NATION

PASSWORD

Condemn the New Warsaw Pact

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.

Should the region New Warsaw Pact be condemned.

Poll ended at Thu Jun 22, 2017 1:22 pm

Yes
1
14%
No
6
86%
 
Total votes : 7

User avatar
Browzantine
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: May 03, 2017
Psychotic Dictatorship

Condemn the New Warsaw Pact

Postby Browzantine » Wed May 03, 2017 1:22 pm

This resolution would condemn the region New Warsaw Pact. This region should be condemned because it denies its people the three inalienable rights in this game, Freedom of speech, Civil rights, and Representation for themselves. It is for these reasons why the New Warsaw Pact should be condemned.

User avatar
Tzion and Jerusalem
Envoy
 
Posts: 267
Founded: Mar 02, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Tzion and Jerusalem » Wed May 03, 2017 1:25 pm

Browzantine wrote:This resolution would condemn the region New Warsaw Pact. This region should be condemned because it denies its people the three inalienable rights in this game, Freedom of speech, Civil rights, and Representation for themselves. It is for these reasons why the New Warsaw Pact should be condemned.

This is the second fake resolution of yours I've come across.
DO YOUR RESEARCH BEFORE ATTEMPTING A RESOLUTION
Proud member of New Mesopotamia Greater East
Not a Jew - just to clear things up.
Christian Male (White and Straight to add) - Oh what horror.
This nation does not necessarily reflect my true opinions.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13711
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Wed May 03, 2017 1:41 pm

Yes, we know why you think the New Warsaw Pact should be Condemned; and yes, we know that the New Warsaw Pact is today's featured region. There is, however, the big question: Can you take your raw input (i.e. the OP) and put it into a draft proposal which complies with the rules whilst expanding on these points, giving examples, stating other Condemnable things about the region, etc?
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385*, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664, GA#671, GA#674, GA#675, GA#677, GA#680, Issue #1580, GA#682, GA#683, GA#684, GA#692, GA#693, GA#715
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; *author of the most popular SC Res. ever; anti-NPO cabalist in good standing; 48yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate ~ currently reading The World by Simon Sebag Montefiore

User avatar
Browzantine
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: May 03, 2017
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Browzantine » Wed May 03, 2017 5:34 pm

Tzion and Jerusalem wrote:This is the second fake resolution of yours I've come across.
DO YOUR RESEARCH BEFORE ATTEMPTING A RESOLUTION



The First one was flawed but should happen. This actually had SOME credibility.


Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads