I did
Advertisement
by Bothara » Wed May 01, 2013 7:14 am
by Divair » Wed May 01, 2013 7:16 am
Harcya wrote:Can I join ^^?
Arglorand wrote:Divair wrote:Aye, need to see who'd like to do it and how many people. If more than a few, then we may need to have brief elections.
I wouldn't mind being the deputy PM, but I'd honestly prefer being a minister. If not Education, then Transportation.
You ought to be the deputy PM, Div - you ARE the leader of this party, after all.
by Arglorand » Wed May 01, 2013 7:22 am
by Hurdegaryp » Wed May 01, 2013 7:26 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Divair » Wed May 01, 2013 7:28 am
Hurdegaryp wrote:TR was already quite popular, but it seems we have even become more popular! Does this make us the Justin Bieber of the NSG Senate?
by DesAnges » Wed May 01, 2013 7:28 am
Hurdegaryp wrote:TR was already quite popular, but it seems we have even become more popular! Does this make us the Justin Bieber of the NSG Senate?
by Arglorand » Wed May 01, 2013 7:32 am
Hurdegaryp wrote:TR was already quite popular, but it seems we have even become more popular! Does this make us the Justin Bieber of the NSG Senate?
by Hurdegaryp » Wed May 01, 2013 7:34 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Arglorand » Wed May 01, 2013 7:35 am
by Hurdegaryp » Wed May 01, 2013 7:36 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Divair » Wed May 01, 2013 7:37 am
Hurdegaryp wrote:Arglorand wrote:Jackson can, in fact, be enjoyed.
Bieber cannot. Even his fans don't really listen to him, they just mute the sound and watch him.
So Bieber should be seen as some kind of erotic dancer? I don't want that to make sense, but unfortunately it would explain quite a few things.
by Bothara » Wed May 01, 2013 8:00 am
Divair wrote:Now that Bothara has posted an app, he is an official member. Welcome aboard!
We now hold 45 seats.
by Len Hyet » Wed May 01, 2013 8:20 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement