Advertisement
by Cormactopia II » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:07 am
by LollerLand » Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:27 am
Respecting the wish of the natives and being suspicious of the motives of the ones behind this proposal, The Universal Allegiance has decided to vote against this proposal.
Lollerland
Acting WA Delegate
by Europe and Oceania » Mon Oct 10, 2016 8:19 am
by The United Muslim Caliphate » Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:13 am
by San Poland » Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:13 am
by Selatania » Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:42 am
by San Poland » Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:59 pm
Selatania wrote:"Impressed, despite the dire situation in Social Liberal Union, that Marshal T E Lawrence of The Invaders, in cohorts with other elite raiders, was able to conduct this seemingly-impossible invasion,"
I smell a rat
by Benevolent Thomas » Mon Oct 10, 2016 5:31 pm
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by Ravnabbor » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:43 pm
by Drasnia » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:53 pm
Benevolent Thomas wrote:I don't know which is more sad, Cormac throwing a fit about the notion of Raider Unity, an ideology The Invaders do not ascribe to, or this attempt at a 'brazen stealth operation' within the Security Council by TI.
by Horsean » Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:08 am
by Ainland » Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:26 am
by The Republic People » Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:48 am
by Twilight Imperium » Tue Oct 11, 2016 7:06 am
Boghorn wrote:And the situation ended up getting resolved on its own while the SC sat back and did nothing but bicker over a meaningless law. Yep, this really is like the UN.
by Syolore » Tue Oct 11, 2016 4:01 pm
by We Are Not the NSA » Tue Oct 11, 2016 5:11 pm
Syolore wrote:As a delegate of Syolore, it is to my greatest sorrow to inform the assembly that our nation is relatively new, and has been isolated for some time. As such, I am unsure if our nation has the context necessary to make a decision.
I thought we might be able to glean some information as to what is going on from the resolution and the discussion thereof, but no such luck.
It sounds like a region known the Social Liberal Union has been invaded by several invader groups, and this bill is about whether to "liberate" this invaded region.
However, this bill is suspicious because it's likely that it was proposed by a member of the invading groups.
In addition, it appears every member of the SLU that has appeared before us has advised us to vote against the bill. Thus, it is sounding like that is the desirable course of action.
How accurate is this?
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by Renge Sun » Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:20 pm
Eggy216 wrote:New Zacharianasville wrote:I Voted for. Frankly I dont care how the bill was written, but as soon as I saw the word liberation, I checked out the region that was invaded, and saw some terrible stuff occuring, hence I made my decision. Although I do find it odd that the delegate for the invaders voted for it, fishy stuff...
As a long time member of the Social Liberal Union, I would implore you to change your vote to against. Frankly the bill as it is constructed right now serves to pump the tires of the invaders more than it serves to do anything to help the SLU. At the same time, without any password instituted on the region by the invaders it doesn't do anything to hurt the invasion strategy, and actually makes it harder for us to wrest control back if we have a liberation in the World Assembly preventing us from temporarily locking the region once we get control back in order to expel all of the invaders.
Please, if you seek stand with the SLU, vote against the resolution currently at vote.
by The Skrall » Thu Oct 13, 2016 7:03 am
"Life is simple: move ahead, conquer, secure what you have taken, and then move on."
"We all have a debt to nature due, I'll pay mine and so must you."
- Lord Tuma [Political Compass - Economy: -5.13 | Authoritarianism: 6.54]
We are a nation of silicon-based life forms that live for 1000s of years and are around 2-4 times the height of a human.
by Drasnia » Thu Oct 13, 2016 7:06 am
The Skrall wrote:The region in the proposal, [region=Social Liberal Union], has a FOUNDER!!!
Why the hell do they need a liberation? The Founder can free the region.
This proposal was a waste of the Security Council's time.
by The Skrall » Thu Oct 13, 2016 7:15 am
"Life is simple: move ahead, conquer, secure what you have taken, and then move on."
"We all have a debt to nature due, I'll pay mine and so must you."
- Lord Tuma [Political Compass - Economy: -5.13 | Authoritarianism: 6.54]
We are a nation of silicon-based life forms that live for 1000s of years and are around 2-4 times the height of a human.
by Drasnia » Thu Oct 13, 2016 7:27 am
The Skrall wrote:If the region is already recovered, won't a liberation open it up to attack?
Also, it seems peculiar that the people living in the region want this defeated.
I am voting against this.
by UED » Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:30 am
by Syolore » Fri Oct 14, 2016 6:49 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement