AETEN II wrote:Bone Fort wrote:You mean how Charles Julius Guiteau killed him.
*begins waiting for response about crackpot conspiracy*
No, Edison didn't wash his hands while operating on Garfield using some sort of scanner (forget what is was exactly, think it was a metal detector), to locate the bullet and physically shoved his fingers into Garfield's body. He would have survived the bullet. It was the infection he got from Edison (most likely) that killed him.
Edison didn't operate on Garfield. He devised a metal detector but the metal bed prohibited the device from working properly. Garfield's doctors probed the wound without any regard to sanitary conditions (it wasn't accepted practice back then) and the probing created new channels for bacteria to build up. They actually probed in the wrong direction, if I remember right, and poked a hole in his liver. Anyway, the corroding bullet mixed with the introduction of bacteria are what finally took their toll. A ruptured splenic artery aneurysm following a long period of pneumonia and sepsis.