Kouralia wrote:I counter that motion.
I counter that motion.
Advertisement
by People Who Say Ni » Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:48 pm
Economic -8.71
Social -6.54Progressivism 100
Socialism 87.5
Tenderness 50(Australia)
Greens 95%
Labor 72%
Liberal 5%
by Mediciano » Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:49 pm
People Who Say Ni wrote:We can legislate on them. Calling joke orders disorderly would allow us to raise a point of order if they get out of hand, forcing a withdrawal, but still allowing the motions to be made without serious consequence as a source of amusement.
by New Zepuha » Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:50 pm
People Who Say Ni wrote:We can legislate on them. Calling joke orders disorderly would allow us to raise a point of order if they get out of hand, forcing a withdrawal, but still allowing the motions to be made without serious consequence as a source of amusement.
[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.
by New Zepuha » Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:51 pm
[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.
by Dendart » Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:52 pm
by New Zepuha » Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:54 pm
Dendart wrote:A rules committee to make sure that senate rule are upheld. Made up of a balance gov't and opposition members.headed by the PpT
[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.
by Dendart » Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:55 pm
by Dendart » Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:58 pm
by New Zepuha » Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:00 pm
[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.
by Swanderfeld » Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:32 pm
by Lamaredia » Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:51 pm
Dendart wrote:A rules committee to make sure that senate rule are upheld. Made up of a balance gov't and opposition members.headed by the PpT
by Dendart » Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:53 pm
Lamaredia wrote:Dendart wrote:A rules committee to make sure that senate rule are upheld. Made up of a balance gov't and opposition members.headed by the PpT
I know I'm probably shooting myself in the foot, but putting someone who can't be legally removed from office without a motion of no confidence as the head of a rules committee isn't really that smart.
by Courts and Tribunals » Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:05 pm
by Beta Test » Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:20 pm
Finium wrote:Do you have a link to those proceedings? I'm sure there are all kinds of useful things to consider.
by Battlion » Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:23 pm
Lamaredia wrote:Dendart wrote:A rules committee to make sure that senate rule are upheld. Made up of a balance gov't and opposition members.headed by the PpT
I know I'm probably shooting myself in the foot, but putting someone who can't be legally removed from office without a motion of no confidence as the head of a rules committee isn't really that smart.
by Lamaredia » Mon Apr 21, 2014 7:24 am
Battlion wrote:Lamaredia wrote:I know I'm probably shooting myself in the foot, but putting someone who can't be legally removed from office without a motion of no confidence as the head of a rules committee isn't really that smart.
If the legislation I proposed is passed, that will no longer be the case.
by Britanno » Mon Apr 21, 2014 11:22 am
New Zepuha wrote:I'm not even sure you can motion to remove an Admin.
by The Nihilistic view » Mon Apr 21, 2014 11:52 am
Battlion wrote:The part that says the PpT can be appointed by the VP at any time.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement