Advertisement
by Atlanticatia » Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:26 am
The Sarian wrote:Why is the Prime Minister anti-sugar but pro-cannabis?
by Costa Fierro » Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:32 am
Atlanticatia wrote:"Also, in a region like ours, taking the drug away from the cartels makes sense."
by Atlanticatia » Tue Jul 07, 2015 3:03 am
Costa Fierro wrote:Atlanticatia wrote:"Also, in a region like ours, taking the drug away from the cartels makes sense."
"Except that it would not be taking the drug away from the cartels," Campos said. "Because Calaverde, and Central America as a whole, is not the primary market for cocaine coming from Peru and Bolivia. We are merely a transit nation and I believe that this bill does absolutely nothing to address the nature of the drug industry in Calaverde."
by New Werpland » Tue Jul 07, 2015 4:13 am
by Bulgislavia » Tue Jul 07, 2015 4:35 am
by Davincia » Tue Jul 07, 2015 5:47 am
by The Sarian » Tue Jul 07, 2015 7:29 am
Davincia wrote:"As long as we're taxing it to kingdom come, I have no problem. Although I am personally against the use of most recreational drugs, cannabis is fortunately among the less-damaging variants."
by Ainin » Tue Jul 07, 2015 8:10 am
The Sarian wrote:"In the same way pistols are a less damaging variant of firearm" Matilde muttered, hoping it wasn't picked up by Boris Johnsons magic microphones.
by Davincia » Tue Jul 07, 2015 8:18 am
The Sarian wrote:"I motion we celebrate that order with a hip-hip-huzzah."
by Britanno 2 » Tue Jul 07, 2015 8:55 am
by The Sarian » Tue Jul 07, 2015 9:05 am
Britanno 2 wrote:"While there are undoubtedly many flaws with this bill, it is better than having no regulation at all. I also challenge the Leader of the Opposition to set out how we could possible limit the use of cannabis even when it is illegal? Criminalising cannabis doesn't work, at least this way we can regulate and make it safer for all those involved."
by Zurkerx » Tue Jul 07, 2015 9:21 am
The Sarian wrote:Britanno 2 wrote:"While there are undoubtedly many flaws with this bill, it is better than having no regulation at all. I also challenge the Leader of the Opposition to set out how we could possible limit the use of cannabis even when it is illegal? Criminalising cannabis doesn't work, at least this way we can regulate and make it safer for all those involved."
"Sweden increased the war on drugs and has seen a great drop in the number of drug abuse cases."
by The Sarian » Tue Jul 07, 2015 9:56 am
Zurkerx wrote:The Sarian wrote:"Sweden increased the war on drugs and has seen a great drop in the number of drug abuse cases."
"Sweden is a much smaller country with a population of roughly 10 million people. It can get cold up there so don't go there by the way. Personally, I don't have a problem with cannabis or any drug really. Cannabis has not killed anyone by my knowledge."
by Skeckoa » Tue Jul 07, 2015 9:59 am
by Prussia-Steinbach » Tue Jul 07, 2015 10:01 am
The Sarian wrote:"Sweden increased the war on drugs and has seen a great drop in the number of drug abuse cases."
by Prussia-Steinbach » Tue Jul 07, 2015 10:05 am
Skeckoa wrote:a year of rehabilitation for possession is just overkill, and sounds expensive. Fines, or even just points on a record seem sufficient.
by Ikania » Tue Jul 07, 2015 10:13 am
The Sarian wrote:Britanno 2 wrote:"While there are undoubtedly many flaws with this bill, it is better than having no regulation at all. I also challenge the Leader of the Opposition to set out how we could possible limit the use of cannabis even when it is illegal? Criminalising cannabis doesn't work, at least this way we can regulate and make it safer for all those involved."
"Sweden increased the war on drugs and has seen a great drop in the number of drug abuse cases."
by Zurkerx » Tue Jul 07, 2015 10:16 am
The Sarian wrote:Zurkerx wrote:
"Sweden is a much smaller country with a population of roughly 10 million people. It can get cold up there so don't go there by the way. Personally, I don't have a problem with cannabis or any drug really. Cannabis has not killed anyone by my knowledge."
"The difference between ten and twelve million people, population wise, is very little."
by Prussia-Steinbach » Tue Jul 07, 2015 10:37 am
Zurkerx wrote:"True, it is little difference. However, as other colleagues here have pointed out, the cartels do go through this nation; carrying with them drugs and such. While I may not agree with every single provision of the bill, regulating Cannabis is a start. It should be legal, and it will become legal."
by Britanno 2 » Tue Jul 07, 2015 11:03 am
The Sarian wrote:Why is the Prime Minister anti-sugar but pro-cannabis?
by Davincia » Tue Jul 07, 2015 12:20 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Zurkerx wrote:"True, it is little difference. However, as other colleagues here have pointed out, the cartels do go through this nation; carrying with them drugs and such. While I may not agree with every single provision of the bill, regulating Cannabis is a start. It should be legal, and it will become legal."
"Exactly, my friend. The intricacies can be worked out another day, in another bill. This act is enough to provide a baseline effort to begin medical usage and safe, legal cultivation of the cannabis plant. I refuse to stand idly by while criminal kingpins sit around and profit off of one man's wish to burn and inhale a natural product."
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement