NSG Senate General Discussion Thread (Former Lobby)

[Dragomerian Islands]

(Image)

The next ball is B3

[CTALNH]

Let's get rid of the current admins and replace them with CTALNH, RSSS, Kam, and Drago.

Yeah! Oh wait...

Apparently jokes aren't for you.

[The Nihilistic view]

(Image)

Nowhere to run to baby. Nowhere to hide....................

[Dragomerian Islands]

Yeah! Oh wait...

Apparently jokes aren't for you.

I think that it is a good idea!

[CTALNH]

Apparently jokes aren't for you.

I think that it is a good idea!

Truthfully speaking as much as we could fuck around I bet my assignment that we would be better mods than the ones now.

[Office of the Leishaagen Coroner]

(Image)

Hey, who stole my job?

[Ainin]

Yeah! Oh wait...

Apparently jokes aren't for you.

Apparently reading comprehension isn't for you.

[CTALNH]

Apparently jokes aren't for you.

Apparently reading comprehension isn't for you.

Apparently your sarcasm was stupid and I choose to ignore it.

[The Neo-Confederate States of America]

Apparently reading comprehension isn't for you.

Apparently your sarcasm was stupid and I choose to ignore it.

Apparently knowing when you need to shut up isn't for you.

[The New World Oceania]

Is there anyone who legitimately supports returning to Aurentina?

[New Bierstaat]

Is there anyone who legitimately supports returning to Aurentina?

I like it in theory, but in practice, it would probably result in the death of the Senate again since there's not really much new to legislate.

I believe Ainin and a few others also want to go back there.

I've been thinking more about either Vestmark or the blank slate.

[CTALNH]

Apparently your sarcasm was stupid and I choose to ignore it.

Apparently knowing when you need to shut up isn't for you.

Apparently I call upon Ainin to use the NSG warning system on you,

[CTALNH]

Is there anyone who legitimately supports returning to Aurentina?

I like it in theory, but in practice, it would probably result in the death of the Senate again since there's not really much new to legislate.

I believe Ainin and a few others also want to go back there.

I've been thinking more about either Vestmark or the blank slate.

Well whatever you do I will be in particracy creating an empire.

[Malgrave]

I do like the idea for returning to Aurentina for nostalgias sake however I can't be certain of it being active again. At the moment i'm leaning towards the blank slate system (although the UN idea is kinda interesting)

[The New World Oceania]

For the sake of sakes.

[The Nihilistic view]

For those of you not part of NWO's inner circle.

[The New World Oceania]

For those of you not part of NWO's inner circle.

Don't be shallow. It's explicitly stated that the formal debate is to give clear information without the inane comments of your sort interjecting. MV supports and is moderating our debate, and I'm particularly concerned about why you're so fervently against the entire NSG Senate, which will be deciding the future in this official thread, being educated in their decision.

[Maklohi Vai]

For those of you not part of NWO's inner circle.

Don't be shallow. It's explicitly stated that the formal debate is to give clear information without the inane comments of your sort interjecting. MV supports and is moderating our debate, and I'm particularly concerned about why you're so fervently against the entire NSG Senate, which will be deciding the future in this official thread, being educated in their decision.

I never said I support the debate. As a matter of fact, I do, but I do not support your putting it together and posting it without making it public first. That's not how this Senate should be run. I appreciate your taking the initiative, but I was under the impression you'd bring it to our attention officially (not in the "We should have a debate" sense) before putting it together.

[The New World Oceania]

Don't be shallow. It's explicitly stated that the formal debate is to give clear information without the inane comments of your sort interjecting. MV supports and is moderating our debate, and I'm particularly concerned about why you're so fervently against the entire NSG Senate, which will be deciding the future in this official thread, being educated in their decision.

I never said I support the debate. As a matter of fact, I do, but I do not support your putting it together and posting it without making it public first. That's not how this Senate should be run. I appreciate your taking the initiative, but I was under the impression you'd bring it to our attention officially (not in the "We should have a debate" sense) before putting it together.

I apologize for such an abrupt presentation for it, and hope we can reconcile in holding it. However, I do feel it will ultimately result, if in any way, for the better. By having a less adversarial discussion between those actively involved in developing their respective concepts, the actual consideration we have here can be improved, ultimately bringing us to a decision not based on personal opinion, but on what will demonstrably be best for the Senate.

[Britanno]

Why exactly do we need a debate? Everyone seems to have already made up their minds.

[The New World Oceania]

Why exactly do we need a debate? Everyone seems to have already made up their minds.

To see if we can get most of us agreeing on one idea. If three fourths of us are unhappy when we reboot, it's likely that people will leave. If our decision comes across as more of a consensus than a majority, sentiments might be more open.

The attempt at a formal debate limited to only a few people is trying to persuade anyone reading based on the argument for the ideas themselves, not how the argument is presented. How well it'll work is left to be seen.

[CTALNH]

Why the fuck don't you just elect a person to decide anything.

Group decisions my ass.

[The Nihilistic view]

Why exactly do we need a debate? Everyone seems to have already made up their minds.

To see if we can get most of us agreeing on one idea. If three fourths of us are unhappy when we reboot, it's likely that people will leave. If our decision comes across as more of a consensus than a majority, sentiments might be more open.

The attempt at a formal debate limited to only a few people is trying to persuade anyone reading based on the argument for the ideas themselves, not how the argument is presented. How well it'll work is left to be seen.

And limit the opinions of 99% of those who have been part of NSG senate.

[Glasgia]

To see if we can get most of us agreeing on one idea. If three fourths of us are unhappy when we reboot, it's likely that people will leave. If our decision comes across as more of a consensus than a majority, sentiments might be more open.

The attempt at a formal debate limited to only a few people is trying to persuade anyone reading based on the argument for the ideas themselves, not how the argument is presented. How well it'll work is left to be seen.

And limit the opinions of 99% of those who have been part of NSG senate.

How does having a debate limit your opinions? It just represents a few of the views out there, you're free to disagree with them.

[The Nihilistic view]

And limit the opinions of 99% of those who have been part of NSG senate.

How does having a debate limit your opinions? It just represents a few of the views out there, you're free to disagree with them.

But not present them in the same forum.