vietnam to attend negotiations of any sort

DEMANDING all involved combatants contribute to humanitarian aid efforts in Southeast Asia

What you propose?

1. The United Nations will proactively work with Southeast Asian nations to bring aid to suffering people

1a. The United Nations shall henceforth establish the United Nations Southeast Asian Relief Committee [UNSEARC]

I. UNSEARC shall be protected by the host country and is not to be fired upon under any circumstances

II. UNSEARC shall be provided monetary contributions from South and East Asian nation's budgets in order to assist in funding aid efforts

III. UNSEARC shall be deployed only to secure zones following the end of conflict

2. The United Nations will recognize the independent Constitutional Monarchy presiding over The Sovereign Kingdom of Laos

3. The United Nations shall impose sanctions on any combatant government that does not consent to attending UN sponsored negotiations within 1 weeks time from resolution inaction

3a. The United Nations shall have a present delegation at all negotiations, deemed The United Nations Southeast Asian Delegation [UNSEAD]

I. UNSEAD shall speak on behalf of the Secretary General of the United Nations

I. UNSEAD shall focus on ensuring a peaceful resolution resulting in demilitarization of all involved parties, focus on creating and preserving democratic values and structures

3b. The United Nations will work to ensure a democratic and humanitarian-friendly solution to the conflict

What should we expect if this is enacted?

By enacting the resolution, the United Nations exemplifies its stance towards the preservation of sovereignty of peaceful nations.

Furthermore, the United Nations prove their unwavering dedication to the emphasis of human rights and life.

Signed,

Ambassador Sukhon Channary Soun
[Kingdom of Thailand]

[Prime Minister David Cameron]
[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland]

[Ambassador Dara Dương Phan]
[Sovereign Kingdom of Laos]

[Edits: 1. Appalled changed to Noticing, 2. Removed '0.1% of GDP]
[OOC Notes: This is subject to change, so if you are going to vote Nay, please state what you want changed. This was written by me and reviewed by Allen]

by **Rephesus** » Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:57 pm

Cambodia votes AYE on Resolution 045454545

by **Alleniana** » Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:59 pm

Upon Resolution 045454545, the UK abstains, being as it is that it is not as neutral as hoped, but a decent step in the right sort of direction.

by **The Broken Russian States** » Sat Feb 22, 2014 12:01 am

Germany and Austria vote Aye on resolution 045454545

by **Graknopia** » Sat Feb 22, 2014 12:09 am

"In regards to resolution 045454545, the Chinese government votes Yay"

by **Kryskov** » Sat Feb 22, 2014 12:10 am

Vietnam naturally votes NAY on Resolution 045454545 and would also like to clarify to both the British and German delegations that in the preamble, Mr. Phan stated:

FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGING the refusal of the Communist Party of Vietnam to attend negotiations of any sort

This is a foolish case of propaganda against the Vietnamese people and government. Vietnam has not been stubborn in its attempt to find peaceful solutions. We reiterate that although we have not offered peace conferences ourselves, neither has Thailand or any other ASEAN members. We also wish that Article 2 of the Resolution be stricken down, since the UN has recognized the Communist Party of Laos as the ruling, legitimate party of Laos.

Furthermore, we would like this resolution to be tabled for discussion before being brought to a vote.

by **Holy Church of Land and Sea** » Sat Feb 22, 2014 1:05 am

The North Korean Diplomat Sin Son-ho, stands and begins to address the United Nations.

"North Korea wants to finally establish better relations on the International Stage, by allowing the United Nations to send inspectors to our Nuclear Plants, and pledging to stop any further testing of Nuclear Weapons if all the United Nations resolutions are lifted. We wish to encourage economic growth within our country, and we do not wish to further de-benefit ourself on the International scale. As to the current resolutions being voted on, we would like to Abstain from those in the meantime, but we will publicly announce our support for Vietnam, just without troop involvement."

by **Alleniana** » Sat Feb 22, 2014 3:16 am

Most surprised, the UK congratulated North Korea on taking moves to move away from its current state, and welcomes its UN involvement and normalization of relations with the rest of the world. It ask all the nations to be receptive and encouraging of North Korea in its political movements here.

by **Rephesus** » Sat Feb 22, 2014 6:15 am

Kryskov wrote:Vietnam naturally votes NAY on Resolution 045454545 and would also like to clarify to both the British and German delegations that in the preamble, Mr. Phan stated:
FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGING the refusal of the Communist Party of Vietnam to attend negotiations of any sort

This is a foolish case of propaganda against the Vietnamese people and government. Vietnam has not been stubborn in its attempt to find peaceful solutions. We reiterate that although we have not offered peace conferences ourselves, neither has Thailand or any other ASEAN members. We also wish that Article 2 of the Resolution be stricken down, since the UN has recognized the Communist Party of Laos as the ruling, legitimate party of Laos.

Furthermore, we would like this resolution to be tabled for discussion before being brought to a vote.

Thailand, Cambodia and Laos dismiss these false claims. ASEAN has offered negotiations in nations such as Malaysia, Singapore and Myanmar prior to their direct involvement multiple times. We have never received a response from the Communist Party of Vietnam, however we have received responses from various other groups in Vietnam.

Additionally, following the surrender of the Communist Party of Laos in Vientiane the Royal Laotian Government was voted to become the Government of Laos, the Royal Family in Laos has had a legitimate claim since the Vietnamese-backed military coup that illegally assassinated multiple government figured during the Cold War.

The people of Laos have spoken and ask merely for the United Nations to hear their plea.

by **Sirlya** » Sat Feb 22, 2014 9:41 am

The delegation from the Democratic Republic of Congo stood up, after reading over resolution 045454545, he had some problems with it.

"In regards to resolution number 045454545, specifically parts "I, II, III" under section "1a". How will we know the proposed "UNSEARC" will be efficiently and willingly protected by the host nation? If they don't protect us, there really is no secure zone as stated in "III". Even if there was, the zone could still be attacked by radical nationals who were fighting in the war. It seems to me, that if we were to select a host country, it would have to be in a bordering country.

In part "II", this resolution is forcing Southeast nations to take out of their own budget, to give to the U.N to fund what could be an unwanted programs. Those funds could be used to be placed into more proactive things such as education, social programs, and healthcare." The Congolese delegate stated, his skepticism on this section was evident as it didn't make much of any sense to him why the U.N would force a country to host them, fund them, and then secure them all at the same time when the U.N could do this for itself.

"With that said however, I applaud the efforts made by this resolution to help find peace in Southeast Asia" The delegate finished before taking his seat.

by **Rephesus** » Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:13 am

The Delegate from Thailand stood, addressing the Congolese.

"Thank you for your concern, delegate, the Kingdom of Thailand greatly appreciates your recognition of our efforts. In deference to the UNSEARC, as a UN mandated organization, the UN Recognized government would be obliged to accommodate the humanitarian force. Should they request the UN Peacekeepers be used instead, they may. As for secure zones, the United Nations would measure the tactical risk of hosting humanitarian programmes in the aforementioned area, on a case-by-case measure.

As for part II, I personally believe that using the funds to save what may soon be millions of lives and would only be marginal in terms of GDP Percentage is far more proactive than social programs, atleast until the minimum standard of aid is achieved.

Did you have any suggestions for editing to the proposal, delegate?" And with that he sat.

by **Kryskov** » Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:40 am

The Socialist Republic of Vietnam would like to invite a neutral UN investigation to hear our investigative reports on the rebellion resulting in the violation of Thailand's integrity and that members of the Chief of Staff acted against the wishes of the government.

by **Rephesus** » Sat Feb 22, 2014 11:06 am

The Kingdom of Thailand would like to request a UN sanctioned trial of the Communist Party of Vietnam's leaders for crimes against humanity and state. We would also like to ask a UN investigations group to look into the Vietnamese-backed genocide against the Hmong people of Laos and Vietnam.

The Kingdom of Laos would like to request a UN investigation into the legitimate evidence and testimonies of the actions of the Communist Parties of Vietnam and Laos. The evidence was found in legitimate military communication channels during the ASEAN liberation of Vientiane. Some evidence includes the testimonies of various high ranking officials to the intents of the Communist Parties against a plethora of other states, along with records of the Hmong Genocide.

by **Kryskov** » Sat Feb 22, 2014 11:23 am

Rephesus wrote:The Kingdom of Thailand would like to request a UN sanctioned trial of the Communist Party of Vietnam's leaders for crimes against humanity and state. We would also like to ask a UN investigations group to look into the Vietnamese-backed genocide against the Hmong people of Laos and Vietnam.

The Kingdom of Laos would like to request a UN investigation into the legitimate evidence and testimonies of the actions of the Communist Parties of Vietnam and Laos. The evidence was found in legitimate military communication channels during the ASEAN liberation of Vientiane. Some evidence includes the testimonies of various high ranking officials to the intents of the Communist Parties against a plethora of other states, along with records of the Hmong Genocide.

The Laos delegation may get what they wish, but the UN will find nothing of Vietnamese cooperation in any sort of genocide, nor will they find any correspondence regarding troop movements that are reliable and not from war exercises.

by **Holy Church of Land and Sea** » Sat Feb 22, 2014 11:48 am

To:
United Nations,
Security Council, United States of America

Date: [Insert Date]

United Nations Security Session

[Resolution Number:(061584)]

Preamble

North Korea is wanting to encourage economic development inside the country, by complying with some of the previous U.N. resolutions made against it.

What you propose?

Section I (Goals)

1.The North Korean government shall allow U.N. inspectors into the country, to verify the existence
of our Nuclear Aresonal and all other weapons that they may want to inspect.

2. The North Korean Government will stop all further Nuclear Testing, and give itself to the Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Section 2 (Expected Actions)
1. In regards for stopping of our Nuclear Program, we wish for Resolutions 1695,1718,1874,1928,1985 to be declared null as we would be complying with the acts stated for the removal of the blockades.

2. Wish for the world to open trade negotiations with North Korea, and help it modernize to South Korean levels.

What should we expect if this is enacted?

If this is enacted, the North Korean government will be opening up a little to the International Community, as we have ignored our economy for far to long, and if our economy stops working one day due to little output, we will have most of our country dieing of Sickness which is something our government will not have the resources to address. We hope the United Nations will accept this, and further economic cooperation with us can happen.

Signed,

Sin Son-ho
Democratic People's Republic of Korea

2015 (Modern world, SC-UN Resolution Thread)

Who is online